Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] llvm useability?"
2008 Jan 22
1
[LLVMdev] llvm useability?
What about ARM target ? I mean iPhone/iPod Touch has an ARM11 with a FPE
and a VFPE. Does llvm-gcc 2.2 generates better code for them ?
I'm a bit disappointed about the llvm-gcc 2.0 I tried for my iPod Touch
as I saw it generated ARM code not very optimically : r7(apparently used
like a frame pointer even when -fomit-frame-pointer is given) largely
overused, generated code like "mov
2007 May 25
3
[LLVMdev] Problems compiling llvm-gcc4 frontend on x86_64
Hi all,
I've run into problems compiling the llvm-gcc frontend on x86_64. Is this
not supported, or am I making an error somewhere?
The procedure I followed was:
1. Download LLVM 2.0 source as a tarball (from a few days ago, during
the testing phase).
2. Download the llvm-gcc4 source today, as a tarball.
3. Extract both.
4. Configure LLVM as: ../src/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install
2007 May 26
0
[LLVMdev] Problems compiling llvm-gcc4 frontend on x86_64
Hi Warren,
You have the -m32 flag set, but it's still giving you this:
> Warning: Generation of 64-bit code for a 32-bit processor requested.
> Warning: 64-bit processors all have at least SSE2.
But are you sure you want to compile the LLVM-GCC source? You should
use the binaries unless absolutely necessary.
-bw
On May 24, 2007, at 10:34 PM, Warren Armstrong wrote:
> Hi all,
2007 May 26
1
[LLVMdev] Problems compiling llvm-gcc4 frontend on x86_64
Hi Warren,
you can try to configure with the following
export CFLAGS="-m64"
export LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib64"
LLVM:
../src/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install --enable-optimized --enable-jit
--enable-targets=host-only
make
LLVM-GCC:
../llvm-gcc4-2.0.source/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install
--program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/warren/llvm/obj/
--enable-languages=c,c++
2007 May 18
2
[LLVMdev] 2.0 Pre-release tarballs online
> On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:23:32AM -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>> 4) Compile llvm-gcc4 and llvm from source. Run 'make check' and do a 'make
>> ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 TEST=nightly report' in llvm-test.
>>
>> It would also be helpful for someone to compile/test with objdir != srcdir.
>
> This is on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, on i386.
> Both llvm and
2007 May 15
8
[LLVMdev] 2.0 Pre-release tarballs online
I've uploaded the 2.0 pre-release to this location:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.0/
If you have free time and would like to help test this release, please
download the appropriate tarballs from the website.
Here are a few ways you can help test this release:
1) Download llvm-gcc4 binary and llvm. Compile and run make check.
2) Download llvm-gcc4 binary, llvm, and llvm-test. Compile, run
2007 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.0 Pre-release tarballs online
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:23:32AM -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
> 4) Compile llvm-gcc4 and llvm from source. Run 'make check' and do a 'make
> ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 TEST=nightly report' in llvm-test.
>
> It would also be helpful for someone to compile/test with objdir != srcdir.
This is on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, on i386.
Both llvm and llvm-gcc were compiled with objdir
2006 Nov 06
0
[LLVMdev] Problems building cfrontend 4 source on SUSE 10.1
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=us-ascii" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<b>Reid,<br>
<br>
I followed the steps but got stuck as described
2006 Nov 06
0
[LLVMdev] Problems building cfrontend 4 source on SUSE 10.1
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Reid,<br>
<br>
Here's the backtrace you asked for:<br>
<br>
2006 Dec 03
3
[LLVMdev] problem building gcc4 front end on fedora core 5
I'm getting a build error when trying to build gcc4 from sources. This is
for the recent 1.9 release.
How I built llvm-1.9:
-----------------------------
tar zxf llvm-1.9.tar.gz
cd llvm-1.9/
./configure --prefix=/custom/llvm-1.9
make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 OPTIMIZE_OPTION='-O2' tools-only
make install
How I built gcc4:
-----------------------------
export
2007 Feb 28
1
[LLVMdev] Cygwin release build error
I did not realize that '--enable-llvm' was required and that invalidates my debug build results which were built just with LLVM on the path.
I am now getting a segmentation fault when doing a 'make install' on LLVM-GCC4, possibly validating my original thoughts that GCC 4.1.1 was required to build LLVM-GCC 4.0.1. I will try using GCC 4.1.1.
Heres the error anyway :-
make[2]:
2006 Nov 06
2
[LLVMdev] Problems building cfrontend 4 source on SUSE 10.1
Hi Robert,
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 12:45 -0800, Robert Mykland wrote:
> Reid,
>
> Here's the backtrace you asked for:
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x0862d65c in llvm::LiveVariables::runOnMachineFunction ()
Hmm, this is a little strange. Your LLVM build is non-debug (there's no
line numbers or arguments in any of the llvm related calls). However,
your llvm-gcc build seems to have
2006 Nov 06
4
[LLVMdev] Problems building cfrontend 4 source on SUSE 10.1
This is an libpath problem. When xgcc runs it wants to dynamically link
the libgcc.so. When you run it from the command line it will find your
system libgcc.so (which works) and so you don't see the segfault. When
you run xgcc from the Makefile, it will have set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to get
your <cfebuilddir>/gcc directory which will find the libgcc.so that it
just built, which is the one
2007 Apr 01
3
[LLVMdev] trouble compiling llvm-gcc4 1.9
I'm having some trouble getting llvm-gcc4 to compile. It's unable to
compile darwin-crt3.c. It's mentioning "Complex expression. Absolute
segment assumed." but I'm not sure if that's a real error message. Has
anyone run into this before? I'm running on a G4 apple 10.4.8, kernel
version 8.6.0. I googled around and found a bug with the same error message:
2006 Nov 14
2
[LLVMdev] gcc 4 frontend binary for mac os x x86
Hi,
On Nov 13, 2006, at 9:17 PM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
> I assume you have an Mac with an Intel processor.
Yes. Sorry, I forgot to mentioned it in the mailbody.
> Download this:
> http://llvm.org/releases/1.8/llvm-gcc4-1.8-x86-darwin.tar.gz
I think that is the same tarball I used before.
> Let me know if that doesn't work.
Again: there is no fixheader-script like you
2013 Jun 25
6
Heterogeneous XCP 1.6 pool
Hi,
I''ve been trying to use E5520 and X5650 together in an heterogeneous pool without success.
I know the combination is not on the official XenServer supported list (http://hcl.xensource.com/CPUPoolsList.aspx), but I thought it would be possible to set the mask anyway and see for myself if the combination works…
My problem is that the mask doesn''t "stick" after a
2006 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] gcc 4 frontend binary for mac os x x86
>> I assume you have an Mac with an Intel processor.
>
> Yes. Sorry, I forgot to mentioned it in the mailbody.
>
>> Download this:
>> http://llvm.org/releases/1.8/llvm-gcc4-1.8-x86-darwin.tar.gz
>
> I think that is the same tarball I used before.
Ok. I'm confused. Do you want llvm-gcc3 or llvm-gcc4? The tarball above is
a binary for llvm-gcc4 for Mac x86. You
2007 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] building llvm-gcc4 with a different target name
Hello,
I've put together a macports version of llvm and llvm-gcc4, but I've run
into a problem with how gcc on the mac works. llvm-gcc4 creates an
executable named:
/opt/local/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.1
Which happens to be the same executable in /usr/bin. Because I have
/opt/local before /usr/bin, gcc ends up using llvm-gcc4 to build all my
code. Most of the time this
2005 Oct 21
2
Yum update crashed, now I have lots of missing deps
During yum update my box crashed (I frequently have this on Centos 4
x86_64 boxes)
---> Package kdebase.x86_64 6:3.3.1-5.8 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: system-config-printer = 0.6.116-1.centos4.1 for
package: system-config-printer-gui
--> Processing Dependency: glibc-devel = 2.3.4-2.9 for package: nptl-devel
--> Processing Dependency:
2006 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>> * I don't think this is ready for release. In particular the llvm-gcc4
>> binary
>> seg faults on FC 5 for most of llvm-test programs.
>> * I'm going to re-try without using the binaries and building
>> everything from scratch.
>
> Does llvm-gcc4 seg fault for make check? I've done extensive