similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm release criteria?

On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:00:19PM -0300, Mr Dihelson Mendonca wrote: > The problem with Icecast OGG system is that common > people doesn't want to download any other software in > order to listen to a radio station, even a plugin... Of course. But that's not the whole story. Microsoft only supports MP3 because so many people listen to mp3 radio stations and files. And before

Hello, I have table called ''listings.'' There are a certain combination of properties which make a listing viewable (e.g., it is confirmed, has been authorized, hasn''t expired, etc.). Each listing has one and only one category. I want to be able to do things like Listing.find_viewable(...) and Category.find(...).viewable_listings, but I see no way to do this

hi people, i want do change our fallback stream. we have used a fallback mount at the same port that runs our stream. now we have a second stream on a different port. what is the way to mount this stream to fallback mount ? <mount> <mount-name>/</mount-name> <username>*****</username> <password>*****</password>

If this is the same test: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/cond1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1, then it doesn't fail for me on Mac OS 10.8 with ASan (Clang r168632) Have you tried symbolizing the report? On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com> wrote: > Jack, can you please upload this test somewhere?

I am using Redhat Linux and my info is below. I was trying to install the rgl package using R CMD INSTALL and it was doing fine until it got to the compilation of a pixmap program ? Does anyone know what I could do to fix that ? Is it possible that this package is not usable on this platform ? Thanks. sessionInfo() R version 2.5.0 (2007-04-23) i686-pc-linux-gnu locale: C attached base

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1040 Summary: SSH only believes 127.0.0.1 is IPV4 localhost, not 127/8 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 08:53:19AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, > > > Now that dragoneegg is robust in its default usage and the dragonegg svn > > is moderately stable with -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns, it is > > possible to gauge the impact of that feature. Comparing clang 2.9, FSF gcc 4.5.3svn, > > FSF gcc 4.6.0 and dragonegg svn with FSF

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:21:29AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:00:35AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > OK so this looks good. Can you pls repost with the minor tweak > > suggested and all acks included, and I will queue this? > > My NACK still stands, as long as a few questions are open: > > 1) The format used here will be the same as

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:21:29AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:00:35AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > OK so this looks good. Can you pls repost with the minor tweak > > suggested and all acks included, and I will queue this? > > My NACK still stands, as long as a few questions are open: > > 1) The format used here will be the same as

Now that dragoneegg is robust in its default usage and the dragonegg svn is moderately stable with -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns, it is possible to gauge the impact of that feature. Comparing clang 2.9, FSF gcc 4.5.3svn, FSF gcc 4.6.0 and dragonegg svn with FSF gcc 4.5.3svn using the himenoBMTxpa benchmark, the enhancement to code performance from

On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 04:14:17PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, > > > Is there a timeline for when dragonegg might be > > merged into gcc (4.6 perhaps)? I ask because FSF gcc > > has allowed code in as technology previews before. > > For instance, graphite really wasn't that usable in > > gcc 4.4 and produced wrong code in the Polyhedron >

On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:28:15AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: >> So, when these test cases are run, is the binary linked against /usr/ >> lib/libgcc_s.10.5.dylib? or against some just built libgcc_s. >> 10.5.dylib? >> or against some just build libgcc_s.dylib? If either of the >> latter, then >> if you

Hi Jack, thanks for these numbers. > With the commit from http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121203/158488.html, > the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks complete again on x86_64-apple-darwin12. The result are similar to what > were seen with FSF gcc 4.6.2svn and llvm/dragonegg 3.0 (which was the last release that passed pb05) >

On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 05:22:17PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, > >>>> Is there a timeline for when dragonegg might be >>>> merged into gcc (4.6 perhaps)? I ask because FSF gcc >>>> has allowed code in as technology previews before. >>>> For instance, graphite really wasn't that usable in >>>> gcc 4.4 and produced

Hi Jack, > Now that dragoneegg is robust in its default usage and the dragonegg svn > is moderately stable with -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns, it is > possible to gauge the impact of that feature. Comparing clang 2.9, FSF gcc 4.5.3svn, > FSF gcc 4.6.0 and dragonegg svn with FSF gcc 4.5.3svn using the himenoBMTxpa benchmark, > the enhancement to code performance from

Duncan, With the commit from http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121203/158488.html, the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks complete again on x86_64-apple-darwin12. The result are similar to what were seen with FSF gcc 4.6.2svn and llvm/dragonegg 3.0 (which was the last release that passed pb05) http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-October/044091.html. Jack

+glider The compiler hardly matters here, I would expect the same failures with clang. Alex, could you please take a look? --kcc On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote: > Nick, > Can you take a quick look at the asan_eh_bug.tar.bz testcase > I uploaded into the newly opened radr://12777299, "potential > pthread/eh bug exposed

Hi Jack, >>> Is there a timeline for when dragonegg might be >>> merged into gcc (4.6 perhaps)? I ask because FSF gcc >>> has allowed code in as technology previews before. >>> For instance, graphite really wasn't that usable in >>> gcc 4.4 and produced wrong code in the Polyhedron >>> 2005 benchmarks until gcc 4.5. So as long as it

Nick, Can you take a quick look at the asan_eh_bug.tar.bz testcase I uploaded into the newly opened radr://12777299, "potential pthread/eh bug exposed by libsanitizer". The FSF gcc developers have ported llvm.org's asan code into FSF gcc (and are keeping it synced to the upstream llvm.org code). I have been helping with the darwin build and testing -fsanitize=address against the

The reason I didn't use Xcode 2.4 is because I'm running OS X 10.3.9 (Panther). I have not upgraded the OS to 10.4. Xcode 2.4 requires OS X 10.4, according to Apple's website. Do you know otherwise? I think the highest Xcode I can get is 1.5. By the way what does FSF mean? I also tried compiling llvm with the gcc 3.3 that comes with OS X 10.3, and it gave the exact same error