Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Compiling llvm-gcc on amd64 with 32 bits: assembler still carps"
2008 Mar 30
3
[LLVMdev] Compiling llvm-gcc on amd64 with 32 bits: assembler still carps
On Mar 30, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>
> Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 12:23 -0400 schrieb Daniel Berlin:
>> To clarify,
>>
>> configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu
>> --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu
>>
>> I do this all the time on my 4 core amd64 box and it works fine.
>
> There must be some other difference, as
2008 Mar 30
1
[LLVMdev] Compiling llvm-gcc on amd64 with 32 bits: assembler still carps
Hello, Joachim
> This assembler was configured for a target of `x86_64-linux-gnu'.
Hrm, try to check, how 'as' is invoked by llvm-gcc, you need jut to run
the mentioned cmdline 'by hands':
./xgcc -B./ -B/home/jo/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
-isystem /home/jo/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include
-isystem /home/jo/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include
-L/home/jo/llvm-gcc-wrk/gcc/../ld -O2 -DIN_GCC
2008 Mar 30
0
[LLVMdev] Compiling llvm-gcc on amd64 with 32 bits: assembler still carps
Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 10:28 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner:
> On Mar 30, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
> > Look at how $LLVM_CONFIGURE is built, the final value is
> >
> > --prefix=/home/jo --enable-optimized --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu
> > --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> >
>
> This looks likes its missing some
2008 Mar 30
2
[LLVMdev] Compiling llvm-gcc on amd64 with 32 bits: assembler still carps
On Mar 30, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>
> Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 10:28 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner:
>> On Mar 30, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>>> Look at how $LLVM_CONFIGURE is built, the final value is
>>>
>>> --prefix=/home/jo --enable-optimized --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu
>>> --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu
2008 Mar 31
0
[LLVMdev] Compiling llvm-gcc on amd64 with 32 bits: assembler still carps
Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 15:45 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner:
> On Mar 30, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>
> >
> > Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 10:28 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner:
> >> On Mar 30, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
> >>> Look at how $LLVM_CONFIGURE is built, the final value is
> >>>
> >>>
2008 Mar 31
2
[LLVMdev] Compiling llvm-gcc on amd64 with 32 bits: assembler still carps
On Mar 30, 2008, at 11:22 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>
> Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 15:45 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner:
>> On Mar 30, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 10:28 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner:
>>>> On Mar 30, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>>>>> Look at how
2008 Mar 31
0
[LLVMdev] Compiling llvm-gcc on amd64 with 32 bits: assembler still carps
Am Montag, den 31.03.2008, 00:02 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner:
> On Mar 30, 2008, at 11:22 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>
> > Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 15:45 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner:
> >> On Mar 30, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
> >>
> >>> OK, I now have
> >>>
> >>> LLVM_VERSION_INFO=kurier-bootstrap
2008 Mar 30
2
[LLVMdev] Compiling llvm-gcc on amd64 with 32 bits: assembler still carps
To clarify,
configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu
--target=i686-pc-linux-gnu
I do this all the time on my 4 core amd64 box and it works fine.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> It shoudl work fine if you set CC right and use --build --target
>
> --host == i686-pc-linux-gnu
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 30,
2008 Mar 30
0
[LLVMdev] Compiling llvm-gcc on amd64 with 32 bits: assembler still carps
Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 12:23 -0400 schrieb Daniel Berlin:
> To clarify,
>
> configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu
> --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu
>
> I do this all the time on my 4 core amd64 box and it works fine.
There must be some other difference, as I'm doing exactly that:
> > > export LLVM_GCC_SRC=$HOME/llvm-gcc-src
> >
2008 Apr 01
1
[LLVMdev] Compiling llvm-gcc on amd64 with 32 bits: assembler still carps
*bump*
Anybody got a clue?
I can post a full transcript of a shell session that reproduces the
error if that helps.
To reiterate the original problem: I'm trying to compile LLVM-GCC on an
Ubuntu 64-bit box, with a 32-bit target (to avoid potential problems
with PIC and such).
I get errors like
Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
as soon as the make process tries to assemble
2008 Mar 30
0
[LLVMdev] Compiling llvm-gcc on amd64 with 32 bits: assembler still carps
It shoudl work fine if you set CC right and use --build --target
--host == i686-pc-linux-gnu
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Joachim Durchholz <jo at durchholz.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I managed to navigate around all those issues with environment variables
> and such. llvm itself now builds and checks just fine, but I can't get
> llvm-gcc to compile.
