similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-as parse error

Hi: I have just started to use llvm and confronted with a problem: when I want to transform something very simple for name.ll to name.bc with llvm-as name.ll, some errors occured: error: parse error, expecting `GLOBAL' or `CONSTANT' while reading token: 'target' btw, the name.ll file is as follows: ; ModuleID = 'tst.bc' target datalayout =

On Apr 14, 2008, at 4:35 PM, code_nf wrote: > Hi: > I have just started to use llvm and confronted with a problem: > when I want to transform something very simple for name.ll to > name.bc with llvm-as name.ll, some errors occured: > > error: parse error, expecting `GLOBAL' or `CONSTANT' while reading > token: 'target' Hi. I am having exactly the same

> The x86-64 one probably doesn't work for Winodws. That's likely the > issue. Well, x86-64 stub was never ported to intel assembler, I expect to see 32-bit one used on windows64. In general, the whole windows64 support is missed mainly due to crazy calling convetion invented by Microsoft. So, all calls from code being JITed to external functions will be clearly broken (if they

Hola LLVMers, I'm debugging through some strangeness that I'm seeing on X64 on windows with LLVM2.2. I had to change the code so that it would engage the x64 target machine on windows builds, but I've otherwise left LLVM 2.2 alone. The basic idea is that I've got a function bar which is compiled by VStudio and I'm creating another function foo via LLVM JIT which is going

Hello, Chuck > I've had a look at the stubs before and I think I'm circumventing them > in the example program since I populate the table and compile the > functions in the order so that things never need to be done lazily, but > I'll look further. Well, anyway stubs are definitely wrong from windows64 and this should be fixed, otherwise funny stuff can happen from time to

Hi, I tried building LLVM with the downloaded sources. I am building it with gcc4.3. After getting configured successfully, and running 'make', build fails with the following message: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/guest/SRC/llvm-2.1/lib/System' llvm[1]: Compiling DynamicLibrary.cpp for Release build DynamicLibrary.cpp: In static member function âstatic void*

On Feb 12, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Chuck Rose III wrote: > Hola LLVMers, > > I’m debugging through some strangeness that I’m seeing on X64 on > windows with LLVM2.2. I had to change the code so that it would > engage the x64 target machine on windows builds, but I’ve otherwise > left LLVM 2.2 alone. The basic idea is that I’ve got a function bar > which is compiled by

Hi Team, I am migrating one of the Pass that was written for llvm2.2 or older to llvm3.1. The code snippet looks like the following: Constant *func; void add( Module *M) { func = M->getOrInsertFunction("func", Type::getVoidTy(M->getContext()), NULL); } virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { add (&M); for(Module::iterator F = M.begin(), E = M.end(); F !=

Hey Evan, At the point of the instructions you suggested I step through, X86ISelLowering has this state: - this 0x00000000005fe728 {VarArgsFrameIndex=-842150451 RegSaveFrameIndex=-842150451 VarArgsGPOffset=3452816845 ...} llvm::X86TargetLowering * const + llvm::TargetLowering {TM={...} TD=0x00000000008edac0

Hi, I intend to participate in Google's Summer of Code this year, so I'd like to bounce another idea around to see what you guys think. (I posted a similar message to cfe-dev just now.) Be warned: this will shock you. It may even horrify you. 1. Implement a 16-bit x86 backend. (*Chris recoils in horror*) Yeah, I know 16-bit x86 is dead, but I find it interesting for historical purposes

hi, all: i want to add a function in xen. in the function i need to call the "printk" to display the values of some variables. i found the definition of printk() in file "xen-3.1.0-src\xen\include\xen\lib.h ": extern void printk(const char *format, ...) __attribute__ ((format (printf, 1, 2))); who can tell me the location of printk()? thanks in advance. 2008-04-26

hi, my friends: Currently, i am studying the way of hypercall's implementation. i have already known the flow of hypercall's execuation, and i decided to add a new hypercall into the Xen. first, i want to know the detail of one hypercall function, for example, "do_xen_version", but i can not find the location of definition of "do_xen_version". who can help me? i have

Hi vedant, The program didn't pass the checking "OF->getArch() != Triple(Arch).getArch()" loadBinaryFormat in CoverageMappingReader.cpp and returned an error. It's because "OF->getArch()" returned null and "Triple(Arch).getArch()" returned XXXX(name of my arch). The returned value of " OF->getArch()" is decided by "

Hi Ahmad, On 03/01/13 16:26, Hassan, Ahmad wrote: > Hi Team, > > I am migrating one of the Pass that was written for llvm2.2 or older to llvm3.1. > The code snippet looks like the following: > > Constant *func; > > void add( Module *M) { > > func = M->getOrInsertFunction("func", Type::getVoidTy(M->getContext()), NULL); this function has no

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is slowly driving me nuts! I have several Cisco 7960s with SIP 8.2/7.5 fw connecting to Asterisk 1.2.5 driving a TE110P on a BT EuroISDN PRI line. On all outgoing calls I get a double ring tone (UK style + US style). I also have a DECT phone on a Sipura SPA-3000 configured with UK tones. This gives me a double ring of UK + UK, so this

I could use some direction. I need a form to collect information on a user''s allergies. I want to present them with a form much like the one we fill out when we see a new doc where you just check-off the things you''re allergic to. When the form comes back to the controller I want to add a record to a table for each allergy they''ve checked. I was thinking I should

Hi vedant, 1. First, I think your theory is right that llvm’s object file reading libraries do not “understand” the architecture I’m working on. Since I’m using binutils as assembler which means llvm can only provide asm and object file is provided by biutils. I think these ELF header information is provided by my binutils now, so maybe I have to modify binutils code to provide ELF header

Hi, All I have to do some job with PV-driver, who could give me some advice, thank you very much! 2010-10-19 xudongxen _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

hi I've some problems with netback 1.what's mmap_pages for, which come from balloon operation ？ mmap_pages = alloc_empty_pages_and_pagevec(MAX_PENDING_REQS) 2.what's the meaning of "refcnt" defined in netif_t (netif->refcnt) 3.irq enable and disable such as disable_irq(netif->irq); why netback use such enable & disable operations while netfront dont use for its

Hi vedant, 1. The definition is from llvm/Supprot/ELF.h. But this machine information(e_machine) is given to compiler at lib/MC/ELFObjectWriter.cpp. I greped the whole llvm project and found that e_machine was assigned at only two files. One was lib/MC/ELFObjectWriter.cpp(there was an comment said “e_machine=target”) and the other was tools/obj2yaml/elf2yaml.cpp(GDB stopped only at the