similar to: [LLVMdev] Next LLVM Release (2.2)

LLVMers, The LLVM 2.2 release code freeze and branch creation is less than 1 month away. All major changes should be commited to svn at least 1 week before the code freeze. As a reminder, here is the complete release schedule (which can also be found on the main page in the right sidebar): Jan 16, 2008: Branch creation/Code Freeze (9PM PST). Jan 18, 2008: First round of pre-release testing

On 2007-12-18, at 20:03, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > The LLVM 2.2 release code freeze and branch creation is less than 1 > month away. All major changes should be commited to svn at least 1 > week before the code freeze. As a reminder, here is the complete > release schedule (which can also be found on the main page in the > right sidebar): > > Jan 16, 2008: Branch

Dear Tanya: > You also have a few CBE failures that I am not seeing. What version > of xcode do you have installed? Xcode 2.4.1 > Can you send me the following files? > SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/2008-01-07-LongDouble.* > SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/PR1386.* OK, I attached those files (llvm-2.2-test-output.tar.gz) Best regards, 2008/1/30, Tanya Lattner <tonic at

Thanks for testing the release. Overall the test results look decent with a couple exceptions. You also have a few CBE failures that I am not seeing. What version of xcode do you have installed? Can you send me the following files? SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/2008-01-07-LongDouble.* SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/PR1386.* Thanks, Tanya On Jan 26, 2008, at 6:43 AM, Takanori Ishikawa

LLVMers, The LLVM 2.2 code freeze and branch creation is less than 2 weeks away. All major changes should be commited to svn by the middle of next week. As a reminder, here is the complete release schedule (which can also be found on the main page in the right sidebar): Jan 16, 2008: Branch creation/Code Freeze (9PM PST). Jan 18, 2008: First round of pre-release testing begins. Jan 28, 2008:

LLVMers, The LLVM 2.2 code freeze and branch creation is less than 1 week away. At this point, I'm encouraging everyone to think "stability". Please do not check in major changes and please carefully watch all the nightly tester results when commiting any changes at all. As a reminder, here is the complete release schedule (which can also be found on the main page in the right

My test results for the LLVM 2.2 prerelease. === Q. Target === * Mac OS X 10.4.11 * 2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo * MacBook % uname -a Darwin macbook.local 8.11.1 Darwin Kernel Version 8.11.1: Wed Oct 10 18:23:28 PDT 2007; root:xnu-792.25.20~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 i386 === Q. How you built the release === * objDir != srcDir * Release build * llvm-gcc-4.2 from source

I noticed that llvm 2.2 is slated for release on Feb. 4th of 2008. Do the llvm 2.2 releases mimic those of FSF gcc by requiring no major regressions for the release? For example, would Bug 1462 (CodeGen doesn't fully support i128) likely be fixed for 2.2 (even though it as marked as priority 2)? Also, how are the merges with the Apple GCC 4.2 branch handled? Are those done at some regular

This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:40 AM

I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the submitted patches (mine or others) were applied. So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya M. Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 9:00 PM Subject:

On May 19, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the > submitted > patches (mine or others) were applied. > So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? > Please provide me with a link to the patch(s) that need to be applied (llvm-commits archive email). I only apply patches that have been sent to me and

Just a reminder, please complete your testing by May 21st! Thanks, Tanya ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 00:25:41 -0700 From: Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: 2.3 Pre-release available for testing LLVMers, The 2.3 pre-release is available for testing:

On Feb 12, 2010, at 3:02 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:25 AM, David Greene wrote: > >> On Thursday 11 February 2010 18:17:33 Tanya Lattner wrote: >>> Just a reminder that the 2.7 code freeze is on Feb 21st. >>> >>> All major changes should be committed approximately 1 week before the code >>> freeze to ensure adequate

> This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html > > I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. I don't believe I can apply this patch. There have been several patches applied recently to TOT to allow MSVC 2005 which I think many people are using. Does this patch mean that one

As I saw from the mailing list the MSVC 2005 patches were made to take into account the new files from the development branch, files which are not in the 2.3 release. So for now the below patch is the only one functional for the release. If I am wrong, please someone correct me. If someone can make a 2005 patch for the release branch, it is ok. Else, I am afraid that this one is for now the

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > I am definitely in favor of this if it is ok with Tanya. > > I hope to spend some time in the next few weeks on tracking down > miscompiles, and it would be great to get Clang to the > "early-but-usable-beta" stage so it makes sense to roll binaries for > 2.7. > > Tanya, I can

I am definitely in favor of this if it is ok with Tanya. I hope to spend some time in the next few weeks on tracking down miscompiles, and it would be great to get Clang to the "early-but-usable-beta" stage so it makes sense to roll binaries for 2.7. Tanya, I can also do the x86-32-pc-linux release testing if no one else steps up. - Daniel On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Douglas

LLVMers, I'd like to propose the following release schedule for 2.0: * April 30th - 1 week before code freeze warning email. * May 7th - Code freeze and branch creation. * May 14th - Pre-releases available for additional testing. All documentation changes committed to branch and mainline. * May 21st - Release. If anyone has objection to this schedule, please respond to the list and we can

This is just a reminder that the 2.7 code freeze is coming up very soon. I will create the branch on 3/7 @9pm PST. As we get closer to the code freeze, please do your part to keep the tree as stable as possible. Ideally, we would like to avoid any major changes going in just before the code freeze. So please check in major changes ASAP to ensure adequate testing. Thanks! -Tanya

LLVM Developers, It is now 1 week before I will create the 2.0 release branch. I'm asking that all platform maintainers and available llvm developers review the nightly tester results. Please XFAIL any dejagnu tests that are currently failing, fix any warnings, and review the results of the full llvm test suite. If a test failure is determined to be something that needs to be fixed before