similar to: [LLVMdev] Removing llvm-upgrade

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Jan 26, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I agree that the list name is redundant and should be dropped, but >>>>> the revision number is compact and very useful... >>>>> >>>>> -Chris

On Jan 26, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: >>> >>>> I agree that the list name is redundant and should be dropped, but >>>> the revision number is compact and very useful... >>>> >>>> -Chris >>> >>> If we agreed to perform this change and we found the person who can change >>>

What, the deadline is tomorrow?!? The deadline for proposals snuck up on me, and I'm sure many of you forgot as well. Therefore, I am extending the deadline. I have received some great talk proposals, so keep them coming. However, I have very few tutorials, BoFs, posters, or lightening talk proposals. So please, get those proposals in and lets make this year the best developer meeting yet!

This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:40 AM

> You are the only one who response my problem. The others maybe don't > understand my questions....:( I'm also replying to the list. People are very nice and helpful! Plus, I am on vacation! :) > well....my questions are following. > 1. I wrote a very simple backend, but I dont know how to tell the llvm > compiler to use it. > I found something in "llc

Thanks for reply, Tanya. Frankly speaking, I have no good idea. While googling, I could find the term, "real backend", in the articles so wondered how this was different from just backend used in LLVM. (E.g., Mr.Olofson mentioned "glSDL/backend (the "real" backend version; not yet in mainstream SDL releases)" in this article

> This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html > > I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. I don't believe I can apply this patch. There have been several patches applied recently to TOT to allow MSVC 2005 which I think many people are using. Does this patch mean that one

I just wanted to let everyone know that we do plan to have a LLVM Developers' Meeting this year. We are currently planning for it to be held in the San Francisco Bay Area in the fall (Sept/Oct). No specific date has been selected yet, but an announcement will be made in the next month. We would not be able to have a free developers meeting without the generous contributions of companies

On May 19, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the > submitted > patches (mine or others) were applied. > So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? > Please provide me with a link to the patch(s) that need to be applied (llvm-commits archive email). I only apply patches that have been sent to me and

Dear Duncan, thank you very much. I have been able to use it now, via the following command line: clang -emit-llvm -c -fstack-protector canary.c -o canary.bc llc -print-before=stack-protector -print-after=stack-protector -o canary.s < canary.bc Thank you again, Izabela Maffra. On 26 January 2013 15:55, <llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Send LLVMdev mailing

Is that the reason for the down-time? Damn people running their compile jobs on llvm.org... :) On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > The LLVM demo page is currently disabled. I will notify the list if/when > it gets re-enabled. > > Thanks, > Tanya > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list

Thank you! It seems like new changes in .rst files are picked up quickly now. -- Alex On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 7:33 PM Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > This should all be fixed now. > > Thanks, > Tanya > > > On Feb 14, 2019, at 9:50 AM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > Yes, I am working on it. The sub-projects are still having

Hi, Got the same error, switching to https fixes the issue. Regards, ismail On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I haven’t gotten a lot of people mentioning this specific error, so I hope > others will speak up. > > What version of the svn client are you using? > > Thanks, > Tanya > > On Jun 27, 2017,

> I am very much happy to announce that my GSoC 2008 proposal[1] was accepted. > Thank you very much for accepting my proposal. > My mentor is Tanya Lattner. > I would like to know how should I communicate with my mentor( using this > dev-list, #llvm at Oftc.net or by any other means)? The best way is to use llvm-dev. The community may have some comments and suggestions regarding

As I saw from the mailing list the MSVC 2005 patches were made to take into account the new files from the development branch, files which are not in the 2.3 release. So for now the below patch is the only one functional for the release. If I am wrong, please someone correct me. If someone can make a 2005 patch for the release branch, it is ok. Else, I am afraid that this one is for now the

I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the submitted patches (mine or others) were applied. So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya M. Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 9:00 PM Subject:

Dear Tanya: > You also have a few CBE failures that I am not seeing. What version > of xcode do you have installed? Xcode 2.4.1 > Can you send me the following files? > SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/2008-01-07-LongDouble.* > SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/PR1386.* OK, I attached those files (llvm-2.2-test-output.tar.gz) Best regards, 2008/1/30, Tanya Lattner <tonic at

Just a reminder, please complete your testing by May 21st! Thanks, Tanya ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 00:25:41 -0700 From: Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: 2.3 Pre-release available for testing LLVMers, The 2.3 pre-release is available for testing:

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Tanya M. Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > LLVMers, > > The 2.4 pre-release is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.4/ > > If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. > Please do the following: > > 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use

The LLVM Foundation announces the eighth annual LLVM Developers' Meeting will be held October 28th and 29th in San Jose, CA. http://llvm.org/devmtg/2014-10/index.html This event is a forum for both developers and users of LLVM (and related projects) to meet, learn LLVM internals, learn how LLVM is used, and to exchange ideas about furthering development of LLVM and its potential