similar to: [LLVMdev] Bitwidth analysis?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Bitwidth analysis?"

2008 Apr 12
0
[LLVMdev] Bitwidth analysis?
We have a bitwidth analysis that can be downloaded. It is not in LLVM. There should be a link in the paper: http://www.cs.utah.edu/~regehr/papers/pldi075-cooprider.pdf John Regehr
2008 Apr 12
1
[LLVMdev] Bitwidth analysis?
Dear John, thanks for pointing it to me. I just downloaded and installed CIL. However, I am getting an error when I run "make check", or when I try to compile the blink application, and I am sending you the error notice below. In any case, do you think it is possible to get some sort of 'dump' of the target C program with some bitwidth information, once I get your
2013 Jul 14
7
[Bug 833] New: iptables --with-kernel=/usr/src/linux against kernel {3.9.9, 3.10} fatal error: asm/cache.h: No such file or directory
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=833 Summary: iptables --with-kernel=/usr/src/linux against kernel {3.9.9, 3.10} fatal error: asm/cache.h: No such file or directory Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement
2007 Jun 08
2
[LLVMdev] Bitwidth of Machine Instructions
Hello, I am wondering if there is any way to figure out bitwidth of Machine Instructions. I see that ValueType information is available for nodes of DAG, but I couldn't find similar info for Machine Instructions. I particularly need this information for x86 target. I appreciate your help and comments in this regard. Thank you, Babak
2007 Jun 08
0
[LLVMdev] Bitwidth of Machine Instructions
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Babak Salamat wrote: > I am wondering if there is any way to figure out bitwidth of Machine > Instructions. I see that ValueType information is available for nodes > of DAG, but I couldn't find similar info for Machine Instructions. I > particularly need this information for x86 target. > I appreciate your help and comments in this regard. Do you mean the
2007 Jun 08
1
[LLVMdev] Bitwidth of Machine Instructions
On Jun 8, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Babak Salamat wrote: >> I am wondering if there is any way to figure out bitwidth of Machine >> Instructions. I see that ValueType information is available for nodes >> of DAG, but I couldn't find similar info for Machine Instructions. I >> particularly need this information for x86 target.
2007 Dec 03
1
[LLVMdev] lli interpreter crashed for integer type whose bitwidth > 64
Hi, The lli interpreter crashed for the following case: ; ModuleID = 'x.c' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32" target triple = "i686-pc-linux-gnu" define i32 @main() { entry: %retval = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=2] %tmp = alloca i32 ;
2011 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] A pass to minimize instruction bitwidth?
Does llvm have a pass that minimizes the bitwidth of llvm instructions? For instance:   %8 = and i32 %7, 63 63 is 111111 in binary. So the 'and' instruction only requires 6 bits. We could rewrite the above code as:   %8 = trunc i32 %7 to i6   %9 = and i6 %8, 63 Since we only need the lower 6 bits we could also propagate this change backwards to reduce the bitwidth of prior
2017 Apr 30
3
selinux problem policies
Hello, My problem is to add selinux policies can any help to say what is wrong with my policies I write this! semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_sys_rw_content_t "/var/www/html(/.*)?/ typo3conf(/.*)?" I have more instances from typo3 I found this construct in the selinux policies "/var/www/html(/.*)?/uploads(/.*)?" but my is not working ? and I have only errors? neverallow
2019 Mar 04
2
Add Bitwidth Attribute in Clang without Modification in Source Code of Clang
I've actually got an implementation of this as an arbitrary precision integer extension that I've written up an RFC for (but not submitted). Below is my copy/pasted RFC (again, not reviewed, but I DO have an implementation of it that I need to prepare for review). I suspect my implementation will do what you need out of it. Its actually more significant than just adding a normal
2008 Feb 14
2
[LLVMdev] Higher-level OCaml bindings
On Thursday 14 February 2008 16:33:25 Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Jon Harrop wrote: > > Does CLang use a suitable intermediate representation for this to be > > possible? > > The higher level IR that clang uses is basically a C AST. This interface > is under constant flux though. If you wanted to do this, it would be > very reasonable to just cons up
2004 Jul 10
3
[LLVMdev] GCC frontend
Chris, LLVM is an excellent piece of work, LLVM is one of the few project I know that has used the mysterious GCC front-end. I think it will be a great contribution to the community if you could writeup and document how to interface to the GCC front-end data-structures (like LLVM has done). Specifically: a) detail the gcc front-end tree data-structures b) how to go about interfacing to them
2017 Jan 19
2
SELinux upgrade
I have experienced this myself. It is very upsetting. (Sent from iPhone, so please accept my apologies in advance for any spelling or grammatical errors.) > On Jan 19, 2017, at 2:57 AM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote: > > log
2008 Feb 14
0
[LLVMdev] Higher-level OCaml bindings
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Jon Harrop wrote: >> is under constant flux though. If you wanted to do this, it would be >> very reasonable to just cons up some C code and send it through the clang >> parser. Clang works great in a JIT environment. > > Great! Sounds like CIL should do the trick: > > http://manju.cs.berkeley.edu/cil/ Huh? -Chris --
2006 Mar 03
2
Strange Expression
Hello, I have a dataframe with a column 'col' of expressions of the form 2*3+4*5+6*7 and substrings thereof. Now >eval(2*3+4*5+6*7) is ok. But I want it done on that column... nothing seems to work Even > cil <- dataframe$col >eval(cil[1]) 2*3+4*5+6*7 I want the elements of the column evaluated. Thanks, A. Mani Member, Cal. Math. Soc [[alternative HTML version
2004 Jul 10
0
[LLVMdev] GCC frontend
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Ramu Ramamurthy wrote: > LLVM is an excellent piece of work, Thanks! > LLVM is one of the few project I know that has used the mysterious GCC > front-end. I think it will be a great contribution to the community if > you could writeup and document how to interface to the GCC front-end > data-structures (like LLVM has done). Specifically: > > a)
2001 Apr 21
2
permisos de archivos ...
como puedo cambiar los permisos para un directorio de tal forma que en un cliente windows pueda leer, guardar pero no pueda borrar archivos??? _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Construye tu p?gina personal en Yahoo! GeoCities. ?Es f?cil, r?pido y gratis! http://geocities.yahoo.com.mx
2005 Mar 19
4
How I calculate nCr with R ? (Como calculo nCr con R? )
En espa?ol (In Spanish) Necesito calcular la en numeros de combinaciones de n cosas tomando k al tiempo. Como hago eso en R ??? Yo escrib? mi propia funci?n pero pienso que de esa forma no es f?cil para mis estudiantes . He estado buscando en la ayuda y no he encontrado informaci?n sobre una funci?n que calcule eso directamente. Podr?an ayudarme In English (en Ingl?s ) I need calculate
2005 Feb 08
1
Plotting estimated betas, standard error
Hello, I was wondering, is there a way to plot estimated betas and standard deviations that I've generated? Specifically, I have the following: A matrix of estimated betas (two different betas, 4 different simulations - categories). A matrix of estimated standard errors corresponding to each of those betas. I would like to plot the estimated beta, and make a confidence
2008 Feb 14
2
[LLVMdev] Higher-level OCaml bindings
I'm still meddling with different ways to exploit LLVM's awesome JIT compilation capabilities from OCaml. Although I've managed to get minimal compilers up and running with relatively little effort, I can't help but think that I'm spending a significant amount of time reinventing the C front-end. Would it make sense to have higher-level OCaml bindings to the current CLang