similar to: [LLVMdev] Another Pass Manager Assertion

On Dec 18, 2007, at 10:55 AM, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > The attached code (which is a contrived test case) hits the following > assertion: > > test: > /home/vadve/criswell/src/llvm22/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h: > 226: > AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*, > llvm::Function&) [with AnalysisType = Pass1]: Assertion

Hi, I'm trying to use the function getAnalysis. This is the code I'm using : void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); AU.setPreservesAll(); } virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { LoopInfo &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfo>(); } I get following error when I try to run my pass : opt:

Hello, I was trying to get the loop info in a module pass to be able to iterate over the loops int the module itself. Since my pass requires to make module level changes including adding new types to module hence a looppass cannot be used here. I am getting the following error on running opt. opt: /root/llvm-2.4/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:199: AnalysisType&

Hi, you need something like this in your pass: void YourPass::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>(); } because you need to specify which analysis you are using. Tobi

Hi, Migrating from 3.5 to 3.9. There is a module pass that uses alias analysis started breaking at runtime: llvm/lnx64/llvm/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:236: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(llvm::AnalysisID) const [with AnalysisType = llvm::AAResultsWrapperPass; llvm::AnalysisID = const void*]: Assertion `ResultPass && "getAnalysis*() called on an analysis that was

nitisha warkari wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to use the function getAnalysis. This is the code I'm using : > > void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { > AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); > AU.setPreservesAll(); > } > > virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { > LoopInfo &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfo>(); > >

But this is already present in my pass. And I am not able to understand the cause for the error: opt: /home/ambika/llvm_3/llvm-2.6/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:203: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*) const [with AnalysisType = llvm::DominatorTree]: Assertion `ResultPass && "getAnalysis*() called on an analysis that was not "

ambika wrote: > But this is already present in my pass. > And I am not able to understand the cause for the error: > Can you send a copy of your getAnalysisUsage() method for your pass? There are some funny errors that can occur when you do things that the PassManager cannot handle. For example, if you're requiring a transform pass, that can cause strange assertions from the

Hi, I had a question about this as well. The documentation about writing a pass shows an example like what John wrote, calling a function pass within a module pass on a per function basis. However, if I code it that way, I still get the same error: opt: /x/jeffhao/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:232: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*,

Hello, I have created a ModulePass, that now needs LoopInfo information. The ModulePass registration is taken from [1]. I use clang to directly invoke it (This is also a hard requirement, because I need the fancy output of clang warnings/remarks). The problem is, that the dependency to the LoopInfoWrapperPass does not seem to work. The error is: --- snip --- clang-4.0:

Hey all, We have been working on a pass that uses another pass to count loads and stores prior to performing its own instrumentation. The second pass adds the first as required via the usual getAnalysisUsage function. On one machine, it has been tested and proven to function correctly. On another machine, whenever the second pass is run, it consistently fails the assertion: opt:

Hi, I wrote tiny ModulePass which iterates over functions and then uses getAnalysis<LoopInfo> in order to get informations about the loop. It compiles smoothly, but whenever I try to run it I got error like this: opt: .. PassAnalysisSupport.h:203: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*) const [with AnalysisType = llvm::LoopInfo]: Assertion `ResultPass &&

ambika wrote: > Here is getAnalysisUsage() i am using, > > void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { > AU.setPreservesAll(); > AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>(); > } > > and then I use it as, > > > bool ptrTest::runOnModule(Module &M) { > > DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>(); > ...... >

I have a transformation where I'd like to use both DominatorTree (for ExtractCodeRegion), and DemoteRegisterToMemory (i.e., reg2mem). The transformation is phased, so all occurrences of getAnalysis<DominatorTree>(Function) happen before any occurrence of getAnalysisID<FunctionPass>(&DemoteRegisterToMemoryID, Function). If I register these two passes with DominatorTree first, I

Hi:    I want to do some optimization on MachineLoop. So I want to get MachineLoopInfo from MachineFunction. I reference MachineLICM.cpp. So I try to write a pass in Target/mytarget directory. I find there is Error. llvm/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:198: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*) const [with AnalysisType = llvm::MachineLoopInfo]: Assertion

Here is getAnalysisUsage() i am using, void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.setPreservesAll(); AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>(); } and then I use it as, bool ptrTest::runOnModule(Module &M) { DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>(); ...... } John Criswell wrote: > ambika wrote: >> But this is already present in

Hi Tim, > From: Tim Creech <tcreech at umd.edu> > Subject: [LLVMdev] IVUsers (LoopPass) analysis in a ModulePass? > Date: September 1, 2011 11:46:28 AM PDT > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > > Hi all, > I have a loadable ModulePass which does transformations, and I would like to > use IVUsers analysis within it. I noticed when I try to do this (via > the usual

On Dec 2, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Jeff Yeong-Peng Hao wrote: > > Hi, > > I had a question about this as well. The documentation about > writing a > pass shows an example like what John wrote, calling a function pass > within > a module pass on a per function basis. However, if I code it that > way, I > still get the same error: > > opt:

Sure. I've attached the code for the test pass I wrote, as well as the code and bitcode for the testcase I'm running. All the functionality has been stripped out of the pass, and the pass compiles without a problem, but the error appears when the pass is run. Jeff On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:06:44 -0800, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > On Dec 2, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Jeff

John Criswell wrote: > ambika wrote: >> Here is getAnalysisUsage() i am using, >> >> void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage&AU) const { >> AU.setPreservesAll(); >> AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>(); >> } >> >> and then I use it as, >> >> >> bool ptrTest::runOnModule(Module&M) { >> >>