similar to: [LLVMdev] testsuite problems after merge

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] testsuite problems after merge"

2008 Mar 20
0
[LLVMdev] testsuite problems after merge
These should be fixed now. Sorry for the mess. -bw On Mar 20, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > I'm seeing ~100 new failures in the gcc testsuite due to the test > file being doubled or tripled, as below. This appears to affect > only files that were newly imported from gcc-4.2 in the recent > merge. Does anybody have an idea for how to mechanize fixing these
2008 Mar 20
0
[LLVMdev] testsuite problems after merge
On Mar 20, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > I'm seeing ~100 new failures in the gcc testsuite due to the test > file being doubled or tripled, as below. This appears to affect > only files that were newly imported from gcc-4.2 in the recent > merge. Does anybody have an idea for how to mechanize fixing these > (I doubt you can count on the APPLE LOCAL
2009 Jul 25
2
[LLVMdev] GCC DejaGNU regressions
The GCC DejaGNU testsuite has discovered some regressions. Here's one; this was reduced from testsuite/gcc.apple/4656532.c: typedef long long __m64 __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (8), __may_alias__)); static __inline __m64 __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__)) _mm_slli_si64 (__m64 __m, int __count) { } __m64 x, y; void t1(int n) { y = _mm_slli_si64(x, n); } Compiled with
2009 Aug 15
5
Compiling old wine versions in opensuse 11.1
dear forum I am hoping somebody can help me compile relatively old versions of wine (~0.9.10 -> 0.9.23) on openSuSE 11.1. I have a dual boot of opensuse 11.1 x86_32 and x86_64 and have had no luck with either. I have successfully compiled wine 1.1.11 but have have the same failure with 0.9.10 and 0.9.20. Code: > ./configure --prefix=/usr --x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib
2012 Dec 04
0
[LLVMdev] radr://12777299, "potential pthread/eh bug exposed by libsanitizer"
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:36:18AM -0800, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > Currently the replacement of allocation routines is based on creating > a new malloc zone and a new CFAllocator (because the allocator > replacement is done later than it could be, we must have both). This > makes us depend on CoreFoundation to call CFAllocatorSetDefault. > Because of some bugs in CF which start
2008 Nov 02
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-2.4 prerelease gfortran results
Building the prerelease of llvm-gcc 2.4 on Intel darwin9 with the following patch... --- llvm-gcc-4.2-2.3.999-20081024.source/gcc/stub-c.c.org 2008-10-30 18:55:45.000000000 -0400 +++ llvm-gcc-4.2-2.3.999-20081024.source/gcc/stub-c.c 2008-10-30 18:57:29.000000000 -0400 @@ -157,3 +157,27 @@ { gcc_assert(0); } + + +bool cvt_utf8_utf16 (const unsigned char *, size_t, unsigned char **, +
2005 Sep 11
1
Compile cvs version
Hi ! After download latest version from cvs compile fails: make[2]: Entering directory `/backup/privat/emulator/wine/dlls/activeds' gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__ -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fno-strict-aliasing -gstabs+ -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -o activeds_main.o activeds_main.c ../../tools/winebuild/winebuild -D__WINESRC__
2010 Sep 22
4
[LLVMdev] Running gcc tests using Clang
I've run the tests from clang-tests/trunk/gcc-4_2-testsuite on a Ubuntu x86-64 Linux box with the following results: === gcc Summary === # of expected passes 29946 # of unexpected failures 9938 # of unexpected successes 29 # of expected failures 28 # of unresolved testcases 1451 # of untested testcases 273 # of unsupported tests 811 pid is 4456
2010 May 03
0
[LLVMdev] `make check' failures in r102924
On May 3, 2010, at 10:43 AMPDT, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: > I successfully built LLVM (r102824) with > > ./configure --enable-optimized --enable-targets=host --with-built-clang > > on Fedora 12 on an Athlon64 processor. (The clang is the 2.7 pre-built > version.) and the llvm-gcc appears to be also? > However, running `make check' produced 6 unexpected failures
2010 May 03
2
[LLVMdev] `make check' failures in r102924
I successfully built LLVM (r102824) with ./configure --enable-optimized --enable-targets=host --with-built-clang on Fedora 12 on an Athlon64 processor. (The clang is the 2.7 pre-built version.) However, running `make check' produced 6 unexpected failures (see below). If there's something you'd like me to do, just holler. --- Vladimir FAIL:
2005 Sep 01
2
Wine 20050830 compilation fails
Hello all. The latest version of wine (both CVS and tarball) doesn't compile on my machine (2.6.13 kernel, gcc 3.3.4). I get an error in dlls/wldap32: gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__ -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fno-strict-aliasing -gstabs+ -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -o add.o add.c In file included from add.c:39:
2006 May 25
5
Wine 0.9.14.compile error (fatal)
Tried to compile the lastest wine and gcc choked up on it as follows: gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -I/usr/X11R6/include -D__WINESRC__ -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -gstabs+ -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -o baseshader.o baseshader.c baseshader.c: In function `print_glsl_info_log': baseshader.c:688: error: `GL_OBJECT_INFO_LOG_LENGTH_ARB' undeclared (first
2010 May 23
4
creating a reverse geometric sequence
Hello, Can anyone think of a non-iterative way to generate a decreasing geometric sequence in R? For example, for a hypothetical function dg, I would like: > dg(20) [1] 20 10 5 2 1 where I am using integer division by 2 to get each subsequent value in the sequence. There is of course: dg <- function(x) { res <- integer() while(x >= 1) { res <- c(res, x) x
2007 Apr 25
2
assigning two conditions to grep()
Hi, i have a problem in assigning 2 conditions to grep() , my data look like this: DA 24 N7 Rad= 3.4 20 Sac= 0.93 Acc= 4.76 DA 24 N7 Rad= 3.4 14 Sac= 0.65 Acc= 3.33 DA 24 N7 Rad= 3.4 3 Sac= 0.14 Acc= 0.71 DA 24 N7 Rad= 3.4 11 Sac= 0.51 Acc= 2.62 DG 23 N7 Rad= 3.4 8 Sac= 0.37 Acc= 1.91 DG 23 N7 Rad= 3.4 5 Sac= 0.23 Acc= 1.19 DG 23 N7 Rad= 3.4 0 Sac= 0.00 Acc= 0.00 DG 23 N7 Rad= 3.4 3 Sac=
2008 Aug 18
1
[LLVMdev] Beginner question: request guidance on how to trace 'make check' failure in SVN build
Greetings everybody, I'm at beginner level with LLVM and tried to build the sources from SVN revision 54920 on Fedora 9 (kernel 2.6.25-14.fc9.x86_64) running on Intel Q6600 @ 2.40GHz processor. LLVM build using 'make -j 4' was successful. However, during 'make check', a test case failed. The relevant snippets appear below. Can someone please point me to any links on how the
2007 Mar 19
3
64 bit compilation SUSE 10.2
Greetings All, I am attempting to compile wine under the SUSE 10.2 64 bit distribution, and am running into a bit of a problem. I have installed every 32 bit library that I could find in the distro, including the xorg-X11 libs. I ran the following commands: ./configure --prefix=/usr --x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib make depend && make The compilation chugs away for about 15 min,
2011 Sep 15
1
winbind: problems with group names
Hi, I am running a 3.6.0 server as a member of a Samba4 domain controller and am noticing some behaviour that I do not understand (the domain is FB5, the domain member servers's name is tango) It took me some time to get winbind showing domain users and groups but finally with backend idmap_rid it is _nearly_ working. `getent passwd' and `gentent group' list domain users and groups:
2005 Jul 05
1
Getting runtime error in stepclass
Hi! I got the following runtime error when I tried to use svm method with stepclass. Error in "colnames<-"(`*tmp*`, value = c("0", "1")) : attempt to set colnames on object with less than two dimensions I repeated the same sequence of statements but this time I used the classification function used in the example, i.e., "lda" and it worked fine
2010 May 03
2
[LLVMdev] `make check' failures in r102924
on 05/03/2010 11:13 AM Dale Johannesen said the following: > On May 3, 2010, at 10:43 AMPDT, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: > > >> I successfully built LLVM (r102824) with >> >> ./configure --enable-optimized --enable-targets=host --with-built-clang >> >> on Fedora 12 on an Athlon64 processor. (The clang is the 2.7 pre-built >> version.) > > and
2008 Nov 02
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-2.4 prerelease gfortran results
Anton, With regard to the gfortran test cases which don't fail on x86_64 Linux, these are the exact gfortran.log entries for them under i686 Darwin9... > FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_12.f90 -O0 (internal compiler error) > FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_12.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) Executing on host: