similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-2.2 cannot be successfully built with 'make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1'

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] llvm-2.2 cannot be successfully built with 'make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1'"

2008 Feb 20
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-2.2 cannot be successfully built with 'make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1'
Hi, > But when I use 'make ENABLE_OPTMIZED=1', the compilation fails with the spelling mistake: should be ENABLE_OPTIMIZED not ENABLE_OPTMIZED. > message: > > /home/wuxi/llvm-2.2/llvm-objects-opt/Release/bin/tblgen: > /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by > /home/wuxi/llvm-2.2/llvm-objects-opt/Release/bin/tblgen) The
2008 Feb 20
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-2.2 cannot be successfully built with 'make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1'
Hello, Andrew, > I have checked by libstdc++, with a higher version: > > [wuxi at ppidellsc1420 lib]$ rpm -q libstdc++ > > libstdc++-4.1.1-52.el5 It is lower version. You should use newer version (the one, you've built during gcc 4.2.3 compilation) for the binaries built with new compiler. There are two solutions: 1. Build new gcc with --disable-shared, which will
2012 Feb 23
6
Please I'd like to install 2 websites on my un managed VPS on CentOS6
Hello I've got an un managed VPS running CentOS6 I'd like to install 2 websites and secure the whole VPS I've tried tutorials from the how to forge website but things keep screwing all the time. Please if any one can help or give a good working tutorials that would be awesome. Thanks a lot WI,
2010 Aug 08
1
[LLVMdev] What is the gcc optimization flag for "ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1" in LLVM?
Dear LLVM developers, I am wondering the gcc optimization flag for "ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1" in LLVM is -O2 or -O3. And what is the flag if I set "ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0"? If I want to manually modify the flag for "ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1" in LLVM, what file should I refer to? -- Regards, Heming Cui -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
2012 Mar 14
1
[LLVMdev] ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1
When building without ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1, is that supposed to take 10 times longer to "build" LLVM than with ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1? Thanks. Reed
2010 Sep 24
2
[LLVMdev] libstdc++.so.6 problem
Hi all, I am really stumped on this problem. I googled and could not find any solution. Here is the problem. I compiled and installed glibc-2.5-20090518 in a local directory with gcc version 4.1.2. I compiled glibc-2.5 because I wanted to test glibc-2.5 on gcc first llvm-gcc. However, after I installed glibc, llvm-gcc does not work any more. It reported this error message:
2010 Mar 18
2
[LLVMdev] Help with building LLVM 2.6 GCC
Hi Aaron, Duncan Thanks for the answers. >From Duncan's e-mail, I've tried to build llvm-2.6. First problem was a missing dependence on lbffi.so.4. But I've downloaded the source from redhat, compiled and passed that point. Now I have another missing dependence on GLIBCXX_3.4.9. The version in my system is 3.4.6-11. I've been looking around for a 3.4.9 rpm for redhat, could
2007 Mar 24
3
[LLVMdev] Compilation problems
Hi, I try to compile LLVM and the GCC frontend for LLVM. The steps that I follow are first to compile LLVM and later to compile GCC front end. I tried to compile LLVM 1.8, 1.9 releases and the CVS versions. I tried to compile with different GCC compilers 3.4.0, 4.1.2 and 4.2.0 GCC compilers 3.4.0 and 4.2.0 fail compiling LLVM sources. GCC 4.1.2 works. I cannot compile GCC front end. When I
2010 Mar 18
0
[LLVMdev] Help with building LLVM 2.6 GCC
Hi Eliseu, > Now I have another missing dependence on GLIBCXX_3.4.9. The version in > my system is 3.4.6-11. how does this missing dependence manifest itself? Ciao, Duncan.
2010 Jun 06
2
[LLVMdev] Error while compiling mysql using LLVM-gold
The errors are /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found I can not use it in the command line... Rafael Espindola wrote: >> However, I got >> "... >> checking for gcc... llvm-gcc -use-gold-plugin >> checking for C compiler default output file name... >> ... >> configure: error: C
2010 Sep 24
1
[LLVMdev] GLIBCXX_3.4.9 not found
Hi all, I am really stumped on this problem. I googled and could not find any solution. Here is the problem. I compiled and installed glibc-2.5-20090518 in a local directory with gcc version 4.1.2. I compiled glibc-2.5 because I wanted to test glibc-2.5 on gcc first llvm-gcc. However, after I installed glibc, llvm-gcc does not work any more. It reported this error message:
2012 Feb 23
4
How to setup a computer using CentOS6 as a firewall for the whole network in my place?
Hello in one of the emails I sent earlier ; mark (m.roth at 5-cent.us) mentioned: > install linux on a computer with two ethernet cards. connect eth0 to > your internet connection, and eth1 to your local network. configure > iptables firewall rules in the linux system. or install pfsense on that > same computer. Please if any one can help with more details and
2009 Jul 20
1
Glibcxx_3.4.9 not found
Hi, I am running CentOS 5.3. 64 bit version. I have tried updating the OS but every time I run an application I need it reports that Glibcxx_3.4.9 is missing. I tried to do a search for this but cannot find it for my system. When CentOS upgraded to 5.3 I had hoped that the new Glibcxx would have been included but it is not. Is there an easy way to update the OS to include this? You can
2009 May 01
2
[LLVMdev] Using non-system compiler to build llvm and llvm-gcc front end
I am attempting to install llvm on CentOS 5.3, which uses gcc-4.1.2 as its system compiler. Since this compiler has reported to behave poorly with llvm, I built gcc-4.2.4 in an insulated directory for use with my llvm installation. However, I am not sure I am configuring properly. The gcc-4.2.4 installation is in /pkg/bin/gcc-4.2.4. Here is my config line: ../llvm-2.5/configure
2009 May 02
0
[LLVMdev] Using non-system compiler to build llvm and llvm-gcc front end
Ah, nevermind... just needed to make clean to clear out some of the junk I compiled with gcc-4.1.2. The build completed without error. On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Scott Ricketts <sricketts at maxentric.com>wrote: > I am attempting to install llvm on CentOS 5.3, which uses gcc-4.1.2 as its > system compiler. Since this compiler has reported to behave poorly with > llvm, I built
2008 Dec 10
2
VTd not showing PCI device in VM
I''m having trouble actually seeing a PCI device in my VMs. I''ve resolved several of my issues using previous posts and using the VTdHowTo wiki page. I have both VT and VTd BIOS options enabled. I have pciback hiding the devices and xm can list and assign the devices to VMs. I don''t see the PCI devices in my VMs though. I have tried a windows and a Linux vm, without
2010 Sep 27
1
[LLVMdev] glibc compilation
Hi All, Did anyone try to compile glibc with llvm-gcc or clang? I tried to configure glibc with CC=llvm-gcc and it failed with this message: ... checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin//install -c checking whether ln -s works... yes checking for gcc... llvm-gcc checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile See
2010 Jun 06
1
[LLVMdev] Error while compiling mysql using LLVM-gold
Some things to check: Run llvm-gcc a.c -emit-llvm -use-gold-plugin -Wl,debug This will print the link command line. What is it? Do you get the same error messages if you run just that? Are gold and the plugin linked with the same libstdc++? Cheers On Jun 5, 2010 11:50 PM, "Guoliang Jin" <jingl1345 at gmail.com> wrote: The errors are /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version
2009 Oct 18
1
installing working skype possible???
I easily installed and used skype on my previous linux distro on this same machine, but am having problems getting it to work on my relatively new centos 5.3. I downloaded three versions of skype from their website: the two fedora rpms wouldn't install, their error messages complaining that it needed another package, a package which was already installed. (I figured it had to be looking for
2009 May 04
3
[LLVMdev] Using non-system compiler to build llvm and llvm-gcc front end
I am still having problems getting everything installed. I realized that the successful build of llvm-2.5 had in fact been configured to use the system gcc (4.1.2). However, I was unable to sucessfully build llvm-gcc with gcc 4.1.2. I went back and attempted to build llvm-2.5 with gcc-4.2.4 (installed in a separate directory from system gcc). However, I got the same build error as before. Then I