similar to: [LLVMdev] [PATCH] Make the ocaml source comments work with ocamldoc.

Hi Everyone, When I compile llvm 2.8 with the option --disable-optimized --enable-assertions on Leopard with Ocaml 3.11, I get the following fatal error when it starts to build the ocaml docs. llvm[1]: Installing HTML documentation llvm[1]: Building ocamldoc documentation llvm[3]: Documenting llvm.odoc llvm[3]: Documenting llvm_bitreader.odoc llvm[3]: Documenting llvm_bitwriter.odoc llvm[3]:

Pending positive confirmation in http://llvm.org/PR2886, I'd recommend that r57974 and r57976 be pulled into the 2.4 release branch and configure regenerated there. Begin forwarded message: > From: Gordon Henriksen <gordonhenriksen at mac.com> > Date: October 22, 2008 08:40:40 EDT > To: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: [llvm-commits] [llvm] r57974 -

Getting the following on Cygwin :- Running /home/ang/svn/llvm/test/Bindings/Ocaml/ocaml.exp ... FAIL: /home/ang/svn/llvm/test/Bindings/Ocaml/analysis.ml Failed with exit(2) at line 1 while running: /usr/bin/ocamlc -cc g++ -I /home/ang/build/llvm/Debug/lib/ocaml - warn-error A llvm.cma llvm_analysis.cma /home/ang/svn/llvm/test/Bindings/Ocaml/a nalysis.ml -o analysis.ml.tmp 2> /dev/null child

(cc'ing llvm-dev) Hello Gregory, i just recompiled llvm from scratch, and was able to build the ocaml kaleidoscope bindings. Did you know the llvm's build system already can compile the kaleidoscope tutorials for you? You can run this to build them: make BUILD_EXAMPLES=1 Or just cd into the examples directory in your build directory, and run "make" there. Anyway, I think the

Hi all, I'm interested in the LLVM Ocaml bindings so I pulled the current sources from SVN and built them. When I ran the test suite I got the following stats: # of expected passes 2631 # of unexpected failures 7 # of expected failures 11 It looks like some of the failures were due to the Ocaml parts of the tests: FAIL:

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:32, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+cl at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm interested in the LLVM Ocaml bindings so I pulled the current > sources from SVN and built them. When I ran the test suite I got the > following stats: > > # of expected passes 2631 > # of unexpected failures 7 > # of expected

Hello everyone... I'm hoping that someone can give me insight as to why I am having problems building the Kaleidoscope example for OCaml. Platform: Mac OS 10.8.2 OCaml version: 4.00.1 LLVM version: 3.1 XCode version: 4.5.2 I successfully build the examples when running "gnumake BUILD_EXAMPLES=1" in the OBJ_DIR, however when I try to build them from outside the build tree (ie move

I've run into a problem with the ocaml bindings and the jit. It builds fine without the jit, but when I try to include it it tries to use the c object files from the build location, instead of the install location: > llvm-config --libdir --libfiles engine /opt/local/lib /opt/local/lib/LLVMX86.o /opt/local/lib/libLLVMSelectionDAG.a /opt/local/lib/libLLVMCodeGen.a

Hi all, from llvm-trunk I'm getting this failure: llvm[0]: Running test suite make[1]: Entering directory `/home/rleissa/projects/llvm/build_debug/test' Making a new site.exp file... Making LLVM 'lit.site.cfg' file... Making LLVM unittest 'lit.site.cfg' file... make -C /home/rleissa/projects/llvm/build_debug/test/../tools/clang/test lit.site.cfg Unit/lit.site.cfg

Erick, I see the problem. The llvm-config linker options are baked into the ocaml library, which is good. But for the execution engine, that link line includes the full paths to some .o files. Those paths come from llvm-config, and they vary before and after installation. (Before install, they point into the source tree as you're seeing.) You could theoretically get working

(ccing llvmdev) Hi Ranjit! I only ported Chris's tutorial and Gordon did the vast majority of the bindings, so they deserve most of the praise. I believe there are techniques for walking over the CFG. You can load up code using Llvm_bitreader, use things like Llvm.iter_globals, Llvm.iter_functions, and Llvm.iter_instrs to walk over the module, and write out a new llmodule using

Hi, thanks Chris and Gordon for the fantasic infrastructure and ocaml bindings and Erick for the prompt response! I'm looking to use LLVM to write program analyses for C/C++ programs, but to use Ocaml to write the analyses. I did see there were bindings for iterating over: * functions in a module [iter_functions] * basic blocks in a functions [iter_blocks] * instructions in a block

Jon, LLVM seems to be now dependant by default on OCAML and ocamldoc. Can you please change this so OCAML is only built and enabled when an '--enable-ocaml' flag is set on 'configure'. As I cannot do 'make install' on Cygwin as ocamldoc is not availiable on Cygwin. Also really 95% of LLVM users are not either going to have ocaml installed or are going to be using it.

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Aaron Gray<aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: > Jon, > > LLVM seems to be now dependant by default on OCAML and ocamldoc. Can you > please change this so OCAML is only built and enabled when an > '--enable-ocaml' flag is set on 'configure'. As I cannot do 'make install' > on Cygwin as ocamldoc is not

erick-- I noticed in the OCamldoc entries for [declare_qualified_global] and [define_qualified_global] that you've given the address space parameter the name [as], which is a reserved word in OCaml. The actual code doesn't use this name, which is why it compiles, but the OCamldoc output looks weird. — j h woodyatt <jhw at conjury.org> http://jhw.vox.com/

On Jul 2, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Aaron >> Gray<aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: >>> Jon, >>> >>> LLVM seems to be now dependant by default on OCAML and ocamldoc. >>> Can you >>> please change this so OCAML is only built and enabled when an >>>

> Aaron, I don't have ocaml installed and llvm builds fine for me. Yeah, its only a problem if you have OCaML installed but not ocamldoc. Sorry for the noise, Aaron

Hi LLVM, I was installing LLVM2.6 on a system without ocamldoc. The configure generates OCAMLDOC with value NULL without warnings, so it got errors at 'make install'. But I did not check if 2.7 fixed this problem. -- Jianzhou

On Wednesday 30 September 2015 10:19:10 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Miscellaneous improvements to the ocamldoc: > > - Generate more sub-headings. > > - Document the object-oriented API. > > - Use a common function to generate the doc for module and OO APIs. > --- Mostly OK, except ... > + let generate_doc ?(indent = "") f = > + if is_documented f

Using 'ocamlfind ocamldoc' is much faster than running 'ocamldoc' directly, because ocamlfind will run the native code program 'ocamldoc.opt' if it is available. This change approximately halves the time taken to compile the ocaml bindings. --- ocaml/Makefile.am | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ocaml/Makefile.am b/ocaml/Makefile.am index