similar to: [LLVMdev] Some questions about live intervals

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Some questions about live intervals"

2008 Feb 01
0
[LLVMdev] Some questions about live intervals
On Jan 31, 2008, at 5:05 AM, Roman Levenstein wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to sketch an LLVM-based implementation of the Extended > Linear Scan algorithm, described in this Vivek Sarkar's paper: > http://www.cs.rice.edu/~vs3/PDF/cc2007.pdf > Sarkar reports that this version of Linear Scan produces better code > than graph-coloring regallocs and is also much faster (15x
2008 Feb 08
2
[LLVMdev] Some questions about live intervals
Hi Evan, Here is a patch for the LiveIntervalAnalysis that we discussed. --- Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> schrieb: > > 1) What is the easiest way to understand which MBB a given > instruction index belongs to? All the required information is > available in the > > MBB2IdxMap of the LiveIntervalAnalysis class. Would it be useful > to add a small function
2008 Feb 11
0
[LLVMdev] Some questions about live intervals
Thanks. One question though. Should getMBBFromIndex() assert if given an index out of the range or simply returns a NULL pointer? I would think the later makes it a bit more friendly. Evan On Feb 8, 2008, at 8:59 AM, Roman Levenstein wrote: > Hi Evan, > > Here is a patch for the LiveIntervalAnalysis that we discussed. > > --- Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com>
2008 Feb 11
2
[LLVMdev] Some questions about live intervals
Hi Evan, --- Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > Thanks. One question though. Should getMBBFromIndex() assert if given > an index out of the range or simply returns a NULL pointer? I would > think the later makes it a bit more friendly. Yes. It would be more friendly, probably. I can submit such a patch, if you think it suits better. On the other hand I want to
2008 Jan 31
0
[LLVMdev] Some questions about live intervals
Hi Roman, > I already started work on the implementation of this algorithm and have > a few hopefully rather simple questions: > > 1) What is the easiest way to understand which MBB a given instruction > index belongs to? All the required information is available in the > MBB2IdxMap of the LiveIntervalAnalysis class. Would it be useful to add > a small function
2008 Apr 16
3
[LLVMdev] Possible bug in LiveIntervalAnalysis?
Hi, In the LiveIntervalAnalysis::runOnMachineFunction, there is a code to compute the MBB2IdxMap, by remembering for each MBB its start and end instruction numbers: unsigned MIIndex = 0; for (MachineFunction::iterator MBB = mf_->begin(), E = mf_->end(); MBB != E; ++MBB) { unsigned StartIdx = MIIndex; for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = MBB->begin(), E =
2008 Apr 16
0
[LLVMdev] Possible bug in LiveIntervalAnalysis?
Hi I'm seeing something probably related to this. I'm getting an assert from the lower_bound in LiveIntervals::findLiveinMBBs (from a checking std:: VS2005 implementation). Idx2MBBMap has two elements in it, both of which have a .first of 0. (I believe because of an empty MBB in the function below, so StartIndex doesn't advance). scott On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Roman
2008 Apr 18
1
[LLVMdev] Possible bug in LiveIntervalAnalysis?
Can you file a bug so I don't forget? I'm a little occupied right now. But I'll take care of this soon. Evan On Apr 16, 2008, at 10:52 AM, Scott Graham wrote: > Hi > > I'm seeing something probably related to this. I'm getting an assert > from the lower_bound in LiveIntervals::findLiveinMBBs (from a checking > std:: VS2005 implementation). Idx2MBBMap has two
2008 Apr 02
5
[LLVMdev] Goog test-cases for a new register allocator
Hi, As I mentioned some time ago on the mailing list, I'm working on the implementation of the Sarkar's Extended Linear Scan algorithm for LLVM. For testing and debugging of this algorithm, I need some good test-cases that check different functionalities of the register allocator, e.g.: - test-cases involving a lot of spilling - test-cases using pre-colored registers, e.g. like the EAX
2008 Feb 12
0
[LLVMdev] Some questions about live intervals
On Feb 10, 2008, at 11:44 PM, Roman Levenstein wrote: > Hi Evan, > > --- Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > >> Thanks. One question though. Should getMBBFromIndex() assert if given >> an index out of the range or simply returns a NULL pointer? I would >> think the later makes it a bit more friendly. > > Yes. It would be more friendly, probably.
