similar to: [LLVMdev] Seperating LLVM representation for processing with different backends

hi I want to use two intrinsic functions which should be placeholders for some instructions which should not be executed by the backend. So these two intrinsics should just keep the data dependencies while i try to separate set of instructions(with more of data flow) to be executed on hardware. One intrinsic which takes care of the data dependencies required for proper execution of the

Hi! I want to know How to count the number of predecessors for each basic block? Thank You ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Hi, I tried creating variable argument intrinsics which are to be placeholders for some instructions which should not be executed by the backend. Kindly help me with the errors in my "migrate_begin" intrinsic creation //Additions made to Intrinsics.td file: def llvm_migrate_begin : LLVMType<iAny>; def int_migrate_begin :

Hi aditya, There are two ways to cound the number of predecessors for each basic block. You can generate the control flow graph using the CallGraphScc pass with the granularity of basic block and can simply traverse the graph bottom up till the root. The number of nodes encountered would be the number of predecessors. The second way would be to use the special ;preds marker in the llvm IR. Each

Hi, I tried creating intrinsics which are to be placeholders for a set of instructions which should not be executed by the backend. In this process I want to replace the uses of each instruction with the intrinsic(Call) instruction. I am puzzled about the return type to be used in the intrinsic defintion(for creating the intrinsic) which is to be included in the Intrinsics.td file. Do we need

<table cellspacing='0' cellpadding='0' border='0' ><tr><td style='font: inherit;'>Hi,<br>I tried creating intrinsics which are to be<br>placeholders for a set of instructions (actually a section of a basic block) to be executed elsewhere(for e.g. in HW).<br>These intrinsics are to take care of the data dependencies of the set of

Hi, I am writing a pass which identifies the parts(basic blocks/functions) of the input algorithm with more of data flow or control flow. These parts are to be separated executed by different backends. My idea is to insert replacement basic blocks with intrinsic instructions within the basic block. These instructions should satisfy the data dependencies within the LLVM data structure and should

Hi, Thank You for the advice and we were able to solve that problem by the following modifications to the Instrinsics.td file. But I now have an "Invalid Intrinsic name" error This error occurs presumably because the created intrinsic is named: llvm.migrate_begin.i32 Intrinsics.gen checks for a string length of 18 (i.e. the length without the .i32). Kindly help me through it.

On Feb 19, 2008, at 1:11 AM, aditya vishnubhotla wrote: > Hi, > I tried creating variable argument intrinsics which > are to be placeholders for some instructions which > should not be executed by the backend. > > Kindly help me with the errors in my "migrate_begin" > intrinsic creation > > //Additions made to Intrinsics.td file: > > def

Hello, LLVM's intrinsic overloading mechanism does not currently support overloading on pointer types. Patches to implement this would be welcome. Dan On May 7, 2008, at 9:25 AM, aditya vishnubhotla wrote: > Hi, > I tried creating intrinsics which are to be > placeholders for a set of instructions (actually a section of a > basic block) to be executed elsewhere(for e.g. in

hi, how to get the number of immediate predecessors for each basic block (arguements of remarks statement at the beginning of the basic block) thank you aditya ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Hi, I have implemented intrinsics which are placeholders for instructions executed elsewhere (e.g. in HW). So i have two types of intrinsics migrate_begin and migrate_end. Now i would like to make these intrinsics known to the PowerPC backend. Since the hardware initialization can not be implemented by one instruction it has to be expanded to a library call or lowered to something the ppc

Hi, I tried creating intrinsics which are to be placeholders for a set of instructions which should not be executed by the backend. I want to retain only intrinsic,phi and terminator instructions in a basic block. I have taken care of the external dependencies of basic block. How do I delete the rest of the instructions? Thank You Aditya P.S:

Hi, I''ve modified the latest acts_as_ferret code (version 0.3.0) to integrate with the Globalize (http://www.globalize-rails.org/globalize/) plugin. Essentially, I''ve added the ability to use a separate index per locale (It basically adds the language code as a suffix to the index and switches between indexes when the active locale changes). Since this introduces an optional

On 07/06/16 at 11:18P, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:09:18 +0800 > Minfei Huang <mnghuan at gmail.com> wrote: > > > The error number -ENOENT or 0 will be returned, if we can not allocate > > more memory in function init_vq. If host can support multiple virtual > > queues, and we fails to allocate necessary memory structures for vq, > > kernel

On 07/06/16 at 11:18P, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:09:18 +0800 > Minfei Huang <mnghuan at gmail.com> wrote: > > > The error number -ENOENT or 0 will be returned, if we can not allocate > > more memory in function init_vq. If host can support multiple virtual > > queues, and we fails to allocate necessary memory structures for vq, > > kernel

Peter, What is your opinion on the following idea. I think we can improve the matching a lot, by delaying the exact matcher to *after* parsing the Report Descriptor and applying subdriver specific routines to get to the serial number, model and vendor names. By doing so, we would probably get more accurate information on especially the serial number, since this is located in non-standard

Hi Vishal, Ruijie, Thanks for your interest in the project. To get started, the first task would be to merge the 5 patches on top of trunk llvm. The list of patches are listed in the project description: http://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html#llvm_mergesim Please create an account in llvm phabricator (reviews.llvm.org) if you haven't already, and put your patches there. Let me know if you have

FYI, The LLVM Performance Workshop will be held at CGO 2017. The workshop is co-located with CC, HPCA, and PPoPP. If you are interested in attending the workshop, please register at the CGO website: http://cgo.org/cgo2017/workshops.html When: Saturday February 4th, 2017 Where: Austin, Texas, USA ---- Hi, CGO workshop and tutorial organizers, This is a friendly reminder that early

Vania Joloboff wrote: > Hello, > > We are a research project in joint french-chinese laboratory. We are > considering using > LLVM in our project but we'd like to have some additional info before > we dive in. > Since we are new kids on the block, please bear with us... > > We are interested in using LLVM for emulation of real hardware. What > we have as >