similar to: [LLVMdev] Proposal for GSoc project - Compile programs with LLVM compiler

hi, This e-mail is written to involve some of the project ideas in LLVM in GSOC this year. I was looking in to the ideas mentioned under improving current system and found the idea of "Compile programs with the LLVM Compiler" to be interesting. I would like to compile one of the large code bases that have not yet been compiled with LLVM and convert the build system to be compatible

On Mar 29, 2008, at 11:53 PM, Kumaripaba Miyurusara Atukorala wrote: > hi, > This e-mail is written to involve some of the project ideas in LLVM > in GSOC this year. > I was looking in to the ideas mentioned under improving current > system and found the idea of "Compile programs with the LLVM > Compiler" to be interesting. I would like to compile one of the

Kumaripaba Miyurusara Atukorala wrote: > > hello everybody, > > I'm planning to compile a large codebase (Ubuntu) with LLVM compiler > as my GSoc project 2008. I've given the my proposal below. I'll be > really great full if you can provide your feedback on improving this > proposal. > As Anton has said, Gentoo might be a better choice for this. But Ubuntu

Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2008, at 11:53 PM, Kumaripaba Miyurusara Atukorala wrote: > >> hi, >> This e-mail is written to involve some of the project ideas in LLVM >> in GSOC this year. >> I was looking in to the ideas mentioned under improving current >> system and found the idea of "Compile programs with the LLVM >> Compiler" to be

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Kumaripaba Miyurusara Atukorala <paba50 at gmail.com> wrote: > 1) I thought of taking the gcc compiler and compiling it with llvm since it > is easier to make test cases to test the system. Is gcc compiler already > built with llvm? if so I have the linux kernel as the second option. What is > your openion on this ? We rutinely compile linux

hi, Several doubts aroused after I read through all the information provided in former mails. They are > > >> > > I think this would be a great project. However, I would rephrase it > > to be more concrete. > > > > How about taking a linux distro like redhat or gentoo or whatever you > > are familiar of comfortable with, and try compiling the whole

Hello every body, With the ideas and suggestions that I got from you all I came up with the proposal for the project of improving the llvm-test testsuite. I am posting my proposal here, if you have any feedback(anything to be added or anything to be removed ) please let me know, so that I can improve the proposal before I upload it in Google web app. Thanks in advance.! Regarda, Rjika *Proposal

Hi, sounds like a nice project. Some comments below. > *1. Project title:* > Extend the llvm-test testsuite to include new programs and benchmaraks[1], benchmaraks -> benchmarks > and give a web service interface to run a test build remotely. Also, this is not a title, it is a summary. How about calling it: "Improve the llvm testsuite" > *2. Abstract:* > LLVM[2]

hello everybody, I would like to improve the llvm-test suite[1] as a part of GSoC 2008 program for LLVM. I have few concerns/problems regarding this, please give me your feedbacks and suggestions to come up with the proper proposal. *Goal:* Improve the llvm-test testsuite. *Idea:* Extend the llvm-test testsuite to include new programs and benchmarks[2]. Test programs should be more CPU intensive

On Mar 19, 2008, at 1:39 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > I would like to see: > > (1) LLVM testsuite run every night for all targets, target variants > and > operating systems, for example by using an emulator to emulate targets > for which the hardware is not available. The gcc project has a > compile > farm which might be usable for this, but we would need to ask them

I would like to see: (1) LLVM testsuite run every night for all targets, target variants and operating systems, for example by using an emulator to emulate targets for which the hardware is not available. The gcc project has a compile farm which might be usable for this, but we would need to ask them if it is ok. (2) Likewise for the gcc testsuite, with results emailed to the nightly test

Hello Everyone, I am looking forward to contribute to Xapian and also apply as a Google Summer of Code student. I would like to start by introducing myself. I am a final year M.Sc.(H) Chemistry and B.E. (H) Electronics and Instrumentation student at BITS - Pilani, Goa. I am interested in Machine Learning and presently pursuing my thesis on the same. I have been selected for Google Summer of Code

While on the subject of the testsuite, some random thoughts: - show how test results changed from one week and one month ago, and compared to the last release, rather than just comparing with the previous run as now. Good for spotting trends. - fix the testsuite so that buildlogs are really available: I occasionally see that a nightly tester failed the build, and in the message it gives a url

Hello every body, Thank you all for your great suggestions and feedbacks, I'd forward the detailed proposal within couple of days. And also if I need to clarify any thing I'll ask in the list. Thanks again. Regards, Rajika On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > While on the subject of the testsuite, some random thoughts: > > - show

Another suggestion: a web service that would allow you to submit a test build and it would provide you feedback on deviations from known good for that target. I know a lot of people keep two trees around for this purpose, and I'd personally like to ditch the duplicate if I could. -- Chris On Mar 21, 2008, at 9:22 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri wrote: > Hello every body, > Thank you all

Hi LLVM Developer Team, My name is Mark Babatunde and I'm a third year computer science student at the University of Pittsburgh. I was looking at the potential list of projects and the project regarding adding support for batch-testing to the LLDB testsuite caught my interest. I was wondering how I can get started and if I can get in contact with Jim Ingham. Best, Mark Mark Babatunde

Dear Tobias Grosser, Today I have rebuilt the LLVM-Polly in Release mode. The configuration of my own testing machine is: Intel Pentium Dual CPU T2390(1.86GHz) with 2GB DDR2 memory. I evaluated the Polly using PolyBench and Mediabench. It takes too long time to evaluate the whole LLVM-testsuite, so I just choose the Mediabench from LLVM-testsuite. The preliminary results of Polly compiling

On 03/19/2013 11:02 AM, Star Tan wrote: > > Dear Tobias Grosser, > > Today I have rebuilt the LLVM-Polly in Release mode. The configuration of my own testing machine is: Intel Pentium Dual CPU T2390(1.86GHz) with 2GB DDR2 memory. > I evaluated the Polly using PolyBench and Mediabench. It takes too long time to evaluate the whole LLVM-testsuite, so I just choose the Mediabench from

Dear prospective LLVM GSoC Mentors, The organization application period for GSoC 2020 will open on January, 14. This means that we're having some time to prepare the list of project ideas for the next year. When proposing the project please keep in mind the following criteria: 1. The project should serve both LLVM as a project and provide the relevant LLVM knowledge to the student. 2. The

Hello David, I believe Johannes already answered your questions, but just to clarify the things fully: yes, we are going to submit an application to participate in GSoC this year as usual. I will take care of necessary paperwork and stuff. Currently we're collecting the list of summer projects here and there. It's perfectly fine to have the lists from sub-projects to be posted on their