similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM Python binding

I'd might think about that, I have created quite a few Python bindings and, oddly enough, do enjoy it, probably just because of how easy boost::python makes it (I have always manually done it directly using that, but because of the sheer size of LLVM I may use a code generator to generate the basics, and yes I know how to manually create python C modules without any binder, but boost::python

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I''m looking into using puppet to deploy different python applications to different servers. I want to be able to sandbox the different applications using virtenv. A basic setup would be: 1. create user 2. install the virtual environment for that user - -> as the user: virtualenv /userdir 3. Install package dependencies. - -> as

Hello, as of Jul 9, the LNT build bot on SystemZ shows red. The problem occurs in the "setup lit" test, which fails due to: Processing dependencies for LNT==0.4.2.dev0 Searching for typing Reading https://pypi.org/simple/typing/ Downloading

Hi, I noticed that easy_install of lnt 0.4.1dev doesn't work: # easy_install lnt==0.4.1dev Searching for lnt==0.4.1dev Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/lnt/ No local packages or download links found for lnt==0.4.1dev error: Could not find suitable distribution for Requirement.parse('lnt==0.4.1dev') -Gabriel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Dear Community members, I am trying to setup *lnt* on a system where I do not have sudo access. I am facing the following issue. Kindly suggest a solution. virtualenv version => 1.11.6 OS => Debian with kernel 3.16.7 *While installing lnt into a virtual environment, I am getting the following error -* *Processing six-1.9.0.tar.gz* *Writing /tmp/easy_install-ZBhMFI/six-1.9.0/setup.cfg*

I've some trouble with installing numpy in python 3.3 on Centos 6.8 as installation request a different python version... [root at sge ~]$ yum install python33 python33-python-tools [root at sge ~]$ scl enable python33 bash ===== *this load Python 3.3.2* === [root at sge ~]$ easy_install pip [root at sge ~]$ pip install numpy Collecting numpy Using cached numpy-1.12.0.zip

Hi, working on the LNT documentation I am wondering about a few things: - LNT documentation recommends to do `easy_install lnt==0.4.2dev` (in the install box on the left side of the title page). The last available version of LNT on pypy is version 0.4.0 from 2012. Are there plans to keep this up to date or should we better remove the entry and not mention pypy packages anymore? - Building the

I'd be fine pulling the pypi (sic) entry, shall I make it so? - Daniel On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:06 AM Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote: > Yep, we should pull that package down, or start to update it. > > The docs builds work for me. Is it possible that is not in your venv or > something like that? > > > On Jul 18, 2017, at 10:48 AM, Matthias

I updated the docs to show a pip/svn install like this: pip install svn+http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/lnt/trunk <svn+http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/lnt/trunk> > On Jul 18, 2017, at 11:24 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > > >> On 18 Jul 2017, at 20:21, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org <mailto:daniel at zuster.org>> wrote:

Hi, I would like to share my experimental LLVM API Python bindings with the LLVM enthusiasts. I have created Boost.Python wrappers largely for the VMCore interface and other selected interfaces (e.g. ExecutionEngine). The bindings provide direct runtime access to the LLVM bytecode and JIT execution features from Python. The bindings are complete enough so that one can e.g. run the Fibonacci

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Python in version 3.5 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart ---------- You can get started in three easy steps: $ sudo yum install centos-release-scl $ sudo yum install rh-python35 $ scl

Jarno, This looks like it could be very valuable - thanks for making it available. Just out of curiosity, do you have any specific uses in mind for which you created these bindings? --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ On Feb 23, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Jarno Seppänen wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to share my experimental LLVM API Python bindings with >

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of versions 2.7, 3.3 and 3.4 of the Python on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64 and CentOS Linux 7 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart ---------- You can get started in three easy steps (example of Python 3.4): $ sudo yum install

On 12.03.20 19:09, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 21:39 +0100, Thomas Koeller wrote: > IMO, the idea itself sounds not the best... one must assume that such > invoked programs are not written "safe"... and thus an attacker could > potentially cause the system to run such programs a huge number of > times. As the anticipated action of the program is

Hi Tanya, The new type-legalization mode (-promote-elements) which enables vector-select in LLVM (and a nice perf boost for several workloads), is currently disabled because of a _single_ bug in the ARM codegen which makes a few tests fail. If ARM is not a supported target, can I mark these tests as 'XFAIL' and enable vector-select support in LLVM ? Thanks, Nadav -----Original

I appear to have written code which travels backwards through time: http://www.vimeo.com/742590 This disturbs me immensely. If anyone can explain it, that would be cool. I think it''s an illusion brought about by how RSpec wraps the code it executes, and by the sheer weirdness of continuations. -- Giles Bowkett Blog: http://gilesbowkett.blogspot.com Portfolio:

Is it will known and accepted that before_save triggers should return true? I didn''t notice this before but now I see it in the documentation. Here is what I''m doing in my model: def before_save if self.has_album? self.visible = self.album.visible? end end That results in the expected result when album.visible? is true - but not when it is false. To make it

Hello all, I am involved in a compiler project for Transport Triggered Architectures (think VLIW and you are pretty close), and we are considering using LLVM. Browsing the list archives, I noticed an announcement of Python bindings for LLVM 1.5. Does anyone know the current status of the bindings? -- Pertti

And last thing i forgot. Is this server having multiple interfaces ? Yes, set in smb.conf interfaces = 127.0.0.1 bind interfaces only = No and can you post the complete krb5.conf again. I did not see in libdefaults. dns_lookup_kdc = true dns_lookup_realm = false Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org]

W dniu 20.08.2015 o 13:26, Mauricio Tavares pisze: > On Aug 20, 2015 6:54 AM, "ken" <gebser at mousecar.com> wrote: >> >> One of the build options for a laptop I'm looking at buying is DVD vs > Blu-Ray. I've never used Blue-ray before, so is there some compelling > reason, as a Linux guy, to want to get Blu-ray? > First of all, is this going