similar to: [LLVMdev] newbie with pass registering Problem

Hi!! This is my first time with llvm. I'm still learning and really need help. I wrote only one Function Pass, which uses another Function Pass (blockNrs), and registered this: RegisterPass<FunctionAnalysis> X("gasched", "Genom Scheduling Pass"); When I compile my sourcecode, everything was okay. But when I tried to test it, i got this error Message: nicole at

Hi!! This is my first time with llvm. I'm still learning and really need help. I wrote only one Function Pass, which uses another Function Pass (blockNrs), and registered this: RegisterPass<FunctionAnalysis> X("gasched", "Genom Scheduling Pass"); When I compile my sourcecode, everything was okay. But when I tried to test it, i got this error Message: nicole at

I've been running into a kernel panic pretty consistently when using data=journal. This occurs during heavy IO, and is highly reproducible (only takes about 5 minutes of IO to cause it). The applications being used are MySQL, Postfix, and a mail filtering application which operates on postfix queue files using mmaped IO. Shortly before the crash, the following messages are logged: Mar

Hello. On a server running 2.4.25, I have the two following errors in the kernel logfile: Unexpected dirty buffer encountered at do_get_write_access:618 (08:11 blocknr 920707) Unexpected dirty buffer encountered at do_get_write_access:618 (08:11 blocknr 920707) Should I worry about them (disk failure, filesystem damage) ? Thanks. As an addition what does the pair '08:11' means ? Is

Hello ext3-users-request, request ======= 2004-03-03 12:00:00 You writed======= >Send Ext3-users mailing list submissions to > ext3-users at redhat.com > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ext3-users-request at redhat.com >

It's both in 2.6 and recent 2.6 (for RH ASS2.1 you'll probably need to copy the latest 2.4 defintion, but I don't care for obsolete junk). Index: src/super.c =================================================================== --- src/super.c (revision 1014) +++ src/super.c (working copy) @@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ /* get first two blocks */ for (i=0; i<2; i++) { - bhs[i] = getblk

Hi, I would like to give a quick update on what my current design and implementation go like. Basically, the `FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor` is now modified to a generic version `FunctionToLoopUnitPassAdaptor`, which allows re-using the existing codes to implement `FunctionToLoopNestPassAdaptor`, with the help of additional metadata associated with `Loop` and `LoopNest`. Both

This patch contains the following cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - journal.c: remove the unused global function __journal_internal_check and move the check to journal_init - remove the following write-only global variable: - journal.c: current_journal - remove the following unneeded EXPORT_SYMBOL: - journal.c: journal_recover Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk

Please use the mailinglist to ask for support. ----- Forwarded message from siwinski op ever.com.pl ----- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:21:28 +0100 From: Szymon Iwi?ski <siwinski op ever.com.pl> Subject: "Ever" Company UPS drivers To: nut-upsdev-owner op lists.alioth.debian.org Dear NUT Developers, First of all I would like to introduce myself, my name is

Hello, I am not subscribed to this mailing list. My apologies if non-members are not allowed to post in this forum. I have a Linux-2.4.19pre10aa4 computer and I have seen an error message "Unexpected dirty buffer encountered at do_get_write_access:598 (03:05 blocknr 0)" appears in the log. With a little bit of research I found that this message is printed from fs/jbd/journal.c,

Dear NUT Developers, First of all I would like to introduce myself, my name is Simon Iwi?ski and for some time right now I'm working in Ever Company that design and builds UPSes from scratch. I'm responsible mostly for proper functionality of "Evers" IT sector but lately also for our dedicated application (called PowerSoft) testing and development. Recently I've heard

This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - #if 0 the following unused global functions: - journal.c: __journal_internal_check - journal.c: journal_ack_err - remove the following write-only global variable: - journal.c: current_journal - remove the following unneeded EXPORT_SYMBOL's: - journal.c: journal_check_used_features -

Hallo da mein English nicht so gut ist und bei der ?bersetzung auch noch Missverst?ndnisse auftretten k?nnten, hier das Orginal :-) Das Problem ist, dass bei der Kombination openssh pam und ldap, die Verbindung zum Ldapserver so lange offen gehalten wird bis die ssh Session geschlossen wird. Das ist nur bei SSH so ! Alle andere Dienste sprechen den Server an und schliessen nach Best?ttigung des

This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - journal.c: remove the unused global function __journal_internal_check and move the check to journal_init - remove the following write-only global variable: - journal.c: current_journal - remove the following unneeded EXPORT_SYMBOL's: - journal.c: journal_check_used_features -

Hi everyone, So this question is more for people who are familiar with the internals of ext3. I notice that the function journal_init_dev() sets the value journal->j_blk_offset = start This means that start can be any arbitrary block number on the device. However, later in the function journal_bmap() it is never actually used. The value of *retp in journal_bmap() is set to *retp =

Hi Stephen, I found a bug in JBD routine journal_create() in kernel 2.6, when I debug the OCFS v2 driver. mark_buffer_dirty() reports buffer_head is not uptodate. See following bug description. ------------------------------------------------------- OS: Linux Kernel 2.6.1 Plarform: IA32 Steps: 1. Build the ocfs v2 driver under kernel 2.6. 2. insert ocfs2.ko into kernel 2.6. 3. mkfs.ocfs2 -F

Hi, Michael I have met ext4 error when using vhost_scsi on arm64 platform, and suspect it is vhost_scsi issue. Ext4 error when testing virtio_scsi & vhost_scsi No issue: 1. virtio_scsi, ext4 2. vhost_scsi & virtio_scsi, ext2 3. Instead of vhost, also tried loopback and no problem. Using loopback, host can use the new block device, while vhost is used by guest (qemu).

Hi, Michael I have met ext4 error when using vhost_scsi on arm64 platform, and suspect it is vhost_scsi issue. Ext4 error when testing virtio_scsi & vhost_scsi No issue: 1. virtio_scsi, ext4 2. vhost_scsi & virtio_scsi, ext2 3. Instead of vhost, also tried loopback and no problem. Using loopback, host can use the new block device, while vhost is used by guest (qemu).

Hi Sanjoy, > Attached set of patches splits llvm.init.trampoline into an "init" > phase and an "adjust" phase, as discussed on the "Go on dragonegg" > thread. thanks for doing this. The patches look good, though the decomposition into individual patches is not that great (since things won't always work, in fact not even compile I think, with not all

V1->V2: -Changed dio_end_io to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL -Removed the own_submit blockdev dio helper -Removed the boundary change V2->V3 -Made it so we keep track of what the current logical offset in the file we have a BIO setup for so we can pass it into the submit_io hook. Because BTRFS can do RAID and such, we need our own submit hook so we can setup the bio''s in the correct fashion,