>
>
2008 Mar 30
2
[LLVMdev] Compiling llvm-gcc on amd64 with 32 bits: assembler still carps
Hi all,
I managed to navigate around all those issues with environment variables
and such. llvm itself now builds and checks just fine, but I can't get
llvm-gcc to compile.
Trying to 'make' from .../gcc gives me:
./xgcc -B./ -B/home/jo/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
-isystem /home/jo/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include
-isystem /home/jo/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include
-L/home/jo/llvm-gcc-wrk/gcc/../ld
2008 Mar 23
0
[LLVMdev] Status of LLVM-GCC 4.2?
On Mar 22, 2008, at 3:37 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 22.03.2008, 09:45 -0500 schrieb Andrew Lenharth:
>> officially support for llvm-gcc4.0 has been dropped.
>> unofficially I still keep llvm-gcc4.0 compiling because I need it for
>> some stuff. But this will only last until I can use 4.2.
>
> OK, that's a clear roadmap.
>
Please do not rely
2008 Mar 21
3
[LLVMdev] Just got bitten by accidentally using the wrong gcc
I recommend you don't parse version strings. In fact I switch the
check to use AC_COMPILE precisely for the reason that gcc --version is
totally unreliable and vendor specific. For example, what's the
regular expression that tells you what the GCC version is:
i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1 (GCC) 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5470)
(Aspen 5470.3)
Per the rest of this thread, you can't
2019 Jan 20
2
Still hitting odd problems trying to install R 3.5.2 on Debian amd64 machine
My Emails a week or so back were about installing Rstudio and the R shiny server on Debian. I was using an old Toshiba laptop as a sandbox for that and it would only install i386 (same for Ubuntu). Using the information at https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian/ I did get to the point where I had R 3.5.2, Rstudio and the server on there (with some help from Dirk that is in the list archives).
2008 Mar 02
0
[LLVMdev] llvm/test: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
Joachim Durchholz wrote:
> Since llvm cannot generate code for amd64 at this time, this translates
> to an additional constraint on --target, restricting me to --target=i686
> only.
llvm can generate code for amd64, but shared libs don't work, and
bootstrapping doesn't work (PR1711).
Still, if you want to compile it as 32-bit, does it work if you run
configure like this (without
2008 Mar 22
2
[LLVMdev] Status of LLVM-GCC 4.2?
Am Samstag, den 22.03.2008, 09:45 -0500 schrieb Andrew Lenharth:
> officially support for llvm-gcc4.0 has been dropped.
> unofficially I still keep llvm-gcc4.0 compiling because I need it for
> some stuff. But this will only last until I can use 4.2.
OK, that's a clear roadmap.
Maybe the docs should be updated to reflect this status? They still present 4.0 as if it were the default
2008 Mar 20
0
[LLVMdev] Just got bitten by accidentally using the wrong gcc
On Mar 20, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just forgot to ./configure with CC=gcc-4.2 CXX=g++-4.2, getting the
> (broken-for-LLVM) gcc-4.1 as a compiler.
> The error message that I got was this:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/lib/VMCore'
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target
> `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/Release/bin/tblgen',
2004 Aug 29
1
Re: [R] R on gentoo amd64 (gcc 3.3.3) is unstable --- no!
Dear Dirk,
I have had the exactly same problem like Ivo and his solution worked for me.
Hence the USE=f77 flag is NOT a typo but a Gentoo quirk.
As far as modifying the configure script is concerned, I believe that it is certainly
possible to perform said check (if 'f77 --version == f2c' then die)
only on x86_64 platforms.
And I'd argue it is f2c's fault. AMD64 linux distros have
2004 Aug 29
1
Re: [R] R on gentoo amd64 (gcc 3.3.3) is unstable --- no!
My appologies, this estimation is about right,
I spent last week at COMPSTAT in prague and didn't follow the list
closely.
Inspite of this fact I believe my posting is not entirely out of date.
regards
Diman Todorov
------------------------------
You are 8 days behind the times -- take a look at the current R-devel.
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Diman Todorov wrote:
> Dear Dirk,
> I