2008 Jan 31
0
[LLVMdev] Some questions about live intervals
On Thursday 31 January 2008 07:05, Roman Levenstein wrote: > I already started work on the implementation of this algorithm and have > a few hopefully rather simple questions: Roman, I'm excited to hear that you are working on this algorithm. Do you plan to contribute it to the public llvm repository? -Dave
2008 Apr 23
1
[LLVMdev] FoldingSetNodeID operations inefficiency
Hi, While profiling LLVM using my test-cases with huge MBBs, I noticed that FoldingSetNodeID operations (ComputeHash,insertion,etc) may become really inefficient for the nodes, which have very many operands. I can give you an example of what is meant by "very many". In my test-case (you can fetch it from here http://llvm.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=1275), which is just one HUGE MBB
2008 Apr 02
0
[LLVMdev] Goog test-cases for a new register allocator
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 03:06, Roman Levenstein wrote: > Hi, > > As I mentioned some time ago on the mailing list, I'm working on the > implementation of the Sarkar's Extended Linear Scan algorithm for LLVM. Cool! > For testing and debugging of this algorithm, I need some good > test-cases that check different functionalities of the register > allocator, e.g.:
2008 Mar 05
1
rrp.impute: for what sizes does it work?
Hi, I have a survey dataset of about 20000 observations where for 2 factor variables I have about 200 missing values each. I want to impute these using 10 possibly explanatory variables which are a mixture of integers and factors. Since I was quite intrigued by the concept of rrp I wanted to use it but it takes ages and terminates with an error. First time it stopped complaining about too little
2008 Jan 31
2
[LLVMdev] Some questions about live intervals
Hi David, --- David Greene <dag at cray.com> schrieb: > On Thursday 31 January 2008 07:05, Roman Levenstein wrote: > > > I already started work on the implementation of this algorithm and > have > > a few hopefully rather simple questions: > > Roman, > > I'm excited to hear that you are working on this algorithm. Do you > plan to contribute it
2015 Sep 03
2
LiveInterval and Loop Info
Hello to all LLVM Developers. Given a object from a LiveInterval class, is there any way to know if this Live Interval is part or is inside a loop? Att -- Natanael Ramos Membro do corpo discente de Ciência da Computação pelo Instituto Federal de Minas Gerais - Campus Formiga -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2015 Sep 04
2
LiveInterval and Loop Info
Thanks Matthias I can also use the method intervalIsInOneMBB() from LiveIntervals class to relate a LiveInterval to a MachineBasicBlock, right? Em 04/09/2015 2:26 PM, "Matthias Braun" <mbraun at apple.com> escreveu: > There is no direct support for this, but you can use > LiveIntervalAnalysis::getMBBStartIndex()/getMBBEndIndex()/getMBBFromIndex() > to relate the
2008 Jan 23
2
[LLVMdev] LiveInterval Splitting & SubRegisters
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 02:01, Evan Cheng wrote: > On Jan 22, 2008, at 12:23 PM, David Greene wrote: > > Evan, > > > > Can you explain the basic mechanics of the live interval splitting > > code? > > Is it all in LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp under addIntervalsForSpills > > and child > > routines? What is it trying to do? > > It's splitting
2008 Apr 02
4
[LLVMdev] Comparison mismatch causes assert using VStudio STL
Hola LLVMers, We saw a problem with some code in LiveIntervalAnalysis.h/.c which we've fixed locally. We'd like to get a patch to the mainline and want to know how you'd like it fixed. A couple of things come together to cause the problem: struct Idx2MBBCompare { bool operator()(const IdxMBBPair &LHS, const IdxMBBPair &RHS) const { return LHS.first <
2008 Jan 25
0
[LLVMdev] LiveInterval Splitting & SubRegisters
On Jan 23, 2008, at 2:40 PM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 23 January 2008 02:01, Evan Cheng wrote: >> On Jan 22, 2008, at 12:23 PM, David Greene wrote: >>> Evan, >>> >>> Can you explain the basic mechanics of the live interval splitting >>> code? >>> Is it all in LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp under