similar to: [LLVMdev] Lost in the documentation

On Apr 28, 2008, at 17:32, Hendrik Boom wrote: > In http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html, when taking about writing a compiler > that uses LLVM (at least I think that's what the FAQ question is > asking), > the FAQ recommends > >> # Call into the LLVM libraries code using your language's FFI >> (foreign >> function interface). >> >> * for:

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:54:31 -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On Apr 28, 2008, at 17:32, Hendrik Boom wrote: > >> In http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html, when taking about writing a compiler >> that uses LLVM (at least I think that's what the FAQ question is >> asking), >> the FAQ recommends >> >>> # Call into the LLVM libraries code using your

On 2008-04-29, at 08:41, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:54:31 -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > >> On Apr 28, 2008, at 17:32, Hendrik Boom wrote: >> >>> In http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html, when taking about writing a >>> compiler >>> that uses LLVM (at least I think that's what the FAQ question is >>> asking), >>> the

I am just beginning to use LLVM, and find that 'getting started' is the steep part of the learning curve. I am using MingW and msys, which I have not fully grokked yet. Anyway, actually building the libraries from source is turning out to be difficult. I want to work with LLVM as described in the except from the LLVM FAQ below. I am using C++, so the FFI is a non-issue. Can someone

Out of curiosity, I'm replacing the JIT with MCJIT on my compiler. As all "external" functions are provided by the language's FFI mechanism, it does MyExecutionEngine->DisableSymbolSearching(); MyExecutionEngine->InstallLazyFunctionCreator(&MyLazyFunctionCreator); which works fine with the JIT. However, MCJIT insists on resolving unknown symbols by searching them

Hendrik, You could also just "touch ~/.cvspass" to create the file which should eliminate the warning. However, since you did a login, and it seemed successful, chances are the file now exists (containing the blank password for anon at llvm.org). Reid. On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 09:14 -0500, John Criswell wrote: > Hendrik Boom wrote: > > I tried to access the latest LLVM, since

I tried to access the latest LLVM, since several messages here so far have referred me to it. Now I have no experience with CVS-over-the-net. My previous experiences with versoin control have been RCS and Monotone. Brief summary: hendrik at lovesong:~/dv$ mkdir llvm hendrik at lovesong:~/dv$ cd llvm hendrik at lovesong:~/dv/llvm$ cvs -d :pserver:anon at llvm.org:/var/cvs/llvm login Logging in

I took the first two lines of the sample program in the tutorial: hendrik at lovesong:~/dv/lang/hlvm$ cat broken.cpp #include "llvm/DerivedTypes.h" #include "llvm/Module.h" hendrik at lovesong:~/dv/lang/hlvm$ and tried to compile them using the llvm-dev in Debian testing: hendrik at lovesong:~/dv/lang/hlvm$ g++ -o broken.o -c broken.cpp In file included from

On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:52:16 -0700, Thomas Hudson wrote: > You need to use the script 'llvm-config' to pass correct arguments to g > ++: > > g++ -o broken.o `llvm-config --cxxflags` broken.cpp > > Interesting. When I type the command as you provided it (using cut-and-paste) I get: hendrik at lovesong:~/dv/lang/hlvm$ g++ -o broken.o `llvm-config --cxxflags`

On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 09:26:07 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > Hendrik, > > You could also just "touch ~/.cvspass" to create the file which should > eliminate the warning. However, since you did a login, and it seemed > successful, chances are the file now exists (containing the blank > password for anon at llvm.org). Indeed, the file is there. > > Reid. >

Just finished the compiling llvm without llvm-gcc from svn. Tried it out. Got g++ -o hlvm.o -c -I/farhome/hendrik/dv/llvm/llvm/include -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -g -Woverloaded-virtual hlvm.cpp In file included from /farhome/hendrik/dv/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/DerivedTypes.h: 21, from hlvm.cpp:1: /farhome/hendrik/dv/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/Type.h:19:31: error:

The hardware requirements claim that there is no native code generation for the AMD 64. Is anyone working toward this? -- hendrik

Hi I'm currently prowling for some IMAP tools to help me maintain our mailboxes. I'd prefer "pure" IMAP, i.e. no messing with file system directly, but would settle for more crude ways if need be. Specifically I am looking for: - Expunge tool: Outlook does not seem to auto-expunge messages in any way shape or form. So I'd like to run a daily cron to expunge all

Hello, I'm writng this message to see if anyone knows how to analyze a data with geometrically distributed outcome. My situation now is : I have a outcome which is geometrically distributed. And I've also self-derived the link function for geometric distribution. I want to use generalized linear models to analyze it, but there're only models for binary data, poisson distributed

Hendrik Boom wrote: > I tried to access the latest LLVM, since several messages here so far have > referred me to it. Now I have no experience with CVS-over-the-net. My > previous experiences with versoin control have been RCS and Monotone. > > Brief summary: > > hendrik at lovesong:~/dv$ mkdir llvm > hendrik at lovesong:~/dv$ cd llvm > hendrik at lovesong:~/dv/llvm$

>> >> I think I may have found an exception to this -- the API seems to >> require me to have all the fields for a struct ready before I >> construct the struct. I don't have the ability to make a struct >> type, use it to declare some variables, and still contribute fields >> to it during the rest of the compilation. >> >> Is there a

There wouldn't happen to be an index telling one which libraries define which symbols, would there? For example, if I'm told alvm.o: In function `llvm::Function::Create(llvm::FunctionType const*, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, llvm::Module*)':

One more question. I hope you're not getting tired of me already. Does generating LLVM code have to proceed in any particular order? Of course, if I am writing LLVM assembler by appending characters to the end of a sequential file, I'd have to write everything in the order prescribed by the assembler syntax. But if I'm using the C interface to build an LLVM parse tree, does that

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 10:38:37AM -0400, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 09:51:51 -0400, Hendrik Boom stated: > >Was there any reason for this message to be HTML-only? > > Was there any reason to 'top post' and include the HTML text? Yes. (1) To indicate that my question was about the whole message and not its contents. I normally don't top-post. (2) To make it

On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:48:09 +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > Hi Hendrik, > >> -rw-r--r-- 1 hendrik sbox 1328 2008-06-03 10:00 iterator -rw-r--r-- >> 1 hendrik sbox 2418 2008-06-03 10:00 iterator.h.in > Did you run AutoGen.sh (not sure about case). I think that's needed when > compiling from svn, and it should generate the makefiles for building >