similar to: [LLVMdev] x86_64 target?

I build llvm-gcc as: ../llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --program- prefix=llvm So it should install into /usr/local/... but add llvm- prefix. This is so llvm-gcc is found by llvm (http://llvm.org/releases/2.5/docs/GettingStarted.html claims that's what it is looking for) and also so there will be no conflict with system gcc. But I see:

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2 at gmail.com> wrote: > OK, let me rephrase this. What is the preferred way to install llvm + > llvm- > gcc onto a fedora system? The preferred way to install LLVM and LLVM-GCC is the same on pretty much any Linux system and described here: http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#starting > Here is what I used: >

This wins the 2007 award for strangest (or most amusing) log message: dovecot: Time just moved backwards by 13 seconds. This might cause a lot of problems, so I'll just kill myself now. It does, unfortunately, leave dovecot dead, which was pretty mysterious to me. Maybe it could re-exec instead?

OK, let me rephrase this. What is the preferred way to install llvm + llvm- gcc onto a fedora system? Here is what I used: ../llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --program- prefix=llvm make make install ../llvm-2.5/configure --enable-optimized --prefix=/usr/local make make install

Missed %{_mandir}/man1/xapian-progsrv.1* diff -u RPM/BUILD/xapian-core-0.9.9/xapian.spec RPM/SPECS/xapian.spec --- RPM/BUILD/xapian-core-0.9.9/xapian.spec 2006-11-09 09:14:38.000000000 -0500 +++ RPM/SPECS/xapian.spec 2006-11-09 09:14:03.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ # RedHat-style .spec file for Xapian # xapian.spec. Generated from xapian.spec.in by configure. -Summary: The Xapian

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15502 Summary: Unknown LVDS configuration bits Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: low Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: pee at

One of the annoyances of ssh is the need to transfer the public key from client machine to server machine, and append to authorized_keys. Although it's simple to do, it's annoying to have to do this manually. Why can't this be automated? ssh offers to add new machine to known_hosts. Why doesn't it offer to add the public key to authorized_keys?

I'm using maildrop to filter mail like: xfilter "/usr/bin/spamc" xfilter "/usr/bin/bogofilter -ep" I want to change to deliver (so I can use sieve) but can deliver do this?

This is on Fedora FC5 x86_64 rpm -q wine wine-0.9.14-1.fc5 winecfg wine: creating configuration directory '/home/nbecker/.wine'... X Error of failed request: GLXBadContext Major opcode of failed request: 143 (GLX) Minor opcode of failed request: 5 (X_GLXMakeCurrent) Serial number of failed request: 166 Current serial number in output stream: 166 wine: wineprefixcreate failed

Things are still broken. Unfortunately llvm test suite does not contain enough vector code to fully test this. Can you revert the patch first? Evan On Feb 24, 2009, at 7:14 PM, Scott Michel wrote: > Evan: > > I did not encounter this back trace before I committed the newest > BuildVectorSDNode patch, which removed all class instance members > and passes results back via

I believe this patch has broken a PPC app that I am tracking. Here is a reduced test case. Reproduce with llc -mattr=+Altivec -mcpu=g5. The backtrace looks like this: #0 0x9333ae42 in __kill () #1 0x9333ae34 in kill$UNIX2003 () #2 0x933ad23a in raise () #3 0x933b9679 in abort () #4 0x933ae3db in __assert_rtn () #5 0x0008bd8f in llvm::MVT::getVectorElementType (this=0xbfffdda4) at

Evan: I work on reverting it, although, when I tried yesterday, it wasn't particularly clean (lots of rejected patches, presumably due to intervening commits.) Are you still getting the backtrace or is this just a case of incorrectly generated code? -scooter On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Evan Cheng <echeng at apple.com> wrote: > Things are still broken. Unfortunately llvm

Trivial hello world program compiles with -O3, but with -O4: (BTW, is there a guide to what different -On mean?) llvm-g++ -O4 Hello.cc -o Hello -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ../llvm-gcc4.2-2.4.source/configure --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/nbecker/llvm-2.4 --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc.

Hi, I tried to compiled ocfs2 on 2.6.32.2 x86_64 but still failed. there are an error blow: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- xattr.c: In function 'check_xattr_entry': xattr.c:250: warning: format '%u' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 7 has type 'long int' xattr.c:287:

Hi, I tried to compiled ocfs2 on 2.6.32.2 x86_64 but still failed. there are an error blow: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- xattr.c: In function 'check_xattr_entry': xattr.c:250: warning: format '%u' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 7 has type 'long int' xattr.c:287:

Gabriel Becker writes: AFAIK R does not automatically copy function arguments. R actually tries very hard to avoid copying while maintaining "pass by value" functionality. ... R only copies data when you modify an object, not when you simply pass it to a function. This is a bit misleading. R tries to avoid copying by maintaining a count of how many references there are to an

Scott, In case you missed it, I reimplemented your BuildVectorSDNode::isConstantSplat method following the suggestions from Chris. The revised version passes "make check" for llvm. Assuming that it also passes Evan's tests, I think it should also do what you need for CellSPU. On Feb 25, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Scott Michel wrote: > Evan: > > I work on reverting it,

Evan: I did not encounter this back trace before I committed the newest BuildVectorSDNode patch, which removed all class instance members and passes results back via reference parameters. -scooter On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > I believe this patch has broken a PPC app that I am tracking. Here is a > reduced test case. Reproduce

In release notes for llvm-2.3 it says LLVM now builds with GCC 4.3. How can I try this?

Now that gmail added imap, I've been trying to see if I can sync gmail/imap with my local dovecot maildir. I've been trying offlineimap. So far, I've created a loop resulting in a directory with size > 1000000 entries. Anyone try this and have a working setup?