similar to: [LLVMdev] Proposal for GSoC project for improving llvm-test testsuite

> Just my two cents. From time to time I'm testing LLVM via > compiling & running such big beasts as Qt and Mozilla. Also, > at 2.0 time I tried to compile & test bunch of software from > KDE and many others. I tried to compile the 3D game engine "darkplaces" with llvm-gcc 4.2, but the produced binary didn't work. However, I didn't find out how debug

Am Mittwoch, den 19.03.2008, 14:49 +0100 schrieb Holger Schurig: > > Just my two cents. From time to time I'm testing LLVM via > > compiling & running such big beasts as Qt and Mozilla. Also, > > at 2.0 time I tried to compile & test bunch of software from > > KDE and many others. > > I tried to compile the 3D game engine "darkplaces" with

> "Didn't work" means... what? Compilation failed? Program doesn't work? > Either way: what mesages do you get? The graphical screen was just blank. darkplaces emits some log messages as usual. But step by step... Used LLVM-GCC ------------- The used llvm-gcc, when run with "llmv-gcc --version" shows "llvm-gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5546)

Am Mittwoch, den 19.03.2008, 10:22 +0530 schrieb Rajika Kumarasiri: > 2. As described llvm testsuite program should be more CPU intensive > programs, is there is any reason for that and how a llvm test suite > program can make more CPU intensive, any points that should consider > to write a more CPU intensive test program for llvm? I guess that's just trying to get the most

I would like to see: (1) LLVM testsuite run every night for all targets, target variants and operating systems, for example by using an emulator to emulate targets for which the hardware is not available. The gcc project has a compile farm which might be usable for this, but we would need to ask them if it is ok. (2) Likewise for the gcc testsuite, with results emailed to the nightly test

While on the subject of the testsuite, some random thoughts: - show how test results changed from one week and one month ago, and compared to the last release, rather than just comparing with the previous run as now. Good for spotting trends. - fix the testsuite so that buildlogs are really available: I occasionally see that a nightly tester failed the build, and in the message it gives a url

Hi, sounds like a nice project. Some comments below. > *1. Project title:* > Extend the llvm-test testsuite to include new programs and benchmaraks[1], benchmaraks -> benchmarks > and give a web service interface to run a test build remotely. Also, this is not a title, it is a summary. How about calling it: "Improve the llvm testsuite" > *2. Abstract:* > LLVM[2]

On Mar 19, 2008, at 1:39 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > I would like to see: > > (1) LLVM testsuite run every night for all targets, target variants > and > operating systems, for example by using an emulator to emulate targets > for which the hardware is not available. The gcc project has a > compile > farm which might be usable for this, but we would need to ask them

Another suggestion: a web service that would allow you to submit a test build and it would provide you feedback on deviations from known good for that target. I know a lot of people keep two trees around for this purpose, and I'd personally like to ditch the duplicate if I could. -- Chris On Mar 21, 2008, at 9:22 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri wrote: > Hello every body, > Thank you all

hello everybody, I would like to improve the llvm-test suite[1] as a part of GSoC 2008 program for LLVM. I have few concerns/problems regarding this, please give me your feedbacks and suggestions to come up with the proper proposal. *Goal:* Improve the llvm-test testsuite. *Idea:* Extend the llvm-test testsuite to include new programs and benchmarks[2]. Test programs should be more CPU intensive

Hello every body, Thank you all for your great suggestions and feedbacks, I'd forward the detailed proposal within couple of days. And also if I need to clarify any thing I'll ask in the list. Thanks again. Regards, Rajika On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > While on the subject of the testsuite, some random thoughts: > > - show

Hello every body, With the ideas and suggestions that I got from you all I came up with the proposal for the project of improving the llvm-test testsuite. I am posting my proposal here, if you have any feedback(anything to be added or anything to be removed ) please let me know, so that I can improve the proposal before I upload it in Google web app. Thanks in advance.! Regarda, Rjika *Proposal

Hi LLVM Developer Team, My name is Mark Babatunde and I'm a third year computer science student at the University of Pittsburgh. I was looking at the potential list of projects and the project regarding adding support for batch-testing to the LLDB testsuite caught my interest. I was wondering how I can get started and if I can get in contact with Jim Ingham. Best, Mark Mark Babatunde

Hello, My name is Nihal. I am a 4th year, CSE undergraduate student at National Institute of Technology Surathkal (NITK). I am proficient in C/C++/Java/PHP languages. Looking through GSOC organizations and projects. I came across Xapian. I have looked through the project list for GSOC'17. Improving Xapian's PHP Bindings project looked right for me. I have been reading up on the resources

Hello everybody. Last monday I sent an email to the LLVM dev mailing list saying that I was looking forward to working on these GSoC projects: *Advanced Heuristics for Ordering Compiler Optimization Passes* and *Machine learning and compiler optimizations: using inter-procedural analysis to select optimization* I currently do an undergraduate research on compiler autotuning of Rust code, more

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46956 Bug #: 46956 Summary: Selecting 2xAntiAliasing causes Nexuiz to crash "X Error: BadMatch, failed request (X_CreateWindow)" Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status:

hi, This e-mail is written to involve some of the project ideas in LLVM in GSOC this year. I was looking in to the ideas mentioned under improving current system and found the idea of "Compile programs with the LLVM Compiler" to be interesting. I would like to compile one of the large code bases that have not yet been compiled with LLVM and convert the build system to be compatible

On Mar 29, 2008, at 11:53 PM, Kumaripaba Miyurusara Atukorala wrote: > hi, > This e-mail is written to involve some of the project ideas in LLVM > in GSOC this year. > I was looking in to the ideas mentioned under improving current > system and found the idea of "Compile programs with the LLVM > Compiler" to be interesting. I would like to compile one of the

Kumaripaba Miyurusara Atukorala wrote: > > hello everybody, > > I'm planning to compile a large codebase (Ubuntu) with LLVM compiler > as my GSoc project 2008. I've given the my proposal below. I'll be > really great full if you can provide your feedback on improving this > proposal. > As Anton has said, Gentoo might be a better choice for this. But Ubuntu

Hello, I am currently working on LLVM as a placement student for a year and would love to continue to do so after my placement ends. GSoc seems like an excellent opportunity for this. After looking at the open projects page, I would like to propose working on improving coverage reports. http://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html#coverage Is this project ideal for GSoc and if so, will there be a mentor