Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] MSVC 8 Build"
2007 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] MSVC 8 Build
George,
> I have been experimenting with getting LLVM to build with
> MSVC8 express.
>
> I have succeeded in getting trunk to build and run the
> Fibonacci example in release mode. I have found various minor
> problems with the build system. First, it appears not to be
> able to run the configure subproject commands if there is a
> space in the directory path.
2007 Nov 12
1
[LLVMdev] MSVC 8 Build
Hi,
I had to add an include statement for the math header to
LiveIntervalAnalysis.h to get it to compile today e.g
#ifndef LLVM_CODEGEN_LIVEINTERVAL_ANALYSIS_H
#define LLVM_CODEGEN_LIVEINTERVAL_ANALYSIS_H
#include <math.h>
It seems then to work without failures; odd.
However, the deprecation warnings are not suppressed for std::_Uninit_Copy
and std::_Copy_Opt (warning 4996) in xutility
2007 Jun 12
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM binaries for Windows and more
Hi!
I want to use LLVM for my own "pet" programming language compiler as a backend.
Currently it generates C code, but I am not satisfied with this approach as generating
high-level C (with proper type declarations!) is horrible.
So here are my questions/problems with LLVM:
1.) Are there operations that add, sub, mul integers with overflow checking? How much work would it be to add
2006 Jan 11
4
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.cpp Lexer.l
I can't build LLVM CFE after this patchs
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20060109/030639.html
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20060109/030654.html
Build terminated with messages:
--8X----------------------------------------------
llvm[2]: Compiling Lexer.cpp for Debug build
In file included from
2006 Jan 11
0
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.cpp Lexer.l
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Vladimir A. Merzliakov wrote:
> I can't build LLVM CFE after this patchs
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20060109/030639.html
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20060109/030654.html
This is most likely because you have conflict markers in the generated
files in the lib/AsmParser directory. Try removing
2006 Jan 11
1
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.cpp Lexer.l
For VC++, I solved this by having bison/flex put the files into the obj
directories. I also have it unconditionally regenerate the files if
bison/flex is available, and copy them from src if they are not.
Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Vladimir A. Merzliakov wrote:
>
>> I can't build LLVM CFE after this patchs
>>
2006 Jan 11
1
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.cpp Lexer.l
No solutions come to mind. Conflicts are conflicts and must be resolved
manually. This situation should only occur if you change the .l/.y file
and then update the .h/.cpp files after someone else has changed
the .l/.y file and regenerated the .h and .cpp. That doesn't seem like a
high frequency scenario that we need to worry about. Not sure there's
much we could do even if it was.
Reid.
2009 Jan 08
1
[LLVMdev] Build failure on x86_64
Hello!
I see the following build failure of the sources at the top of the trunk, on
x86_64.
make[2]: Entering directory `<llvm-root>/build/llvm/lib/AsmParser'
llvm[2]: Compiling LLLexer.cpp for Release build
llvm[2]: Compiling LLParser.cpp for Release build
<llvm-root>/src/llvm/lib/AsmParser/LLParser.cpp: In member function 'bool
llvm::LLParser::ParseGlobal(const
2008 Dec 17
5
[LLVMdev] Windows build problems
Folks,
Is anyone else the failure below?
On Mac OS X everything builds properly...
Thanks for any help,
snaroff
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Picture 27.png
Type: image/png
Size: 18959 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20081217/e7d37fee/attachment.png>
2006 Nov 08
0
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Next Steps
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 10:39:46PM -0800, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
> cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm
I'm getting a build error:
llvm[2]: Compiling llvmAsmParser.cpp for Release build
/rest/llvm/llvm/lib/AsmParser/llvmAsmParser.y: In function `int llvmAsmparse()':
/rest/llvm/llvm/lib/AsmParser/llvmAsmParser.y:2105: error: expected `;' before '}' token
2008 Dec 17
1
[LLVMdev] Windows build problems
Sounds like this has to do with Bill backing out r61019, r61030, and
r61040. I think 61031 (which update llvmAsmParser.cpp.cvs, etc.)
should be backed out as well. Can someone do that?
Evan
On Dec 17, 2008, at 7:20 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
> Got it.
>
> On Mac OS, the build process update the llvmAsmParser.cpp.cvs file,
> and then generate llvmAsmParser.cpp from the .cvs
2008 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] Windows build problems
Got it.
On Mac OS, the build process update the llvmAsmParser.cpp.cvs file,
and then generate llvmAsmParser.cpp from the .cvs file.
But on Window, it does not update the .cvs files (probably because
bison is missing), and so, the llvmAsmParser.cpp is not in sync with
the .y file.
As the Mac OS build process update the cvs files, commiting them after
building on OS X should be enough to
2008 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] Disappearing Machine Basic Blocks (for new instruction)
I have a new instruction that takes 2 labels, and in SelectionDAGISel,
I have it doing "CurMBB->addSuccessor()" for both machine blocks. The
DAG node it creates also takes both blocks as SDOperands.
When I lower to x86, the not-fallthrough block disappears. If I run
llc with --fast, the blocks stay around, so it must be an optimization
pass of some sort that doesn't realize my
2008 Feb 13
4
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
Thanks for your comment.
I also tried for LLVM 2.2 but got the same compilation errors on VS2005. (I didn't modify anything before the compilation)
I just wonder if I need bison and flex even just in the case of compiling them on VS2005 without changing anything because the LLVM doc says "If you plan to modify any .y or .l files, you will need to have bison and/or flex installed where
2006 Nov 08
6
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Next Steps
I created the 1.9 release branch last night. As a reminder, please do not
check in any code changes to the release branch. Please send me email if
you have changes that need to be merged into the release branch.
To check out the release branch:
cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm
cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm-test
cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r
2008 Feb 13
0
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
I have always built it with flex and bison installed, though I believe
Chris removed our last dependence on flex a little while back, so you
may not need that. I'm using bison 2.1 which I got from the getgnuwin32
folks. I imagine that if you have cygwin or the like, you probably
already have everything.
You will need to have the executables in your path.
I build with VisualStudio 2k5
2012 May 18
3
[LLVMdev] Adding a New Instruction to LLVM IR
Hello;
I was planning to add a new instruction to the LLVM IR (and later to MIPS
backend) for TLS(Thread level speculation) support. For this I tried to
follow the steps described in http://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM dot
html#instruction.
But I could not find any llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l
and llvm/lib/AsmParser/llvmAsmParser.y file in both the svn repository and
the source code downloaded
2008 Feb 13
4
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
I have flex and bison from Cygwin installed:
$ flex --version
flex version 2.5.4
$ bison --version
bison (GNU Bison) 2.3
Written by Robert Corbett and Richard Stallman.
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Should that work,
2008 Feb 18
2
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
By the way, somebody (I think it was Chuck, but I don't remember for
certain) was asking for the BuildLog.htm from building the llvm.sln file
under VS 2005 SP1 for diagnostic purposes; right now the SLN is configured
to produce a new BuildLog for each and every one of the projects inside the
solution. I don't know who's responsible for this guy, but that's probably
not the best way
2006 Dec 06
4
[LLVMdev] Proposed: first class packed structures
Currently, Structure layout is left to targets, which implement them
according to the ABI of that platform. While this is fine for most
structures, it makes packed structures very ugly. All fields in a
packed type must be converted to byte arrays with casts to access
fields, which bloats accesses and obsfucates the types. First class
support for packed types would clean up the generated code