similar to: [LLVMdev] build script For ARM

On Oct 26, 2007, at 1:04 AM, Amit Singh wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to build llvm-2.1 and llvm-gcc4 but running into build > errors and not getting the code base compiled successfully since > quite a few time. > > My host OS: Linux(Debian-Ubuntu) > My Host processor: i686 > My target processor: Arm11/Arm9 > Languages support needed: c, c++ > host compiler

Hi, I am trying to build llvm-2.1 and llvm-gcc4 but running into build errors and not getting the code base compiled successfully since quite a few time. My host OS: Linux(Debian-Ubuntu) My Host processor: i686 My target processor: Arm11/Arm9 Languages support needed: c, c++ host compiler version: gcc 4.0.1 I am getting errors while compiling LLVM and llvm-gcc both: The LLVM build error is

Hi, I have downloaded llvm-2.0 source from llvm.org. My machine specs are: OS : Linux(Debian-Ubuntu) Tool Chain: gcc 3.x and gcc 4.x CPU: X86 I have been able to build llvm. I could not find anywhere in the build or documentation that my build of llvm can produce an ARM binary.In the config.log I could see it detected an X86 CPU which is correct since I am using in fact an X86 host CPU. I

Hi, I have downloaded llvm-2.0 source from llvm.org. My machine specs are: OS : Linux(Debian-Ubuntu) Tool Chain: gcc 3.x and gcc 4.x CPU: X86 I have been able to build llvm. I could not find anywhere in the build or documentation that my build of llvm can produce an ARM binary.In the config.log I could see it detected an X86 CPU which is correct since I am using in fact an X86 host CPU. I

Since we are fast approaching the 10th, I thought it appropriate to report this "bug" with the build despite not having worked around it. Build environment is *Summary:* When building llvm-gcc with a arm-apple-darwin target on i686-pc-cygwin, make fails because child calls to configure have an errant semicolon that causes the --srcdir parameter to be ignored by the configure script.

Hello, Martin > llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 is failing to build from source on arm, sparc, > powerpc and ia64, only succeeding on i386 and amd64: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=llvm-gcc-4.2;dist=unstable > so it looks like the 2.5 release was never properly tested before it > was published. Unfortunately, ia64 and sparc were never considered as a 'tier-1' targets

On Aug 21, 2009, at 2:23 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Aug 19, 2009, at 4:30 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > >> On Aug 4, 2009, at 5:33 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >> >>> Hello, Martin >>> >>>> llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 is failing to build from source on arm, sparc, >>>> powerpc and ia64, only succeeding on i386 and amd64: >>>>

On Aug 19, 2009, at 4:30 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > On Aug 4, 2009, at 5:33 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > >> Hello, Martin >> >>> llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 is failing to build from source on arm, sparc, >>> powerpc and ia64, only succeeding on i386 and amd64: >>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=llvm-gcc-4.2;dist=unstable >>> so it

After a recent upstream pull, my builds for ARM thumbv7 suddenly fail with messages like: error: instruction requires: arm-mode 21 uxtah r6, r0, r6 I use llc with -mtriple=thumbv7-unknown-unknown and llvm-mc with -triple=thumbv7-unknown-unkown. What's the right way to generate thumbv7 binaries? Thanks, -steve

fwd'ing to klibc malinglist. ----- Forwarded message from Lo?c Minier <lool at dooz.org> ----- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:34:51 +0100 From: Lo?c Minier <lool at dooz.org> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit at bugs.debian.org> Subject: Bug#618616: arm build failure with latest binutils - usr/klibc/syscalls/_exit.S:29: Error: .size expression does not evaluate to a

I wonder if any body tried implementing morestack for ARM. [ARMFrameLowering.cpp file does not have implementation for adjustForSegmentedStacks method] More I study more I get lost, Any help or input is highly appreciated. TIA, Amit -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Tanya, Bill, Anton and Martin. I have recently set-up and installed a ARM buildbot that have currently been building since August 21. You can follow its progress here http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-arm-linux I have also started to investigate the test failures and writing bugreports. Currently about all test failures except are related to the ExecutionEngine JIT and i am doing

On Aug 4, 2009, at 5:33 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Martin > >> llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 is failing to build from source on arm, sparc, >> powerpc and ia64, only succeeding on i386 and amd64: >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=llvm-gcc-4.2;dist=unstable >> so it looks like the 2.5 release was never properly tested before it >> was published.

I?m trying to build Opus (git master) for iOS, and it doesn?t build unless I disable the ARM assembly. It looks like the problem is that Apple?s assembler doesn?t support all the assembler directives that the GNU assembler does. I suspect this is a combination of the fact that Apple platforms are Mach-O rather than Elf, and just the fact that Apple?s assembler is extremely divergent from the

The following changes since commit 566cf877a1fcb6d6dc0126b076aad062054c2637: Linux 4.10-rc6 (2017-01-29 14:25:17 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus for you to fetch changes up to 79134d11d030b886106bf45a5638c1ccb1f0856c: MAINTAINERS: update email address for Amit Shah (2017-02-03 23:40:36 +0200)

The following changes since commit 566cf877a1fcb6d6dc0126b076aad062054c2637: Linux 4.10-rc6 (2017-01-29 14:25:17 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus for you to fetch changes up to 79134d11d030b886106bf45a5638c1ccb1f0856c: MAINTAINERS: update email address for Amit Shah (2017-02-03 23:40:36 +0200)

Hi guys, I recently became aware that this is being worked on as of recently. A similar thing already exists, though. Those interested in an ARM port may also be interested in taking a look at RedSleeve Linux, which is an ARM port of the same upstream distribution as CentOS. You can look here for more info: http://www.redsleeve.org/about/ http://www.redsleeve.org/ In total 109 SRPMs had to

Thanks. Do you have fixes for the other ARM bloopers? This is the forthcoming Debian version and it's now dying on arm-gnueabi when it links cc2-dummy saying libbackend.a(arm.o): In function `current_file_function_operand': /home/martin/arm/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5/build-gcc/gcc/../../llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:3506: undefined reference to `ENCODED_SHORT_CALL_ATTR_P'

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > The following failures are consistent on buildbot (and my local box). > > The Clang one I think it's assuming an Intel box, the other two look like > the FileCheck are not good enough. > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9/builds/4305 > > Clang ::

Hi, Any help would b appreicated. This is one of my critical assignment. Thanks Sanjeev On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Sanjeev chugh <sanjuchugh at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the reply. We have an product whose one part has lot of > algorithms doing some graphics work. Our intention was to figure out if > there can be any performance gain if we use llvm