similar to: [LLVMdev] noinline

Hi Hal, Thanks for your hint! $ /opt/llvm-svn/bin/opt -S -internalize -internalize-public-api-list=main -globaldce hello3.ll -o hello3.dce.ll    it works :) But I argue that `main` Function should be inserted into ExternalNames by default: Index: lib/Transforms/IPO/Internalize.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/Transforms/IPO/Internalize.cpp 

Jack Howarth wrote: > I've had better luck compiling all of pymol 1.1r2 with > -O4 on darwin9. Everythink links and there appears to be > no regressions in the resulting code. I take it that LTO > in llvm 2.5 is still limited to dead code elimination, > correct? No. libLTO does the equivalent to opt -internalize -ipsccp -globalopt -constmerge -deadargelim -instcombine

Which transformation passes are 'safe', meaning it does not worsens the effectiveness of a later pass or the generated code? I imagine all passes which either removes data or add attributes are included in this list, plus some simplification passes: -adce -argpromotion -constmerge -constprop -deadargelim -dse -functionattrs -globaldce -globalopt -gvn -instcombine -internalize

Hi LLVM developers, $ cat hello.c #include <stdio.h> void foo() { } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {   for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {     printf("%d\n", i);   }   return 0; } $ /opt/llvm-svn/bin/clang --version Fedora clang version 6.0.0 (trunk 316308) (based on LLVM 6.0.0svn) Target: x86_64-redhat-linux Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /opt/llvm-svn/bin $

Hello, I have the following simple C code below. It should return '8' as a result. But the returned result is false as it returns '1'. When I remove the line of '__attribute__((noinline))' , the returned results are correct '8'. Any idea? Please advice as I need to get the assembly code of the 'getTexSize' function alone. Note: I compile using the

Hi, I would like to know if there is any plan in the next future to support The GCC noinline attribute? Since LLVM does quiet a lot of inlining, these feature is interesting for us to do some function profiling. Thanks, Lionel. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

All, I'm in the process of upgrading an LLVM client from using 3.8 to using 4.0 and am running into the following issue: // compile with: // clang++ -std=c++11 -Wno-c++14-extensions -S -emit-llvm // ~/chrono.cpp -o chrono.ll #include <chrono> #include <ratio> #include <thread> using namespace std; using namespace std::chrono; using tick = ratio<1, 300>; using

Hi, The basic toolchain is up and running. I encourage community to test this workflow once. It is an addition to the existing contributing mediums. Site: http://clown-olga-13325.bitballoon.com/ Contributing Docs repo : https://github.com/kunaaljain/test-centos-docs ==AIM== Initial Idea : http://wiki.centos.org/GSoC/2015/Ideas#docs-toolchain The CentOS Project needs more short-form

Hi, In my work applying -flto to Chrome, I need to set some names to be skipped by the InternalizePass; otherwise, the linking stage fails (i.e., when building the chrome binary). In the past, I had a tiny patch that I hadn't submitted to LLVM: it was something like: Index: Internalize.cpp =================================================================== --- Internalize.cpp (revision

Hello, Lionel > I would like to know if there is any plan in the next future to > support The GCC noinline attribute? Please fill in bugreport for this. I'll implement it, when time will permit. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

Hi all, After being pointed towards the sssd service, I setup and configured it and it appears to be running just fine. I can lookup my users and groups properly now once I add their information in the UNIX tab section in AD. Thank you all to help me get where I am now. I can now continue to work and set this up. I am sure I will have more questions moving forward, but this mailing list has

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > Here is a proposal that I mentioned sometime ago. Any thoughts,comments or > suggestions on this proposal would be appreciated. > The proposed solution to this problem to encode Function Notes in the IR. > define void @f() notes("opt-size,pic,noinline") { ... } > Here, the notes include a

No, I was adding their info to ADUC before as well before I sent this email to the list. David Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> , 1/15/2015 1:46 PM: On 15/01/15 18:33, David Thompson wrote: > Hi all, > > > After being pointed towards the sssd service, I setup and configured it and it appears to be running just fine. I can lookup my users and groups properly

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Scott Ricketts<sricketts at maxentric.com> wrote: > I wrote a pass that attempts to add up the total size of the global > data in a module. Currently, it iterates through all of the global > values and checks their type sizes using TargetData. I have realized > that this is not quite right because global values can point to the > same data in

I've had better luck compiling all of pymol 1.1r2 with -O4 on darwin9. Everythink links and there appears to be no regressions in the resulting code. I take it that LTO in llvm 2.5 is still limited to dead code elimination, correct? Will LTO ever be extended to inlining across files as well as constant-folding and global data allocation optimizations? Or does the reliance on gcc-4.2 as the

Hi all, I'm quite stuck here at the moment. I have tried this multiple times to get built and can't seem to get it working properly. I have a test virtual server running as a domain controller with Samba 4.1.15 using (9.10.1) bind_dlz as the back end and all works properly. I have the server setup as domain controller and have added a user and I can look that user up with the samba-tool

Here is a proposal that I mentioned sometime ago. Any thoughts,comments or suggestions on this proposal would be appreciated. - Devang // = = =---------------------------------------------------------------------- ===// // Function Notes (or Traits) // = = =---------------------------------------------------------------------- ===// This document describes the

On Sat, 19 May 2007, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >> * It seems that a C-call like printf("---\n") is transformed to puts >> ("---") in the LLVM IR instead of keeping it a printf. What are the >> circumstances in which this happens? Do other similar conversions >> occur? Can this be turned off (lower optimisation level?)? Manually >> replacing the

On 11-02-26 4:25 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > Several people have been proding me to write up my thoughts on how to fix the IR type system for LLVM 3.0. Here are some (fairly stream of conscious) thoughts on the matter: > http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/TypeSystemRewrite.txt Thanks! > Comments welcome! Having fewer types makes the job of the passes easier. Right now we maintain a

Hi Vedant, hi all, My goal is to measure debug info loss of *each* optimization pass in LLVM. I am trying to create a debugify-each mode in opt, inspired by verify-each mode which is supposed to already work. However, if I understand correctly, the verify-each mode (triggered by -verify-each option in opt) only works when we provide a pass list or a pass pipeline. Is this intended? I mean, why