similar to: [LLVMdev] OCaml Kaleidoscope tutorial links to the C++ tutorial

I've just committed the first two chapters of my ocaml llvm bindings tutorial by porting the Kaleidoscope tutorial to ocaml. These chapters are the lexer and parser. If anyone is interest in trying it out, I'd love any feedback. If you've got the svn trunk checked out, you'll find the docs here: docs/tutorial/OCamlLangImpl1.html docs/tutorial/OCamlLangImpl2.html If not, you can

On Mar 27, 2008, at 04:30, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > I've just committed the first two chapters of my ocaml llvm bindings > tutorial by porting the Kaleidoscope tutorial to ocaml. These chapters > are the lexer and parser. If anyone is interest in trying it out, I'd > love any feedback. If you've got the svn trunk checked out, you'll > find the docs here: > >

Perhaps somebody out there knows where this link should point: http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#TypeResolve It simply goes to the top of the document, probably because something has been deleted or the document has been converted to reST. It is found on the last page of the Kaleidoscope tutorial: http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/LangImpl8.html. -- Mikael -------------- next part

Hi Chris, Here are some diffs for the final three chapters of the Kaleidoscope tutorial. The changes are the same sort of changes as previous diffs. One question though....under the "Memory in LLVM" section of chapter 7 (mutable variables) there is a statement like this: The mem2reg pass implements the standard "iterated dominator frontier" algorithm... Should this read

On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:31:57 -0500, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Applied in r106468, thanks! > > -Chris I think there's a few bugs left in the Kaleidoscope tutorial -- I noticed somebody converted some of the "Builder.CreateAdd" to CreateFAdd, etc., but there seem to be a few that got missed. Attached diff is what I could find... Kevin Kelley

Hi all, being myself still a llvm novice I thought I'd do all fellow newbies a favor and provide a patch that makes the code in the tutorial compile with 2.4, just to avoid extra headache in the (not so easy) process of getting into the matters... it's actually just the new template parameters of the IRBuilder class. The patch is on the docs/ level since I didn't checkout the whole

Good morning everyone, It seems the LLVM tutorial is not up to date anymore and doesn't compile as is... The function makeLLVMModule() function doesn't compile at all. Here is a fix: Module *makeLLVMModule() { // Caches the global context to share it with new Module() and IntegerType::get() calls LLVMContext &context = getGlobalContext(); // Module Construction

Index: docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html =================================================================== --- docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html (revision 105365) +++ docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html (working copy) @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ def unary-(v) 0-v; -# Define &gt; with the same precedence as &gt;. +# Define &gt; with the same precedence as &lt;. def binary&gt; 10 (LHS RHS)

Applied in r106468, thanks! -Chris On Jun 2, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Adam Warner wrote: > Index: docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html > =================================================================== > --- docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html (revision 105365) > +++ docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html (working copy) > @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ > def unary-(v) > 0-v; > > -# Define &gt; with

I'm working thought the Kaleidoscope tutorials for LLVM 3.3 and noticed the code listing for chapter 4 is out of date on the web. Take a look at http://llvm.org/releases/3.3/docs/tutorial/LangImpl4.html. The first line includes llvm/DerivedTypes.h, but this does not compile. The correct path is llvm/IR/Derivedtypes.h. There are other differences, and the examples that I pulled along with

I'm going through the Kaleidoscope tutorial, adding the codegen() functions: https://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/LangImpl03.html. I cannot find any discussion of header files to include, (other than the include of llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h in the lexer/parser code), and the compilation is failing due to several undefined symbols: LogErrorV, Value, LLVMContext, APFloat, and others. I've been hunting

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:56 PM, ALbert Mietus <albert at ons-huis.net> wrote: > Hello All > > I 'm studing LLVM/Clang and trying to follow the Kaleidoscope tutorial > (Release 2.6 version). > I found some minir docu-bugs and added them to Bugzilla. > > However, Now I found a show-stopper for me, the toy (v4) demo does > build, but does crash, on any input. Even a

Hi everyone. I am using LLVM 2.4 release to practise the tutorial at Kaleidoscope Chapter 4. I built the LLVM library, and created my own project, and then paste the code from the tutorial into my own project. Then after compiled and built it, I passed the built stage. (I am using visual studio 2005 ) However, when I tried to input some code in the command line window, the sample program crashed.

Hi there, I've been working through the tutorial on using LLVM to implement a small language (http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/index.html), and I noticed that the code in the tutorial is a bit out of sync with LLVM 3.5. I managed to get the code working, and it appears to even be working correctly. I'd like to help correct the tutorial so that other people can also benefit from the pain

Thank you very much for your idea, chuck Zhao. May I ask whether you have solved this problem or not? -- Best regards. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20081203/f53425e5/attachment.html>

Hi Andrew, Am 04.06.2013 02:13, schrieb Kaylor, Andrew: > Hi Dmitri, > > You might want to try replacing the call to JMM->invalidInstructionCache() with a call to TheExecutionEngine->finalizeObject(). If you are getting a non-NULL pointer from getPointerToFunction but it crashes when you try to call it, that is most likely because the memory for the generated code has not been

Hi llvm-dev: Sorry for bothering at this mailing list, as I don't know where to ask. I'm learning LLVM and read the tutorials and found that there are tutorials for C++, C and Ocaml users. I recently found that there are D bindings for LLVM and it is feasible to write this tutorial in D. I'd like to take on this little project and translate the code to D, making changes where

Am 04.06.2013 16:05, schrieb David Tweed: > | I am curious about JMM->invalidInstructionCache(), which I found in > | lli.cpp implementation. lli.cpp contains also call finalizeObject(), I > | just overlooked it. lli.cpp calls finalizeObject(), which calls > | applyPermissions, which in turn calls invalidateInstructionCache. So why > | lli.cpp does call

Hi Dmitri, You're right. The lli code should be cleaned up. As David said, there was a time when the call to invalidate the instruction cache was necessary. It isn't necessary anymore. -Andy -----Original Message----- From: Dmitri Rubinstein [mailto:dmitri.rubinstein at googlemail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 7:20 AM To: David Tweed Cc: Kaylor, Andrew; LLVM Dev Subject: Re:

I'm working through the Kaleidoscope tutorial through section 2.4, and I've encountered some problems: several minor bugs, and finally a bus error that has me stumped: ------- In the code listed in LLVM Tutorial section 2.2 Implementing a Parser and AST. Line 19 has a comma at the end of line that shouldn't be there Line 120 is missing a closing angle bracket. Line 120 should be