similar to: [LLVMdev] Labels

Hi R-users,   I have this code below and use some code from sn package for multivariate skew t (rmst) to generate a set of random numbers.   I try to do a looping to produce ‘rand’ for different values of degrees of freedom (degf).  Actually, I’m not sure how to specify the attribute for the rand.  As we know, rand will give us a set of results + all the parameters used, so just wonder whether we

On 11/30/2012 6:36 PM, Lang Hames wrote: > > > RBP is used as the frame pointer on x86 (hence its automatic > appearance in your code), and shouldn't be allocated to any vreg in > function bar. Loading/saving RBP should be managed by the stack frame > setup/teardown code. > If it doesn't already, your allocator should filter out reserved > registers (See

The index files already allowed the 'key[subkey]=...' syntax for keys, but considering such string as whole key. Proper split the parsing and the handling of the subkeys, so they can be searched a bit easier. This causes no actual behaviour changes, it is just internal micro-refactoring. (Thanks Rich for the hints, too.) --- builder/index-parser-c.c | 15 +++++++++++----

The index files already allowed the 'key[subkey]=...' syntax for keys, but considering such string as whole key. Proper split the parsing and the handling of the subkeys, so they can be searched a bit easier. This causes no actual behaviour changes, it is just internal micro-refactoring. --- builder/index-parser-c.c | 8 +++++--- builder/index-scan.l | 9 ++++++++-

Switch the lex/yacc parser into reentrant mode, to ease the handling of parsing-specific data; introduce a new parser_context struct for that, which is added as extra data to the parser. This should cause no behaviour changes in the parsing, just no more global variables used for getting data in/out the parser. --- builder/index-parse.y | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------

--- builder/index-scan.l | 5 +++-- builder/test-virt-index-validate-good-4 | 3 +++ builder/test-virt-index-validate.sh | 1 + 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 builder/test-virt-index-validate-good-4 diff --git a/builder/index-scan.l b/builder/index-scan.l index bdb474b33..49dad72bc 100644 --- a/builder/index-scan.l +++

Introduced in 5cbdf35d651b6c730d62d9af4876039faa122efc, it caused the first character of the value to be skipped if the key has a subkey. --- builder/index-scan.l | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/builder/index-scan.l b/builder/index-scan.l index 7a9618f..e43f82e 100644 --- a/builder/index-scan.l +++ b/builder/index-scan.l @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ extern void yyerror

Hi all, I observed the nature of the LLVM IR and because of the SSA form, it does not preserve function local variable names (like it preserves function argument names). Is there any way to track these local variables? Basically what I am doing is interpreting the IR against an abstract machien where I need to store the value of each program variable at any instance. Here I would get values for

On Sep 29, 2010, at 8:35 AMPDT, Ralf Karrenberg wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I have stumbled upon a test case (the attached module is a slightly > reduced version) that shows extremely reduced performance on linux > compared to windows when executed using LLVM's JIT. > > We narrowed the problem down to the actual code being generated, the > source IR on both systems

Hello everybody, I have stumbled upon a test case (the attached module is a slightly reduced version) that shows extremely reduced performance on linux compared to windows when executed using LLVM's JIT. We narrowed the problem down to the actual code being generated, the source IR on both systems is the same. Try compiling the attached module: llc -O3 -filetype=asm -o BAD.s BAD.ll Under

Hello Guys, I guess that I found a bug in Dovecot 2.2.18 and 2.2.25 versions. The problem it's when I try to connect in a Dovecot used a proxy to another e-mail server (in our case it's a Smartermail Server) the DoveCot send a lot of IDLE commands to the destination server. With that, the LOG files grow and grow and grow :( I make a test with 1 connection only and if you see

Full_Name: Albrecht Gebhardt Version: 0.90.0 OS: osf4.0 Submission from: (NULL) (143.205.61.73) I had to apply the following patch to be able to compile on an alpha with DU 4.0E: ############################################### --- ./src/main/gram.y.mkString-patch Tue Nov 23 12:16:29 1999 +++ ./src/main/gram.y Tue Nov 23 12:16:59 1999 @@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ SEXP mkFloat(char *); SEXP

Hi, following the explainations of the Linux Half-Life Howto I ran into the problem. Since some places are menshioned in the HOWTO, that you should check after this error, I get: root@notch:/home/pwk/wine/wine > ./configure creating cache ./config.cache checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... yes checking whether the

Hi all, while writing a testcase thate needed to do a grep containg {, I found that the DejaGNU test framework didn't handle those very well. It's a bit of a fuss to escape accolades properly, but most of all the framework seemed to silently ignore errors in the escaping (and just not run the command then). See [1]. Fixing the framework resulted in 80 of the tests failing. I spent the

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Aaron Gray wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I partly built LLVM on Cygwin yesterday and it was fine as far as it > > went. But after doing a svn update today I am getting the following > > warning on every compile :- > > > > > > llvm[3]: Compiling LowerAllocations.cpp

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Bill Wendling wrote: > What's the config.log from this run? its attached. -Tanya > > -bw > > On 11/3/05, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: >> >> Following the instructions here: >> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/TestingGuide.html#run >> >> I get an error running configure in the llvm-test directory. >>

This adds a backend_domname field in libxl devices that contain a backend_domid field, allowing either a domid or a domain name to be specified in the configuration structures. The domain name is resolved into a domain ID in the _setdefault function when adding the device. This change allows the backend of the block devices to be specified (which previously required passing the libxl_ctx down

I should mention a couple of useful self-explanatory LLVM flags for triage: -enable-misched=false -verify-misched -Andy On Oct 15, 2013, at 4:43 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > Grats on the work, a long time coming! > > Beware the incoming register allocation bugs ;) > > -eric > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at

Hello, The lack of debian packages for 0.9.13 have made me decide to compile from source instead. So I uninstalled all wine files and downloaded the sources. I'm using a system based mostly on Debian Sarge, but with some backports. I ran ./configure and there were some packages I had to get, but soon it worked well. When I tried make depend the problems started. This is the output I get

Hi, Hi, I'm trying to compile wine-20041019 and this is what I'm getting so far: checking for assembler keyword for word values... configure: error: could not discover how to specify word values with assembler. Below is the who wineinstall I did to the point of failure. Below is my configuration: wino #cat /etc/release Solaris 9 4/04 s9x_u6wos_08a x86