similar to: [LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2"

2008 Feb 06
6
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
On Feb 6, 2008, at 5:18 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi, > >> if /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile /s/llvm/obj.gcc42/./gcc/xgcc -B/ >> s/llvm/obj.gcc42/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/ >> local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/ >> include -isystem /usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include - >> DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
2008 Feb 06
0
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
On 2/6/08, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Feb 6, 2008, at 5:18 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > > > Hi, > > > >> if /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile /s/llvm/obj.gcc42/./gcc/xgcc -B/ > >> s/llvm/obj.gcc42/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/ > >> local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/ >
2008 Feb 06
0
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
Hi, > if /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile /s/llvm/obj.gcc42/./gcc/xgcc -B/s/llvm/obj.gcc42/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/s/llvm/svn.gcc42/libgomp -I. -I/s/llvm/svn.gcc42/libgomp/config/linux/x86
2008 Feb 06
2
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
> > Bill's change only affected darwin IIRC. I don't know that anyone has > > built GOMP on linux yet, and OpenMP hasn't been widely tested at all. > > I'd suggest using --enable-languages=c,c++ > > I am seeing the same errors with just building c,c++. (linux x86, also debian) This bit of Bill's patch did it: -#ifdef HAVE_GAS_HIDDEN + +#if
2008 Feb 06
2
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
I'm on Debian Etch and re-compile llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 from scratch. I'm on svn revision 46813. I'm using the following commands for the compilation: ---------------------------------- # Get the sources mkdir /s/llvm cd /s/llvm svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk /s/llvm/svn.llvm svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk /s/llvm/svn.gcc42 # Compile llvm
2008 Feb 06
2
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
> > > I suspect this is due to the recent change by Bill (revision 46747). > > > > Bill's change only affected darwin IIRC. I don't know that anyone has > > built GOMP on linux yet, and OpenMP hasn't been widely tested at all. > > I'd suggest using --enable-languages=c,c++ > > I am seeing the same errors with just building c,c++. (linux x86,
2011 Sep 08
4
[LLVMdev] multi-threading in llvm
Hi, I want to execute the iterations of a loop in parallel, by inserting calls either to pthreads or to the gomp library at the LLVM IR level. As a first step, I inserted an omp pragma in a C file and compiled it with llvm-gcc to check the generated LLVM code. If I understand correctly, to parallelize the loop in LLVM IR, I have to separate the loop in a new function, put all required parameters
2011 Sep 12
0
[LLVMdev] multi-threading in llvm
Hi Alexandra, I don't know much, maybe this topic should be bridged with polly-dev (adding it to CC) to bring it more attention. Indeed, polly uses ScopPass, that creates serious limitations in compatibility with other passes. To my understanding, scops are used because ISL loop analysis tool uses scops. In fact, just for handling OpenMP directives scops are not required, unless one need to
2008 Feb 06
0
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
>> >> I suspect this is due to the recent change by Bill (revision 46747). > > Bill's change only affected darwin IIRC. I don't know that anyone has > built GOMP on linux yet, and OpenMP hasn't been widely tested at all. > I'd suggest using --enable-languages=c,c++ This looks like something is broken on the gcc side of things. Does a simple: void
2008 Feb 06
0
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>>> I suspect this is due to the recent change by Bill (revision >>>> 46747). >>> >>> Bill's change only affected darwin IIRC. I don't know that anyone >>> has >>> built GOMP on linux yet, and OpenMP hasn't been widely tested at >>> all. >>> I'd
2010 Nov 19
1
gomp library with Rtools212
Dear developers, I am a maintainer of the CORElearn package which uses OpenMP multithreading to speed up some computations. When producing a new release we tested the package with the latest R 2.12.0. On Linux the package works normally. On Windows we installed a recommended version of Rtools (Rtools212) but the linker fails with the messages below. ... g++
2008 Feb 06
1
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
On 2/6/08, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > >> > >> I suspect this is due to the recent change by Bill (revision 46747). > > > > Bill's change only affected darwin IIRC. I don't know that anyone has > > built GOMP on linux yet, and OpenMP hasn't been widely tested at all. > > I'd suggest using
2005 Aug 03
1
passing variable to formula environment
List gurus, I'm trying to code a Gompertz growth curve function as part of a larger project and have run across a problem due to my ignorance of environments. Some sample data and the function are as follows: growth <- data.frame(age = c(1.92, 3, 5.83, 3.17, 15.5, 1.17, 5.58, 13.33, 14.29, 5.83, 13.79, 6.33, 13.75, 16.83, 13, 11.67, 0.25, 1.73, 9.46, 5.67), length = c(157, 165, 179,
2010 Oct 02
2
[LLVMdev] DragonEgg OpenMP support
Hi, I would like to ask which version of OpenMP is supported by DragonEgg and at which extent(i.e. fully, partially etc.).
2007 Aug 04
2
multiple nls - next fit even after convergence problem
Hello R-gurus, I'm trying to adjust different growth curves to a rather extensive dataset. I wrote up a function to go through all of them, but am encountering a problem : among the more than 1000 curves I have, obviously for some of them I encounter conversion problems. I'd like for my function to keep going to the next curve and store the fact that for curve number X I had a convergence
2011 Jan 06
1
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM-GCC on Linux/PowerPC failed
Hello >  The "--disable-bootstrap" give me no luck. Why you think that > "--disable-bootstrap" might help? Due to reasons I outlined in my prev. e-mail. Now you can notice that the build proceed much further. Try to add --disable-libmudflap as well. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2011 Mar 22
2
[LLVMdev] Parallelization
Hi Duncan Sands, As I have understood, GOMP and OpenMP provides support for parallelizing program at source program level. But I am at the IR level. That is I am trying to parallelize the IR code. This is the case of automatic parallelization. The programmer writing the code does not have any idea of parallelization going behind the hood. So my question is instead of support at the source
2011 Mar 22
0
[LLVMdev] Parallelization
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Gokul Ramaswamy <gokulhcramaswamy at gmail.com > wrote: > Hi Duncan Sands, > > As I have understood, GOMP and OpenMP provides support for > parallelizing program at source program level. But I am at the IR level. > That is I am trying to parallelize the IR code. This is the case of > automatic parallelization. The programmer writing the
2011 Jan 07
0
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM-GCC on Linux/PowerPC failed
Hi, Anton Finally, I built LLVM-GCC 2.8 on a Linux/PS3 machine. I just put my configuration options here, --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ../llvm-gcc-4.2-2.8.source/configure -prefix=/tmp/chenwj/install --disable-bootstrap --disable-libmudflap --disable-multilib --disable-libgomp --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/tmp/chenwj/install
2011 Mar 22
2
[LLVMdev] Parallelization
On 03/22/2011 01:56 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Gokul Ramaswamy > <gokulhcramaswamy at gmail.com <mailto:gokulhcramaswamy at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi Duncan Sands, > > As I have understood, GOMP and OpenMP provides support for > parallelizing program at source program level. But I am at the IR > level. That