similar to: [LLVMdev] [PATCH] Internalize improvements

Hi, please find an updated patch attached, which applies again after r51017. Gr. Matthijs -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: internalize.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 7663 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080513/94c6e6ad/attachment.diff> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

Hi Dan, > I'm not sure that's very pretty either :-}. My sense is that it's > better to just duplicate those few lines. Then I'll just leave it at that. > An assert at the end that checks that if the loop > wasn't completely unrolled that it's still isLCSSAForm would be a > good addition in any case. Good idea. > I don't think it's desirable

Hello Matthijs, On May 9, 2008, at 3:47 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > Hi All, > > the attached patch performs the splitting in the proposed manner. > before applying the patch, please execute > svn cp lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnroll.cpp lib/Transforms/Utils/ > UnrollLoop.cpp > to make the patch apply and preserve proper history. > > Transforms/Utils/UnrollLoop.cpp

Hi All, the attached patch performs the splitting in the proposed manner. before applying the patch, please execute svn cp lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnroll.cpp lib/Transforms/Utils/UnrollLoop.cpp to make the patch apply and preserve proper history. Transforms/Utils/UnrollLoop.cpp contains the unrollLoop function, which is now used by the LoopUnroll pass. I've also moved the

Hi, the newly added LoopDeletion pass uses loop-deletion as it's name (and thus commandline option for opt). Looking at the other loop passes (loop-rotate, loop-unroll, loop-reduce), perhaps loop-delete would be a better name? Gr. Matthijs -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc:

Hello Matthijs, Separating mechanism from policy is a good thing for the LoopUnroll pass. Instead of moving the policy to a subclass though, I think it'd be better to move the mechanism, the unrollLoop function, out to be a standalone utility function, with the LoopInfo object passed in explicitly. FoldBlockIntoPredecessor would also be good to make into a standalone utility function, since

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2621 Bug ID: 2621 Summary: ControlMaster started by scp (non-ssh?) doesn't forward agent Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.3p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous

Hi Dan, please find an updated patch attached (don't forget to run the svn cp command I posted earlier, before applying this patch). I've incorporated all the changes we've discussed. Gr. Matthijs -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL:

Hi all, about a month ago, I've started working on my master's thesis. Since I want to focus on just that work, I've stopped my LLVM work for now. It is unclear whether I will continue my work after graduation, but it seems unlikely. I'll still keep track of LLVM from a personal interest (mostly watching the IRC channel), but I won't have the time to track any mailing lists.

Hi I have to time series with a different time base. The first has only sporadic datapoints: 2011-02-01 15.29130 2011-02-08 17.60278 2011-02-15 17.99737 2011-02-22 25.43690 The other has a daily datapoint: 2011-02-01 342.34 2011-02-02 68.45 2011-02-03 130.47 2011-02-04 129.86 2011-02-05 81.98 2011-02-06 77.30 2011-02-07 81.38 2011-02-08 139.95 2011-02-09 124.40 ...etc. In Excel, it is fairly

Hi, In my work applying -flto to Chrome, I need to set some names to be skipped by the InternalizePass; otherwise, the linking stage fails (i.e., when building the chrome binary). In the past, I had a tiny patch that I hadn't submitted to LLVM: it was something like: Index: Internalize.cpp =================================================================== --- Internalize.cpp (revision

I''m doing a redirect in one of my controller actions and somehow I can''t spec it, see this pastie: http://pastie.caboo.se/53120. When following the link from a browser I''m being redirected to the right page. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi I have a time series of measurements: every 10 min. a value was logged. The data look like: 20100914 08:01 3.74 20100914 08:11 3.74 20100914 08:21 3.71 20100914 08:31 4.39 20100914 08:41 3.74 This data spans several months. I would like to group the data per day. In Matlab it is fairly easy to obtain a cell array, of which the first column contains the date of each

Hello, while investigating a report from Jan-Piet Mens (resulting in http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/changeset/3109), we discovered that NSD (both 3.2.15 and 4.0.0b4) compresses labels in RP content. As far as I can see, this is not allowed by RFC3597 section 4 paragraph 1/2. PowerDNS Recursor, like Unbound and BIND, now deals with this as 3597 section 4 paragraph 4 says we SHOULD. Nevertheless,

Hi Hal, Thanks for your hint! $ /opt/llvm-svn/bin/opt -S -internalize -internalize-public-api-list=main -globaldce hello3.ll -o hello3.dce.ll    it works :) But I argue that `main` Function should be inserted into ExternalNames by default: Index: lib/Transforms/IPO/Internalize.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/Transforms/IPO/Internalize.cpp 

Hi Nicolas (at least, I suspect your signing of your mail with "Anton" was not intentional :-p), > I assume that's the same as the online demo's "Show LLVM C++ API code" > option (http://llvm.org/demo/)? I've tried that with a structure containing > four floating-point components but it also appears to add them individually > using extract/insert. Maybe

Hi, Sean: I'm sorry I lie. I didn't mean to lie. I did try to avoid making a *BIG* change to the IPO pass-ordering for now. However, when I make a minor change to populateLTOPassManager() by separating module-pass and non-module-passes, I saw quite a few performance difference, most of them are degradations. Attacking these degradations one by one in a piecemeal manner is wasting

Hi all, I have used tinc to get a vpn up and running I am almost there but have some problems at the end. My config: Building A Network 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 10.0.0.30 tap0 device on gateway machine 10.0.0.31 Building B Network 10.2.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 10.2.0.154 tap0 device on gateway machine 10.2.0.155 from network A I can ping 10.2.0.154 but not the other

Hi All, I've been fiddling around with a DenseMap to store cached copies of some result. In short, I'm doing the following: It = Map.find(Key) if (It != Map.end() && It->second != Unknown) Return It->second; // do_stuff return Map[Key] = Result; However, I this requires two lookups in the hash table, which is not so nice. Currently, there is no way to write this down so

Hi, the attached patch splits the loop unroll pass into a LoopUnroll superclass that implements the unrolling mechanism, and a SimpleLoopUnroll subclass implementing the current policy. This split is modeled after the split between Inliner and SimpleInliner. The superclass currently still finds out the TripCount and TripMultiple, and passes those, together with the Loop in question, to a policy