similar to: [LLVMdev] how to get the address of operand

Programmers’ manual says we can iterate over a use-def chain by op_iterator. It works fine except for load and store instruction of stack variables. For example, a simple bitcode is like the below. i = alloca i32 store i32 0, i32* %i, align 4 %tmp1 = load i32* %i, align 4 If I apply a use-def chain to load instruction, I get alloca instruction. I think store instruction is a correct

Thanks for reply. I have used AllocaInst, it's working but i think it's only for allocating some memory for new variable. And CallInst creates a call instruction. I am looking for creating a add or sub instruction. I used function instruction(), which gives me error "error: cannot allocate an object of abstract type ‘llvm::Instruction’" and also "Instruction.h:28: note:

Can you please give an example of creating an instruction (for example add instructions with two operand a and b)? I am trying instruction() for a while, but no success yet. Duncan Sands wrote: > > Hi, > >> Actually i have to implement strength reduction, for that i have to first >> detect induction variables using ALLEN-COCKE-KENNEDY algorithm. To find >> out

help__me_please wrote: > Can you please give an example of creating an instruction (for example add > instructions with two operand a and b)? I am trying instruction() for a > while, but no success yet. > You need to look for the appropriate subclass of llvm::Instruction and find the method for creating a new instruction. The method is usually a static method and takes arguments

There's an entire tutorial at http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial which includes covers the IRBuilder to generate all sorts of IR, including the add instruction. You can skip ahead to chapter 3 if you just want to see LLVM API, but I suggest you read the whole tutorial if you have the time. Nick help__me_please wrote: > > Thanks for reply. > I have used AllocaInst, it's working but

help__me_please wrote: > Thanks for reply. > I have used AllocaInst, it's working but i think it's only for allocating > some memory for new variable. And CallInst creates a call instruction. I am > looking for creating a add or sub instruction. > > I used function instruction(), which gives me error "error: cannot allocate > an object of abstract type

I am curious if there is any way to list only variables or functions in current environment, rather than listing all objects? Thanks. -- Daehyok Shin (Peter) Geography Department Univ. of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

I am curious if there is any way to list only variables or functions in current environment, rather than listing all objects? Thanks. -- Daehyok Shin (Peter) Geography Department Univ. of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

Hello, how to get the numerical value of an constant operand? For ex. %tmp = mul i32 %indvar, 6 , in this instruction second operand is a numerical constant with value 6. But i am only able to print it by using getOperand(1), not able to store it in any integer variable. Using getName() returns a empty string. Is there any way to solve this problem? Thank you. John Criswell-2 wrote: > >

Currently, enable/disable turbo mode on AMD is broken: $ xenpm enable-turbo-mode 0 <-- works and proper CPU MSR bit is set $ xenpm enable-turbo-mode 1 <-- silently broken, MSR bit not set Since ->turbo is per policy, when user requests to enable/disable turbo mode, we need to set the bit in all of the ->cpus that this policy affects. --- xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/powernow.c | 2

The following code snippet taken from StackColoring::remapInstructions clears a mem operand if it can't guarantee whether the memoperand's underlying value aliases with the merged allocas: // Update the MachineMemOperand to use the new alloca. 522 for (MachineInstr::mmo_iterator MM = I->memoperands_begin(), .... // Climb up and find the original alloca. 532 V =

Thanks John. Your approach worked fine for my small toy program. Now, I would like to run my module pass on a huge project (still a single executable) consisting of a few thousand bit code files scattered in many different directories. And some of them are static libraries. Do you still think it's a good idea to manually gather and link them with llvm-ld? I've seen other module pass

Exactly where does R search for foo.R if I type source("foo.R")? Only from current working directory (same as getwd()), from all directories specified by e.g. $PATH? Thanks. Daehyok Shin

Exactly where does R search for foo.R if I type source("foo.R")? Only from current working directory (same as getwd()), from all directories specified by e.g. $PATH? Thanks. Daehyok Shin

On 8/19/11 4:36 PM, Jinwook Shin (HOTWING) wrote: > > Thanks John. Your approach worked fine for my small toy program. Now, > I would like to run my module pass on a huge project (still a single > executable) consisting of a few thousand bit code files scattered in > many different directories. And some of them are static libraries. Do > you still think it's a good idea

Currently cpufreq and xenpm are out of sync. Fix cpufreq reporting of if turbo mode is enabled or not. Fix xenpm to not decode for tristate, but a boolean. Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com> --- tools/misc/xenpm.c | 14 +++----------- xen/drivers/cpufreq/utility.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/misc/xenpm.c

This is the email I sent last week. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com> Date: Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:04 PM Subject: [PATCH] Minor fix to StackColoring to avoid needlessly clearing mem operands. To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> The following code snippet taken from StackColoring::remapInstructions clears a mem

Hi, This patch removes the magic number "31" for readability. The number "31" means the idle domain ID. In detail: - display the idle domain ID with "Idle" instead of "31" - write to the file "log-idle.log" instead of "log-dom31.log". Signed-off-by: KUWAMURA Shin''ya <kuwa@jp.fujitsu.com> Thanks, -- KUWAMURA

Dear all, I would like to generate bi-variate normal data given that the first column of the data is known. for example: I first generate a set of data using the command, x <- rmvnorm(10, c(0, 0), matrix(c(1, 0, 0, 1), 2)) then I would like to sum up the two columns of x: x.sum <- apply(x, 1, sum) now with x.sum I would like to generate another column of data, say y, that makes

Another bundle of issues from Coverity triage. The first one is in x86/mm, and looks scarier than it is. The others are all in xen/drivers and AFAICT are pretty minor. Cheers, Tim.