Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] OCaml "make install" failure"
2008 Mar 17
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] ocamldoc code needs to be added for every subdirectory in the ocaml bindings.
Here's a patch that'll fix the bug you're running into. Could someone
commit?
---
bindings/ocaml/transforms/Makefile | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: d18893b2d5dd41332dd51a460882fb282c048ebb.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 361 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2008 Mar 09
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Make the ocaml source comments work with ocamldoc.
This patch cleans up the code so that it formats nicely with
ocamldoc. It does not yet hook into the build system, though.
---
bindings/ocaml/analysis/llvm_analysis.mli | 21 +-
bindings/ocaml/bitreader/llvm_bitreader.mli | 13 +-
bindings/ocaml/bitwriter/llvm_bitwriter.mli | 11 +-
.../ocaml/executionengine/llvm_executionengine.mli | 118 ++--
2008 Mar 17
0
[LLVMdev] OCaml "make install" failure
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The OCaml stuff is failing during the "make install" command:
void committed my fix so hopefully this will now work for you.
2010 Mar 04
4
[LLVMdev] Last chance to get anything into llvm-c and ocaml bindings
I've pretty much finished exposing all I wanted to llvm-c and the
ocaml bindings for the soon to be released 2.7. Does anyone need any
other functions exposed before the code freeze on the 7th?
2008 Mar 04
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Cleanup the c and ocaml binding documentation.
On Mar 4, 2008, at 09:18, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
> Thanks, this looks good. Can you please resubmit this patch, and the
> others, as an attachment?
>
> On Mar 4, 2008, at 03:19, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
>
>> diff --git include/llvm-c/Core.h include/llvm-c/Core.h
>> index 9b11df5..3676377 100644
>> --- include/llvm-c/Core.h
>> +++
2008 Mar 04
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Cleanup the c and ocaml binding documentation.
---
bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm.ml | 2 +-
bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm.mli | 2 +-
bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm_ocaml.c | 2 +-
include/llvm-c/Core.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 316a84e85ed2363551149e65a227c8e7c8192624.diff
Type:
2010 Feb 18
6
[LLVMdev] ocaml survey
I'm in the process of finishing up the ocaml llvm bindings, and I had
some last minute questions before we code freeze:
1. What version of ocaml is everyone using, and how old of an ocaml
version do you need to support?
2. Would it be alright if I renamed some functions? Module providers
are being removed for 2.7. I can keep the old functions around, but
I'd prefer to keep the API clean.
2009 Aug 16
2
[LLVMdev] Is the head of llvm-gcc not working with the head of llvm for anyone else?
I just tried to compile llvm-gcc against the top of llvm and I ran
into this error:
/.../llvm/llvm-gcc-build/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B/.../llvm/llvm-gcc-build/./prev-gcc/
-B/.../llvm/llvm-gcc-install/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -c
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -I.
-I/.../llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2/libiberty/../include -W -Wall -pedantic
-Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wc++-compat
2010 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-OCaml Bindings Tutorial (2.6-2.7)
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
> There are at least two other significant users of LLVM's OCaml bindings,
> AFAIK.
I'm writing an llvm backend/repl for felix, but it's pretty early.
> My only gripe with LLVM's OCaml bindings is the way an error caught on the
> LLVM side causes my program to die in a way that the
2007 Oct 03
2
[LLVMdev] using "ocamlc -where" to find ocaml c headers
I've got ocaml installed in a non-standard location, and while the svn
version of llvm seems to detect my ocaml binaries, it doesn't seem add
"ocamlc -where" to the c include search path. This causes
bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm_ocaml.c to error out unless I run "make
CFLAGS=`ocamlc -where`". Any chance that this could be added?
