similar to: [LLVMdev] Utilizing gperf for TableGen

On Jan 1, 2008, at 1:51 AM, Wilhansen Li wrote: > The output of TableGen (intrinsics.gen) seems a bit too clunky > specifically the switching parts (input the string, output the enum). > Moreover, the code makes MSVC barf due to its nesting limit which even > applices to if-else statements. Right, fixing the VC++ issue is straight-forward. I will do it in the next couple of days

FYI, gperf is a very good perfect hash utility written originally by Doug Schmidt (of ACE fame). I used it in XPS for speeding up XML parsing by hashing all the element and attribute names. Unfortunately, its a code generator, which we're trying to get rid of in LLVM. Still, I recommend the tool highly. Reid. On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 13:04:57 -0800 Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>

The output of TableGen (intrinsics.gen) seems a bit too clunky specifically the switching parts (input the string, output the enum). Moreover, the code makes MSVC barf due to its nesting limit which even applices to if-else statements. One one hand, gperf (http://www.gnu.org/software/gperf/manual/gperf.html) offers a way to map strings to records without much difficulty (and it does its job

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Wilhansen Li <krad at crammerz-inc.net> Date: Jan 4, 2008 6:18 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Utilizing gperf for TableGen To: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> It finally compiles well with MSVC. Thanks! On 1/4/08, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > Alright, try this: >

On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Chris Lattner wrote: >This should be fixed now, please verify, thanks! > >-Chris The newer code that TableGen produces is indeed lower however, MSVC still throws the same error messages (and moreover, I don't think they're fixing it anytime soon.. I'll try to re-open this issue to them). Also, it seems that the new code produces an extraneous "if

On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, Wilhansen Li wrote: > The output of TableGen (intrinsics.gen) seems a bit too clunky > specifically the switching parts (input the string, output the enum). > Moreover, the code makes MSVC barf due to its nesting limit which even > applices to if-else statements. This should be fixed now, please verify, thanks! -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

I'm trying to write a tablegen pattern to that matches a sequence of SDNodes and emits again an SDNode and another instruction. The pattern I've written looks like the folowing: def : Pat<(foo (bar GPR:$rs1), simm12:$imm1), (bar (BAZ GPR:$rs1, simm12:$imm1))>; foo and bar are SDNodes, BAZ is an instruction. In particular, bar is defined as follows: def bar :

Hello, > If anybody has an idea of how to fix this (other than using another > version of gcc because I am sick of compiling), I would appreciate. I > can offer backtraces or shell access if anybody is interested, just > ask me what you need. This was fixed couple of months ago. Please consider using current svn top of tree, not 2.3 release. -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov

2008/9/21 Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru>: > Hello, > >> If anybody has an idea of how to fix this (other than using another >> version of gcc because I am sick of compiling), I would appreciate. I >> can offer backtraces or shell access if anybody is interested, just >> ask me what you need. > This was fixed couple of months ago. Please consider

Hi, Oscar > at all, it would be great if you reflect your changes on the file list > inside the corresponding CMakeLists.txt when you add, remove or rename a > .cpp file. Isn't is possible for cmake just to glob everything in the corresponding directory? -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov

Hi, Chris > If the assembler is a limitation, the best solution would be to add a > direct PECOFF writer. There is a start of direct ELF and Macho writers > already in the tree. They are not production quality, but could be a > useful place to start looking. Well, maybe. But in any case I doubt there will be 'open' support for CV debug format :) -- WBR, Anton

Hello, Chuck > I've had a look at the stubs before and I think I'm circumventing them > in the example program since I populate the table and compile the > functions in the order so that things never need to be done lazily, but > I'll look further. Well, anyway stubs are definitely wrong from windows64 and this should be fixed, otherwise funny stuff can happen from time to

Hello, Kevin > build process I described in my original message. So the difference is > more subtle; maybe a difference in the layout of structs or something. Also, there can be another ABI differences. > llvmoutput.c:17976: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of > 'longjmp' differ in signedness Hrm, are you using setjmp/longjmp stuff? They're definitely not

Hello, Kevin. > Well, I already use custom includes with these options: "-nostdlib > -nostdinc -Ipsptoolchain/psp/include > -Ipsptoolchain/lib/gcc/psp/4.1.0/include". But that seems not enough. > GCC has some target-specific behaviour compiled in? Well, in general - yes. However, I'm not sure up to which margin. -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov

Hello, Bill > This merge should go *much* more smoothly than the last merge -- it > could hardly be worse, right? ;-) I already did a test compile of > llvm-test with the patch and it compiled the programs without a > problem. Devang is currently testing it as well so that I have a > second opinion. One thing, which we already saw: please carefully check, that you won't

Hello, Oscar > Anyways, if there is no Mercurial or Bazaar mirrors available, I will > try git. Recommendations on which one to use welcomed. There is git mirror at repo.or.cz: http://repo.or.cz/w/llvm.git, llvm-gcc & clang mirrors are available there as well. I'm updating it 'by hands' currently due to some reasons, so sometimes it will need 2-3 days for changes in llvm

Hi, > (2) on alpha, gcc 4.2.4. The "unknown component name: alphacodegen" > didn't use to occur. My fault, I'll fix it. The problem is that lli wants to link in JIT module, which does not exist for these targets. -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:05 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> libgcc is also available for windows. > Really? What license? What restrictions? Any speed impact over the > VC runtimes? Don't mix VC runtime and libgcc. These are totally different libraries for doing

This commit, which is just code motion, moves the common XDR protocol code (libprotocol) and the common errno handling (liberrnostring) into libraries which are each built once and shared between the library and daemon. --- .gitignore | 20 +++++-------- Makefile.am | 1 + common/errnostring/Makefile.am | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Hello, Everyone > On this specific case, IIRC, MinGW chokes if asmprinter is not on the > list of components. This may be another consequence of the malfunctoning > of llvm-config/GenLibDeps.pl on MinGW/MSYS. This works for me without any problems on mingw32. What are the problems you're seeing? -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov