similar to: [LLVMdev] GSoC Proposal: Language bindings via. SWIG

If SWIG can be made to do a good job with Python/Ruby/Perl etc bindings around LLVM, I would be very interested in this. I'm personally interested in seeing both Python and Ruby bindings, and in having them be as easily maintained as possible. I think it would be interesting to see what the SWIG-style solution can do in this direction as opposed to the C-binding approach. If it results in

To anyone on #llvm I'm sure I'm starting to sound like a broken record, but I'd just like to point out that for python bindings at least, you can quite easily manipulate the LLVM infrastructure via ctypes as a shared object / dll -- no C required! Those of us interested in talking to LLVM from Lisps, either Common Lisp (via CFFI) or a scheme like PLT/Mzscheme, can also use the shared

Hello all, I am interested in the project: SWIG-based java bindings. It says a few things of Java bindings generated by SWIG don't work. Could you point out which particular part does not work? -- Best Regards, Sabrina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

> but I'd just like to point out that for python bindings at least, you > can quite easily manipulate the LLVM infrastructure via ctypes as a > shared object / dll -- no C required! Those of us interested in talking ctypes brings with it it's own troubles. To use it in any non-trivial way, one must write enough non-trivial wrapper code in Python. Performance is also affected

I recently wrote a post on installing "Git for Windows" on a legacy XP SP3 Home box. http://nurmi-labs.blogspot.com/2016/11/git.html I added some missing files from the MSYS2 packages which were removed for the downloadable "Git for Windows" installer and a compiler and some additional libraries. For other utilities (bison, flex, info, m4, make, and csh/tcsh), and code I

REMINDER: wxruby-swig is an experimental rewrite of wxRuby, using SWIG. It is not yet useful. The official wxRuby is still at 0.2.1. The 0.0.3 release of wxruby-swig is able to run the "minimal.rb" sample, which includes menu event handling. As always, it is available at: http://qualitycode.com/repos/wxruby-swig/ I also created a tarball this time, so you can just download that and

(Mostly for Roy): I saw this on the SWIG list, and wonder if it might be related to the problems we have been seeing where multi-arg typemaps end up invoking the wrong wrapper methods. (Not the newly-discovered directorout stuff). Perhaps if we switched to "compactdefaultargs" things would start to work more sanely. Looking at this section of the SWIG docs, it looks like it should

In trying to add wxTextCtrl to wxruby-swig, I''ve been running into a problem with the argument conversion that appears to be a SWIG director bug. It is tied to multiple inheritance, and is related to SWIG specifically making director''s ''initialize'' take a first argument, but because ''initialize'' is static there isn''t a self value

I just get the latest version of Xapian 1.2.2 and see that the Java bindings still aren't in a package. Do these work? I am trying to hack them into a package but I can't find where the actual swig -java command is being executed from to add the -package command. Any ideas? -- Jarrod Roberson www.vertigrated.com/blog

You can''t rake without swig now. I keep swig out of my path so I can do a build without swig to be sure it works with the download. Exception `Errno::ENOENT'' at ./rake/rakewx.rb:20 - No such file or directory - swig -version No such file or directory - swig -version ./rake/rakewx.rb:20:in ``'' ./rake/rakewx.rb:20:in `have_good_swig'' ./rake/rakewx.rb:254:in

I have a minimal working version of a SWIG-based wxRuby that can bring up an empty Frame with a title. On my system, it crashes on exit. I suspect this is the same problem that I mentioned months ago when I first upgraded to wxWindows 2.4.2. The problem mysteriously vanished at some point, but now it is back. I fiddled with this new code for several frustrating hours, and couldn''t

Hi, all I didn't get any response from swig for my question. see if I can get some help here Thanks ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: charlie <charlie.xia.fdu@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:55 PM Subject: SWIG with R and C++ STL To: swig-user@lists.sourceforge.net Hi all, I am new to SWIG. I encountered some problem when I try to SWIG to R some C++ modules. Here

I have some conditional code based on the SWIG version. Current versions of SWIG 1.3.30 still don''t fix %trackobjects correctly so I''m going to remove the test for now so it builds correctly with my version of SWIG. Hopefully before 1.3.30 is released we''ll have a better trackobjects in SWIG. Roy _______________________________________________ wxruby-users

Hi, I'm confused about my licensing obligation with respect to the Xapian SWIG bindings. I've got a python wrapper that sits above the standard Xapian Python/SWIG bindings, and I wasn't sure if the *intent* of the Xapian team is that my python wrapper - and any code that also uses my wrapper also falls under GPLv2. It seems unclear if the FSF's position on dynamic linking in

I''ve checked a number of new .i files into the wxruby-swig tree. Not all of them are fully tested, but I thought it would be better for them to be there than to have somebody start duplicating the work. I''ve also added the ''caret'' and ''image'' samples, as well as the generic etc/test.rb. These need the unreleased SWIG-1.3.22. The current

I did some testing this morning, and wasn''t happy with the error messages presented to the user if they didn''t have the right SWIG version. I realized that the detection was happening at the wrong place in the code. We were detecting the swig version while *creating* the swig tasks, rather than while *executing* a swig task. This led to misleading output from rake. So I moved

I compiled a C++ SWIG interface. It works fine from irb (interactive Ruby). But, I''d like to embed this Swig module into a Rails application. (I did not write this particular Rails application and know very little about Rails per-se.) I know that, to start WEBrick, you say ruby script/server I looked at script/server and it does not look like the right place to stick the

I just pushed a new wxruby-swig, which includes the known MSWin rakefile changes. It also has some significant internal improvements that will make it easier to add classes, and it includes support for one new class (wxEvent). wxruby-swig is now licensed under the "MIT license". wxRuby will remain under the wxWindows license as long as we are releasing the old code base. When we

A few days ago, someone asked me why I am using wxpp instead of SWIG. The question prompted me to revisit and re-evaluate SWIG, and I now believe it would be best to convert wxRuby to SWIG. SWIG has greatly improved its C++ support since the last time I looked at it, and I think its Ruby support has improved quite a bit as well. Also, now that I have written wxpp, I understand the nature of

After seeing contributions from Dmitry and Alex, I''m wondering how we can better organize and encourage user contributions. ORGANIZING Maybe identifying what is still missing in wxRuby-SWIG and publishing a prioritized todo list could useful to contributors. GETTING NOTICED It might be useful to post a link to the unassigned todo list each month to comp.lang.ruby and ask for