similar to: [LLVMdev] Cloning a function

y > On Feb 11, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Scott A. Carr <carr27 at purdue.edu> wrote: > > Hello again, > > I've narrowed down my issue to a small test case. The core of the issue is that CloneFunction (with ModuleLevelChanges=true) on a function that has had other functions inlined into it generates orphan debug info metadata nodes. Then when this module is emitted, DwarfDebug

Hi Medhi, Thanks for you reply. Here is the full output of -print-after-all [1] and just the module itself after my pass[2]. I've looked over the IR, but I can't see anything obviously wrong. I'm not sure what you meant by: > You may want to try to add it at the end of the pipeline My pass is the last one added inside populateLTOPassManager. Should I add it to the

Hi, supposing I have a function “foo” like the following: int foo(int a, int b) { ... ... } I want to insert int the LLVM IR a call instructions to a function “bar” that requires the same parameters of foo. So my function foo will become: int foo(int a, int b) { bar(a,b); … ... } I am using the following code: bool ThreadSanitizer::runOnFunction(Function &F) {

On 14 July 2016 at 20:07, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 14, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Pierre Gagelin via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am trying to use the CloneFunction from llvm/Transforms/Utils/Cloning.h > and I don't understand how the ValueToValueMapTy argument should be > initialized. For instance,

Hi, I am trying to use the CloneFunction from llvm/Transforms/Utils/Cloning.h and I don't understand how the ValueToValueMapTy argument should be initialized. For instance, let say I want to clone this function (to add an argument): define void @function(i32 %i) #0 { entry: %i.addr = alloca i32, align 4 store i32 %i, i32* %i.addr, align 4 ret void } to another function which should,

Hi, I want to duplicate a function and transfer it from one module to another. I found "CloneFunction()" but it needs an "vMap". I found that "vMap" is used to map the original values to the new values. So, hypothetically, if the original function uses a global variable from the previous module and I want that use in the new function to be mapped to a global variable

In the following example with gcc style builtins, in once case llvm.powi.f64 is emitted and in the other just a call to library function powf. ~/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/bin/clang -S -emit-llvm pow1.c Why is that? Is there a way to force the call to an llvm style builtin? Tia. Reed -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pow1.c Type: text/x-csrc

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:56 AM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > I seem to recall havbing asked this before but I can't find it by searching. > > What's the right way to clone a Function? I need to save off the text at a > certain point and spit it out later, after other optimizations have run. But > I need to spit out the original text, not the optimized

On Wednesday 09 July 2008 12:16, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:56 AM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > > I seem to recall havbing asked this before but I can't find it by > > searching. > > > > What's the right way to clone a Function? I need to save off the text at > > a certain point and spit it out later, after other

> On Jan 12, 2017, at 12:58 PM, Friedman, Eli via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 1/12/2017 9:33 AM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev wrote: >>> On Jan 12, 2017, at 5:03 AM, Antoine Pitrou via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 11:43:17 -0600 >>> Wei Ding via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at

> On Jan 12, 2017, at 2:21 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Jan 12, 2017, at 11:04 AM, Steve (Numerics) Canon <scanon at apple.com <mailto:scanon at apple.com>> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jan 12, 2017, at 12:58 PM, Friedman, Eli via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>

> On 2014-Dec-18, at 01:43, Keno Fischer <kfischer at college.harvard.edu> wrote: > > Hi Duncan, > > I'm in the following situation for which this change caused an assertion failure: > > Three modules, let's say A B C > Two function, F in A, G in B > > Now I CloneFunction F into B (call the new function F') and inline F' into G. > Now,

Hi, It looks like SimplifyLibCalls has a tendency to emit calls to libm functions without checking with TLI whether these calls are available. For example, PowOpt has this code: struct PowOpt : public UnsafeFPLibCallOptimization { PowOpt(bool UnsafeFPShrink) : UnsafeFPLibCallOptimization(UnsafeFPShrink) {} virtual Value *callOptimizer(Function *Callee, CallInst *CI, IRBuilder<> &B)

In general I use DebugInfoFinder and clear out Metadata if GV in null or GV->isDeclaration(). If there is any interest, I can post that patch... Sergei --- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation > -----Original Message----- > From: Tobias Edler von Koch [mailto:tobias at codeaurora.org] > Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016

Hello, I'm writing an LTO pass and I'd like to be able to duplicate a function (with debugging info). I'm trying to accomplish this with CloneFunction but it's leading to a seg fault in ld. I've whittled down my problem so that it occurs in this small pass [1]. If I run this pass with opt, I get the expected result (i.e. a valid program that calls main twice). If I run

Hi, I wonder what is the right way to target an old glibc? I have a machine which is up to date (glibc 2.32 and clang+lld 10.0.1). So far I've been able to target older glibc by having a C file containing: __asm__(".symver powf,powf at GLIBC_2.2.5"); __asm__(".symver expf,expf at GLIBC_2.2.5"); __asm__(".symver exp2f,exp2f at GLIBC_2.2.5");

Hi all, I have been experimenting with getting LLVM to build with MSVC8 express. I have succeeded in getting trunk to build and run the Fibonacci example in release mode. I have found various minor problems with the build system. First, it appears not to be able to run the configure subproject commands if there is a space in the directory path. Secondly, it fails to build different subprojects

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Kuperstein, Michael M < michael.m.kuperstein at intel.com> wrote: > Hi,**** > > ** ** > > It looks like SimplifyLibCalls has a tendency to emit calls to libm > functions without checking with TLI whether these calls are available.**** > > For example, PowOpt has this code:**** > > ** ** > > struct PowOpt : public

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:01 PM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote: > > How to find what is pulling libmvec? > > If you build a -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug lld, you can set a breakpoint > on lld/ELF/MarkLive.cpp:114 (ss->getFile().isNeeded) and check which > symbol makes > libmvec.so needed. I'm afraid this is going to far for me :) > > On the other

On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 17:30 -0700, Hisham Chowdhury wrote: > > > > - Is there a utility to clone a MachineBasicBlock in LLVM > > > > > > There is CloneBasicBlock routine in ./lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp - Sanjiv > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu