similar to: [LLVMdev] 2.2 Release Delayed

LLVMers, The LLVM 2.1 release branches have been created! Over the next 2 days, I will be generating the pre-release tar balls. I will send out mail once I am done and then the community pre-release testing will begin. I'll also be sending out detailed instructions and the release schedule. Full svn access is restored. Thanks for your patience! Thanks, Tanya Lattner

Hi Tanya, Thanks for creating the branch! What's the procedure for getting a patch into it? There might be one that I need to get in this week... Thanks! -bw On Sep 12, 2007, at 9:52 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > LLVMers, > > The LLVM 2.1 release branches have been created! Over the next 2 > days, I will be generating the pre-release tar balls. I will send out > mail once I

LLVMers, The LLVM 2.2 release branches have been created! Over the next 2 days, I will be generating the pre-release tar balls. I will send out mail once I am done and then the community pre-release testing will begin. I'll also be sending out detailed instructions and the release schedule. As a reminder, please do not commit patches to the release branch. Please email me with a

Dear Tanya: > You also have a few CBE failures that I am not seeing. What version > of xcode do you have installed? Xcode 2.4.1 > Can you send me the following files? > SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/2008-01-07-LongDouble.* > SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/PR1386.* OK, I attached those files (llvm-2.2-test-output.tar.gz) Best regards, 2008/1/30, Tanya Lattner <tonic at

My test results for the LLVM 2.2 prerelease. === Q. Target === * Mac OS X 10.4.11 * 2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo * MacBook % uname -a Darwin macbook.local 8.11.1 Darwin Kernel Version 8.11.1: Wed Oct 10 18:23:28 PDT 2007; root:xnu-792.25.20~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 i386 === Q. How you built the release === * objDir != srcDir * Release build * llvm-gcc-4.2 from source

Thanks for testing the release. Overall the test results look decent with a couple exceptions. You also have a few CBE failures that I am not seeing. What version of xcode do you have installed? Can you send me the following files? SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/2008-01-07-LongDouble.* SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/PR1386.* Thanks, Tanya On Jan 26, 2008, at 6:43 AM, Takanori Ishikawa

llvm.org is now down. I will notify you when it is back up. This will take several hours. -Tanya On Feb 1, 2013, at 9:05 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > Just a reminder, LLVM.org will be going down in 1 hour. > > Thank you, > Tanya > > On Jan 28, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> To be clear: >>

Just a reminder, LLVM.org will be going down in 1 hour. Thank you, Tanya On Jan 28, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > To be clear: > Friday, February 1, 2013 & Monday, February 4, 2013 > > On Jan 28, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> LLVMers, >> >> llvm.org will be down on 2/1

LLVMers, llvm.org will be down on 2/1 (approximate hours 10pm PST - ?), and 2/4 (8am PST - ?). Email will be sent to the list before and after the downtime. During this time ALL services (svn, web, etc) except for the mailing lists will be down. We are performing a server upgrade that will take some time, so I ask that you have patience. We will try to be as speedy as possible. Please let me

I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the submitted patches (mine or others) were applied. So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya M. Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 9:00 PM Subject:

Just a reminder, please complete your testing by May 21st! Thanks, Tanya ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 00:25:41 -0700 From: Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: 2.3 Pre-release available for testing LLVMers, The 2.3 pre-release is available for testing:

To be clear: Friday, February 1, 2013 & Monday, February 4, 2013 On Jan 28, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > LLVMers, > > llvm.org will be down on 2/1 (approximate hours 10pm PST - ?), and 2/4 (8am PST - ?). Email will be sent to the list before and after the downtime. During this time ALL services (svn, web, etc) except for the mailing lists

I've put the pre-release tar balls here: http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.8/ I'm asking for help to test this release and to review documentation. If anyone can spare some time to help out, I would really appreciate it. The more people that test, the better this release will be. Quick Summary of Important Dates: August 7th - All documentation reviewed and changes checked in. August 8th -

This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:40 AM

On May 19, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the > submitted > patches (mine or others) were applied. > So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? > Please provide me with a link to the patch(s) that need to be applied (llvm-commits archive email). I only apply patches that have been sent to me and

LLVMers, 2.4 pre-release1 testing has come to a close. Over the next few days we'll be working out the remaining regressions and then pre-release2 will be available for testing. I suspect this will be a couple days off the original schedule. Thank you for your patience. -Tanya

> This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html > > I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. I don't believe I can apply this patch. There have been several patches applied recently to TOT to allow MSVC 2005 which I think many people are using. Does this patch mean that one

Dear All, Just a reminder that llvm.org will be unavailable on Feb. 1 (tonight!) and Feb. 4 for backup and software upgrade. That includes SVN services and the web pages. The mailing lists will remain up. -- John T. On 1/28/13 4:28 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > To be clear: > Friday, February 1, 2013 & Monday, February 4, 2013 > > On Jan 28, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Tanya Lattner

LLVMers, Its been 2 months since our last release, so its time to start thinking about LLVM 2.1. Ideally, we like to do releases every 3 months, but the last release was an unusually long 6 month release cycle. For this release, I'm planning to do things slightly differently. I'm proposing the following schedule for our 2.1 release: August 27th - I'll do a comparision of

On 4/16/06, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > I've put the pre-release tar balls here: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.7/ > The build failed on i686-pc-linux-gnu. llvm[2]: Flexing FileLexer.l llvm[2]: Compiling FileLexer.cpp for Release build /home/rogelio/Desktop/llvm/utils/TableGen/FileLexer.l: In function 'int Filelex()':