2009 May 28
0
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] possible OCAML bug on 'make install'
I am getting the following on doing a 'make install' on Cygwin platform :-
llvm[1]: Packaging HTML documentation
llvm[1]: Installing HTML documentation
llvm[1]: Building ocamldoc documentation
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/ang/build/llvm/bindings/ocaml'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `ocamldoc'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory
2010 Mar 01
2
[LLVMdev] Tag number of OCaml Variant in executionengine
Another quick question.
In ./bindings/ocaml/Makefile.ocaml, the configurations when
ENABLE_OPTIMIZED<>1 are commented, which set -g flag to $(OCAMLC).
Is that for back-compatibility to support OCaml < 3.10.0?
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Erick Tryzelaar
<idadesub at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at
2011 Jun 13
2
[LLVMdev] Reading Instructions from Ocaml
Hello,
I'm interested in the OCaml bindings, but I've been digging through them and
it doesn't seem possible to actually write a transformation with them.
Specifically, there are a lot of functions to build each type of
instruction, but there doesn't seem to be any way to query an llvalue and
determine what kind of instruction it is. Is there something that I am
missing?
Thank
2010 Aug 15
4
[LLVMdev] Ocaml bindings in 2.8
Hi,
Does 2.8 release plan to change anything in Ocaml bindings?
http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew does not list any
relevant features.
2.7 added 'operand' that can access each operand from a value.
external operand : llvalue -> int -> llvalue = "llvm_operand"
Does this binding also expose a primitive to return how many operands
a given value has?
I need
2011 Jun 14
0
[LLVMdev] Reading Instructions from Ocaml
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Gregory Malecha <gmalecha at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
Hello Gregory,
> I'm interested in the OCaml bindings, but I've been digging through them and
> it doesn't seem possible to actually write a transformation with them.
> Specifically, there are a lot of functions to build each type of
> instruction, but there doesn't seem
2009 Aug 16
0
[LLVMdev] Is the head of llvm-gcc not working with the head of llvm for anyone else?
On Aug 15, 2009, at 5:05 PM, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
> I just tried to compile llvm-gcc against the top of llvm and I ran
> into this error:
>
> /.../llvm/llvm-gcc-build/./prev-gcc/xgcc
> -B/.../llvm/llvm-gcc-build/./prev-gcc/
> -B/.../llvm/llvm-gcc-install/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -c
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -I.
> -I/.../llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2/libiberty/../include -W
2008 Mar 05
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Prefer to use *.opt ocaml executables as they are more efficient.
Hello Gordon,
This is another attempt to use the .opt ocaml executables. I've attached these instead
of inlining them, so hopefully they won't give you problems applying them. Please let
me know if it's still not working, then I'll just do this the old fashioned way.
- Erick
---
autoconf/configure.ac | 6 ++--
configure | 81
2008 Mar 04
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Cleanup the c and ocaml binding documentation.
Hi Erick,
Thanks, this looks good. Can you please resubmit this patch, and the
others, as an attachment?
On Mar 4, 2008, at 03:19, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
> ---
> bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm.ml | 2 +-
> bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm.mli | 2 +-
> bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm_ocaml.c | 2 +-
> include/llvm-c/Core.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++
> +-------------
2012 Apr 02
2
[LLVMdev] Build Error
I am getting a build error after doing a "make update" and then running
"make clean all":
gmake[4]: *** No rule to make target
`/home/ryan/llvm/llvm_core/trunk/Release+Asserts/lib/ocaml/llvm.cmi',
needed by
`/home/ryan/llvm/llvm_core/trunk/bindings/ocaml/transforms/ipo/Release+Asserts/llvm_ipo.cmi'.
Stop.
gmake[4]: Leaving directory
2010 Feb 19
0
[LLVMdev] ocaml survey
On Feb 18, 2010, at 12:51, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
>
> I'm in the process of finishing up the ocaml llvm bindings, and I had
> some last minute questions before we code freeze:
>
> 1. What version of ocaml is everyone using, and how old of an ocaml
> version do you need to support?
Still using OCaml 3.11.1, but will but upgrading to OCaml 3.11.2 around the same time as the