similar to: [LLVMdev] 2 experimental projects

>> In case of the llvm tests the situation is somewhat more >> complicated, since dejagnu is driving the process, and >> dejagnu hinders us in a direct $(MAKE) invocation, so >> it falls back to -j1. My approach is thus using dejagnu >> to build up makefiles in test/.../Output/... and when >> these makefiles are executed by $(MAKE) we will >> get the

On Oct 18, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Hi all, > > As you may or may not have noticed, I have gradually been replacing > the testing infrastructure in LLVM. Most of this work is moving LLVM > and Clang to share a single testing tool, 'lit'. See: > http://llvm.org/cmds/lit.html > for documentation on the tool itself. > > If you haven't already

Hi all, As you may or may not have noticed, I have gradually been replacing the testing infrastructure in LLVM. Most of this work is moving LLVM and Clang to share a single testing tool, 'lit'. See: http://llvm.org/cmds/lit.html for documentation on the tool itself. If you haven't already tried it, please consider switch to 'make check-lit' as an alternative to 'make

> > Cons of QMTest: > > 1) You have to use the gui to add directories. > > I think you're wrong. Manually creating a directory would work, as QMTest does > not place anything special in directories. I may have worded this poorly, but I think you have to use the gui to add new directories or tests, or specific tests. Otherwise, it does not know what to do with those

It's me. Our ISD::LABEL implementation has issues... Evan On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:34 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:12 PM, Apache wrote: > >> http://llvm.org/nightlytest/test.php?machine=231&night=4754 >> Name: il0102a-dhcp80.apple.com >> Nickname: OldGrawp-O0-PIC >> Buildstatus: OK >> >> New Test Passes: >>

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: >> Do to popular request, I just set up a new mailing list to capture the >> nightly tester output from the various testers running 'round the world. >> The new list is available here: >> http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults >> >> If you're running a nightly tester, please update

On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Evan Cheng wrote: > But I am using llvm-gcc-4.2. Any idea why it's failing? > > Evan All the failing testers are using gcc-4.0 according to the web pages they point at. > On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:24 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > >> On Feb 16, 2008, at 7:06 AM, Apache wrote: >>> New Test Failures: >>>

On Feb 16, 2008, at 7:06 AM, Apache wrote: > New Test Failures: > test/C++Frontend/2008-02-13-sret.cpp [DEJAGNU] This test doesn't work with gcc-4.0, which caused it to fail on a number of testers overnight. I can fix that in 4.0, but as I understand it we're going to drop support for it next release, so how about now?

Can any one, who has dejagnu and expect installed and working, send me an output when running '(g)make check' from llvm. Thanks. Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach LLVM Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= 'Nothing is impossible; The impossible

On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:12 PM, Apache wrote: > http://llvm.org/nightlytest/test.php?machine=231&night=4754 > Name: il0102a-dhcp80.apple.com > Nickname: OldGrawp-O0-PIC > Buildstatus: OK > > New Test Passes: > test/CFrontend/2008-01-28-PragmaMark.c [DEJAGNU] > > > New Test Failures: > Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/except [LLC compile, ] >

> Do to popular request, I just set up a new mailing list to capture the > nightly tester output from the various testers running 'round the world. > The new list is available here: > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults > > If you're running a nightly tester, please update your crontab to send > mail to the llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu list

On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 19:52, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi Reid, > > I'll send a complete report tommorow, its getting late. Great! > > It looks like there is alot of work to do to get the MS VC version in line > with the Unix release. I am very willing to help out with porting. Yes, there are several well known issues remaining. The bugpoint tool and the debugger use unix

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:26:02AM -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Feb 24, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Julien Lerouge wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 06:24:17PM -0800, Julien Lerouge wrote: > >> I haven't tested with objdir != srcdir. > > > > Ok, that was broken. Attached is a smaller diff that should work in > > all > > cases. > > This

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:02:18PM -0800, Julien Lerouge wrote: > For 2), I think the NewNightlyTest.pl script would require some small > changes, to invoke the jcheck target instead of check, pass the desired > -j flag, and also parse the log. I'll take a look. In any case, the > changes would only apply to the DejaGNU tests (llvm-test already works > fine with -jX). Here is

llvm itself is built with gcc-4.0, but the run line is: // RUN: %llvmgxx -S -O0 -emit-llvm %s -o - | grep retval | grep S242 | grep {i32 1} | count 2 According the log: FAIL: /Volumes/Muggles/LLVM/nightlytest-pic/build/llvm/test/C+ +Frontend/2008-02-13-sret.cpp Failed with exit(1) at line 1 while running: /usr/local/bin/llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -S -O0 -emit-llvm /

Hi All, Do to popular request, I just set up a new mailing list to capture the nightly tester output from the various testers running 'round the world. The new list is available here: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults If you're running a nightly tester, please update your crontab to send mail to the llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu list (potentially in addition

But I am using llvm-gcc-4.2. Any idea why it's failing? Evan On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:24 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Feb 16, 2008, at 7:06 AM, Apache wrote: >> New Test Failures: >> test/C++Frontend/2008-02-13-sret.cpp [DEJAGNU] > > This test doesn't work with gcc-4.0, which caused it to fail on a > number of testers overnight. I can fix that in 4.0, but as I

Tanya Lattner wrote: > I've finished adding the -rundejagnu option to the nightly tester script, > which was the last step to fully support Dejagnu. I think now is the > appropriate time to discuss keeping QMTest or switching to Dejagnu. A lot > of work went into using QMTest, so I think we should make this decision > carefully and before the 1.4 release. > > Here are the

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > On Oct 18, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> If you haven't already tried it, please consider switch to 'make >> check-lit' as an alternative to 'make check'. If it doesn't work for >> you, or you find it doesn't do something DejaGNU did and you like,

On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Henrik Bach wrote: > I found that it was runtest.exp which referenced to the internal exp_debug > function. For testing purposes I disabled the reference and ran a new: Hi Henrik, Unfortunately, none of us has access to a MinGW setup, so we cannot debug this problem. If you're hacking on dejagnu or expect itself (because it has not yet been ported to MinGW