similar to: [LLVMdev] using "ocamlc -where" to find ocaml c headers

On Oct 3, 2007, at 01:28, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > I've got ocaml installed in a non-standard location, and while the > svn version of llvm seems to detect my ocaml binaries, it doesn't > seem add "ocamlc -where" to the c include search path. This causes > bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm_ocaml.c to error out unless I run "make > CFLAGS=`ocamlc -where`".

--- bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm.ml | 2 +- bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm.mli | 2 +- bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm_ocaml.c | 2 +- include/llvm-c/Core.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++------------- 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 316a84e85ed2363551149e65a227c8e7c8192624.diff Type:

This is a small bug fix for the ocaml build system that allows for dependencies to be generated for ocaml interface files. --- bindings/ocaml/Makefile.ocaml | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 7c62c2cd93a6402e5f6ebd600e9e3ac7851b4d29.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 994 bytes Desc: not

I noticed that the ocaml compilation isn't using the .opt executables if they're available. We might gain a slight optimization in ocaml compile time by optionally using them with this patch. --- autoconf/configure.ac | 18 +++++ configure | 195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) -------------- next part

Hi Erick, Thanks, this looks good. Can you please resubmit this patch, and the others, as an attachment? On Mar 4, 2008, at 03:19, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > --- > bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm.ml | 2 +- > bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm.mli | 2 +- > bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm_ocaml.c | 2 +- > include/llvm-c/Core.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++ > +-------------

Another quick question. In ./bindings/ocaml/Makefile.ocaml, the configurations when ENABLE_OPTIMIZED<>1 are commented, which set -g flag to $(OCAMLC). Is that for back-compatibility to support OCaml < 3.10.0? On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Erick Tryzelaar <idadesub at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: > Another quick question. > In ./bindings/ocaml/Makefile.ocaml, the configurations when > ENABLE_OPTIMIZED<>1 are commented, which set -g flag to $(OCAMLC). > Is that for back-compatibility to support OCaml < 3.10.0? At the time, we were still supporting 3.09. It sounds like everyone's

On Mar 4, 2008, at 09:18, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > Hi Erick, > > Thanks, this looks good. Can you please resubmit this patch, and the > others, as an attachment? > > On Mar 4, 2008, at 03:19, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > >> diff --git include/llvm-c/Core.h include/llvm-c/Core.h >> index 9b11df5..3676377 100644 >> --- include/llvm-c/Core.h >> +++

I've run into a problem with the ocaml bindings and the jit. It builds fine without the jit, but when I try to include it it tries to use the c object files from the build location, instead of the install location: > llvm-config --libdir --libfiles engine /opt/local/lib /opt/local/lib/LLVMX86.o /opt/local/lib/libLLVMSelectionDAG.a /opt/local/lib/libLLVMCodeGen.a

Chris Lattner wrote: > Patches welcome. Please send a patch, or even just some suggested > text, and we'll be happy to include it. Remember that the people who > usually end up writing the FAQ's already know all the answers, so it's > hard for us to see things from fresh perspectives sometimes :) > > -Chris > Actually, my request for more info in the

Hi everyone,                    I am new in this field. I am trying to install LLVM in my 32-bit Windows XP. Can anyone please give a to do list for installing LLVM in my machine. When trying to build LLVM, I get the following error:    llvm[3]: Compiling llvm_ocaml.c for Debug build In file included from D:\Program Files\Objective Caml\lib/caml/misc.h:24,                  from D:\Program

On 2007-10-02, at 03:19, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On Oct 2, 2007, at 00:17, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> I get this error duing a "make install": >> >> llvm[3]: Installing Debug /usr/local/lib/ocaml/libllvm.a >> install: /usr/local/lib/ocaml/libllvm.a: Permission denied >> make[3]: *** [install-a] Error 71 >> make[2]: *** [install] Error 1

Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > Actually, my request for more info in the "Getting Started" had some > hidden questions, as I don't know the answer to them :) So to be a > little more clear, here are the two I had: > > Does the gcc4 no longer need the "fixheaders" script that the gcc3.4 > frontends uses? > > Is it possible to install both the gcc4 and

Hi, Everyone, I got a error when I try to compile LLVM 2.7, it is located in the ocaml bindings file, showing like: llvm[2]: Compiling llvm_ocaml.c for Release+Asserts build In file included from C:\Objective Caml\lib/caml/misc.h:24, from C:\Objective Caml\lib/caml/alloc.h:23, from /home/leila/llvm/bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm_ocaml.c:19: In file included from

Hi all, I'm authoring a C interface to the LLVM IR type system. Since this is Really Quite Tedious, I would like to solicit opinions before I get too far down any paths that seem offensive. I've attached the header, where I've mapped a portion of Module and most of Type and its subclasses. This is working, and I've built ocaml bindings on top of it.[1] My intent is to

On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > At the code below from > ./bindings/ocaml/executionengine/executionengine_ocaml.c, > we create an OCaml Variant from C. It is from 2.6, the latest 2.7 has > the same code. > > Line 240 Option = alloc(1, 1) assigns tag1 to the 'some' constructor. > In term of

Hi, At the code below from ./bindings/ocaml/executionengine/executionengine_ocaml.c, we create an OCaml Variant from C. It is from 2.6, the latest 2.7 has the same code. Line 240 Option = alloc(1, 1) assigns tag1 to the 'some' constructor. In term of http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/manual032.html, I think the 'some' should have a tag 0. We dont have a runtime error for

This should make it possible to build useful OCaml bindings on architectures other than i386 and amd64 (Debian bug #589809). --- ocaml/Makefile.am | 30 +++++++++++++++--------------- 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/ocaml/Makefile.am b/ocaml/Makefile.am index b3f5e14..b9451e3 100644 --- a/ocaml/Makefile.am +++ b/ocaml/Makefile.am @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ hivex_c.o:

From: Hilko Bengen <bengen at hilluzination.de> On installations where no native OCaml compiler is available, the test program can't be compiled and so we get this message: ,---- | checking for function caml_raise_with_args... not found `---- This breaks building of the OCaml bindings. ,---- | gcc -std=gnu99 -I.. -I/usr/lib/ocaml -I../ocaml -I../lib -g -O2 -fPIC -Wall -c hivex_c.c

On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Gordon Henriksen <gordonhenriksen at mac.com> wrote: > After some experimentation, I'd prefer the closed system. LLVM has some type > peculiarities like the commonality between CallInst and InvokeInst. I find > that the closed type system lets me express such constraints more naturally. > Expressing these constraints explicitly in the open