similar to: [LLVMdev] nonlocal go to -- how?

Hi, > The problem is with the go to statement. Again, local go to's, that go > somewhere within the same function are no particular problem -- though I > haven't studied the interaction with alloca yet; that might offer a few > surprises. The questions I have are about goto's that exit from a > function. The traditional mechanism is to implement a label as an

On Sun, 04 May 2008 16:05:44 +0000, Hendrik Boom wrote: > The languages I'm faced with compiling in the near future have nonlocal > go to statements and nested procedures. > > A procedure gets implemented as a structure containing its entry point > and an environment pointer. It is easy enough to call its entry point > and pass the environment pointer as an extra argument

On Mon, 05 May 2008 09:56:26 +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi, > >> The problem is with the go to statement. Again, local go to's, that go >> somewhere within the same function are no particular problem -- though >> I haven't studied the interaction with alloca yet; that might offer a >> few surprises. The questions I have are about goto's that exit

On May 4, 2008, at 9:05 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote: > The languages I'm faced with compiling in the near future have > nonlocal goto statements and nested procedures. You want to return to a previous activation record (pascal speak) or stack frame? If yes, then yes, EH will do that for you. You'll want to understand what EH is in detail and how to map the semantics you want

Hi, MemDep caches results for local queries and provides means to invalidate them by keeping reverse maps. Unfortunately, it also caches results that represent non-local dependencies, for which there are no reverse map entries, and thus those entries can not be invalidated. This is a problem when an optimization turns a non-local dependency into a local one.

On Jul 22, 2013, at 12:56 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > my understanding is different. I'm pretty sure that what I'm about to say is > the traditional way these things have been viewed in LLVM. That doesn't mean > that it's the best way to view these things. > >> - nounwind means no dwarf EH. Absence > > I guess you mean

Hi Andrew, On 22/07/13 09:32, Andrew Trick wrote: > > On Jul 21, 2013, at 11:55 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr > <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> On 22/07/13 02:56, Andrew Trick wrote: >>> Does 'nounwind' have semantics that inform optimization passes? It seems to >>> in some cases, but not

On Jul 21, 2013, at 11:55 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 22/07/13 02:56, Andrew Trick wrote: >> Does 'nounwind' have semantics that inform optimization passes? It seems to in some cases, but not consistently. For example... >> >> int32_t foo(int32_t* ptr) { >> int i = 0; >> int result; >> do {

Hi Andrew, On 22/07/13 10:23, Andrew Trick wrote: > > On Jul 22, 2013, at 12:56 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr > <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote: > >> my understanding is different. I'm pretty sure that what I'm about to say is >> the traditional way these things have been viewed in LLVM. That doesn't mean >> that it's the

Hi, I have a question about the memory dependence analysis. I am trying to use it to selectively enumerate a set of pairs of (load, store) instructions for every function by calling getNonLocalDependency() on the MemoryDependenceAnalysis. This populates a DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Value*>. I just looked up an usage of this in GVN.cpp: MD->getNonLocalDependency(C, deps); for

I am attempting to install EnterpriseSamba (Sernet) on a Ubuntu 14.04.1LTS server. I finding it a challenge to determine the proper installation and configuration procedures with sernet-samba. There are no (at least I cannot find them) how-to's or instructions or readme on the sernet download website. Any ideas where to find such or guidance? (I post this here because I seem to remember

On Jul 28, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Prakash Prabhu wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question about the memory dependence analysis. I am trying > to use it to selectively enumerate a set of pairs of (load, store) > instructions for every function by calling getNonLocalDependency() > on the MemoryDependenceAnalysis. This populates a > DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Value*>. I just

Did, as su "apt-get install sernet-samba-ad" (after adding source to repositories.) (Have a test setup on CentOS 6.6 running but it is Samba 4.3.0 ** from git. Would prefer Samba version not so new as 4.3.0 so, want to change to Ubuntu.) --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an

Is there something like the LISP function dribble in R? This would log all the output to a file but still show it on the terminal too. sink just diverts the output, but I dont see a way to do what dribble would do? Johann -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send

I am perfectly aware that this question is not an R question, at least not yet, but I have not succeeded in finding what I want in other ways, so ... What I am looking for are two algorithms, preferabley in Pascal, but other languages may do. For (a) systematic (complete) permutations for grouped data with unequal group sizes, and (b) random permutations for the same kind of data. I know

I'm just curious if any one else has noticed this. I've bought hard drives from both Walmart and Best Buy. If I can wait, I order them from newegg.com. I'm beginning to think that the staff at both Walmart and Best Buy, somewhere along the supply line must dribble the drives like basket balls. The reason I say that is all the drives I have bought from those two places fail within a few

Just finished the compiling llvm without llvm-gcc from svn. Tried it out. Got g++ -o hlvm.o -c -I/farhome/hendrik/dv/llvm/llvm/include -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -g -Woverloaded-virtual hlvm.cpp In file included from /farhome/hendrik/dv/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/DerivedTypes.h: 21, from hlvm.cpp:1: /farhome/hendrik/dv/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/Type.h:19:31: error:

Hello, by suggestion from linux-btrfs I post this to samba at lists.samba.org. I think, thiss is a bug in Samba. Can you confirm and suggest a workaround? Regards, Hendrik ------ Weitergeleitete Nachricht ------ Von: "Hendrik Friedel" <hendrik at friedels.name> An: "Btrfs BTRFS" <linux-btrfs at vger.kernel.org> Gesendet: 12.05.2019 13:27:00 Betreff: Btrfs Samba

Hendrik, You could also just "touch ~/.cvspass" to create the file which should eliminate the warning. However, since you did a login, and it seemed successful, chances are the file now exists (containing the blank password for anon at llvm.org). Reid. On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 09:14 -0500, John Criswell wrote: > Hendrik Boom wrote: > > I tried to access the latest LLVM, since

I tried to access the latest LLVM, since several messages here so far have referred me to it. Now I have no experience with CVS-over-the-net. My previous experiences with versoin control have been RCS and Monotone. Brief summary: hendrik at lovesong:~/dv$ mkdir llvm hendrik at lovesong:~/dv$ cd llvm hendrik at lovesong:~/dv/llvm$ cvs -d :pserver:anon at llvm.org:/var/cvs/llvm login Logging in