similar to: [LLVMdev] Cygwin support completely dropped?

> > > > I believe Aaron Gray has had success building llvm on Cygwin: > > http://www.aarongray.org/LLVM/BuildingLLVMonCygwin.html > > > > However, those instructions may be a bit out of date... > > Tanya: OK. And how about the clang frontend. Is it usable without having dependencies with the rest of the infrastructure? Which are your typical Linux platforms

> it seems that it has been sometime that anyone had success with building llvm > (2.0 or 2.1 prerelease) on Cygwin/XP. i have been using gcc-4.0.2 with no > success. > > is anyone working on Cygwin or not? i feel that having Cygwin as a supported > platform is at least misleading since noone is building on Cygwin. > > I recall llvm-1.4 to 1.6 building decently on Cygwin

On Sep 25, 2007, at 6:54 PM, nkavv at physics.auth.gr wrote: >>> >>> I believe Aaron Gray has had success building llvm on Cygwin: >>> http://www.aarongray.org/LLVM/BuildingLLVMonCygwin.html >>> >>> However, those instructions may be a bit out of date... >>> > > Tanya: > OK. And how about the clang frontend. Is it usable without

Hello, Well theres not too much to it. A patch for Cygwin's stdint.h. And a patch for lib/System/Unix/Program.inc. Despite Cygwin complaining of timing errors both LLVM and LLVM-GCC4 compile ok'ish. make[2]: Warning: File `/dev/null' has modification time 0.0096 s in the future make[2]: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build may be incomplete. I am getting this on both

Hello, Aaron > I don't have the external testsets installed. Make sure you have llvm-gcc path properly specified to llvm configure. --- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

What is the recommended way to get a front-end to run on Windows? I have been able to successfully compile on Linux. I'm worried about documents stating all the shortcomings of the Visual Studio compiled version, but I do have mingw. Is there a guide for using mingw to compile? I thought about compiling to IR, but the documentation said the language is not stable.

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:32 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Aaron Gray wrote: > > I am trying to build llvm-test in a separate directory to the main llvm > tree. > > > > I have put llvm and llvm-gcc's bin directories on the path but think I am > missing a switch on the configure command. > > > You need to use --with-llvmsrc and

Hi Duncan >>> br i1 %38, label %17, label %39 >>> ; <label>:39 ; preds = %._crit_edge >>> ret void >>> >>> However, ";" is a comment-line character. How is this interpreted, as a >>> meta-comment? (a semantically important comment)? >> >> it's just a comment and has no

Hi Nikolaos, Following commands work great for me. $ clang -S -emit-llvm -target nvptx -x cl -include clc/clctypes.h ../data-types/scalar.cl $ llc -mcpu=sm_30 scalar.s You can follow Justin's blog [1]. It helped me a lot to understand where to start. [1] http://jholewinski.org/blog/llvm-3-0-ptx-backend/ Best, Ankur On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Justin Holewinski < justin.holewinski

Alright, couple of points here: 1. Address space 0 is invalid for global variables. This is causing a crash in llc where we use llvm_unreachable() on this case. This is most likely why you're seeing llc run forever. The fix for this is to use address space 1 for globals, which puts them into PTX global memory. On our side, we should provide a meaningful error message in this case. 2. The

Hi Duncan >> br i1 %38, label %17, label %39 >> ; <label>:39 ; preds = %._crit_edge >> ret void >> >> However, ";" is a comment-line character. How is this interpreted, as a >> meta-comment? (a semantically important comment)? > > it's just a comment and has no semantic comment. You can delete

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:09 PM, <nkavv at physics.auth.gr> wrote: > Hi Justin, > > > Has anyone had similar problems with the NVPTX backend? Shouldn't this >>> code be linked to the AsmPrinter library for NVPTX (already)? >>> >> >> What do you mean by "doesn't work"? The AsmPrinter library really houses >> the MCInst

Hi, > Can you post the llc command line you're using? Can you post an LLVM IR > file that causes this behavior? yes: ${LLVM_PATH}/bin/llc -o helloworld.s -march=nvptx helloworld.ll where LLVM_PATH my local installation path for LLVM. Also attaching helloworld.c: #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { printf("Hello World!\n"); return 0; } and helloworld.ll:

Hi Justin, >> Has anyone had similar problems with the NVPTX backend? Shouldn't this >> code be linked to the AsmPrinter library for NVPTX (already)? > > What do you mean by "doesn't work"? The AsmPrinter library really houses > the MCInst printer, which isn't implemented for NVPTX yet. The older > assembly printer works just fine. This is

Hi there i'm trying to build LLVM2.0 (enabled-optimized) on Cygwin/x86, gcc version is 4.0.2. Do you have any suggestions for a Cygwin build? Here follows the error log: make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/Temp/devtools/llvm-build/lib/VMCore' llvm[1]: Compiling Function.cpp for Release build /cygdrive/c/Temp/devtools/llvm-2.0/lib/VMCore/Function.cpp:272: error: 'const

Hi there i would like to ask a few questions to the developers responsible for the register allocator(s) design in LLVM (Fernando and other people). First of all, congrats on providing more than one option for register allocation. Now to the questions: 1. I can see the standard algorithms (bigblock, linearscan -- good choice for the JIT and for general use as well, and the other algorithms).

Hi all, i'm writing a TXL (http://www.txl.ca) grammar and a revamp of bison/flex grammar for LLVM. I've noticed an inconsistency regarding label naming conventions. For instance, the following is a segment of legit LLVM assembly (human-readable) IR: br i1 %38, label %17, label %39 ; <label>:39 ; preds = %._crit_edge ret void

> From: "Wilfred L. Guerin" <wilfredguerin at gmail.com> > Subject: [LLVMdev] LLVM Expansions > > It is very relevant that LLVM look into handeling HDL and other binary > and analogue operation modeling capbilities, as well as expand this what is binary? you mean digital right? > Without confirming the true characteristics of the lower structure > types and

Hi there, I have a question on the LLVM internals. Is it possible to dump an InstructionList (i.e. a (possibly) naively scheduled assembly) prior register allocation? Does LLVM use infinite (virtual) registers similar to MachSUIF? This is, of course, meant for a given target in contrast to MachSUIF that features the SUIFvm ISA as low-level IR and such a dump is possible at this point. Plus:

perhaps one should ask why a compiler has not compiled itself to binary and requires a 3rd party compiler to exist. Someone please send me lli that works on a pxa270 (which has never been tested?) and make sure it runs in PocketPC(win) so I dont have to wait another 20 hours to compile a damned compiler. On 7/24/07, nkavv at physics.auth.gr <nkavv at physics.auth.gr> wrote: > >