similar to: [LLVMdev] lli vs JIT diffs on FCmp::ne with NaN operands

We''re building for one case (CONFIG_ACPI_PCI defined) only, yet still had the other case''s code in there. Additionally there was quite a bit of pseudo-duplication between disabled(!) DMI scan and ACPI boot code. acpi_pci_disabled had only a single reader, which is off by default (i.e. must be enable on the command line), so it seems pointless to keep it. Signed-off-by: Jan

I have the following setup: DS3 -> Cisco AS5400 -> H.323 (ooh323) -> Asterisk Inbound calls work great but outbound calls fail. So to check and make sure we have outbound calling ability on the DS3 we setup a Cisco Call Manager Express and it can make outbound calls both local and long distance with no problems. The failure code is Cause i = 0x8381 - Unallocated/unassigned number. We

On Jul 3, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Richard Osborne wrote: >> >> This seems to break the convention. It should be the responsibility >> of the caller to further legalize the results. >> >> Evan > That makes sense. In that case I believe > SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeSetCCOperands > should be legalizing the result. The description of this function > says

Evan Cheng wrote: > On Jul 3, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Richard Osborne wrote: > >>> This seems to break the convention. It should be the responsibility >>> of the caller to further legalize the results. >>> >>> Evan >>> >> That makes sense. In that case I believe >> SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeSetCCOperands >> should be

Hi all, I was wondering if it is possible to match the icmp and fcmp assembly language instructions in the code generator. For example, for the following code: %cmp = icmp sgt i32 %tmp, %tmp1 ; <i1> [#uses=1] br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %if.else We would like to see something like: SGT cmp, tmp, tmp1 BR cmp lbl However, I can't see any case in the back-ends

Hey everyone, just wondering if there are any other people on the list in Omaha, NE that would be interested in getting together and chatting about rails. Cheers, - Matt -- Matt Secoske http://www.secosoft.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060226/93c1467b/attachment.html

ANLEGER UHR BJ5N.F!!! DIE RALLYE IST GESTARTET Firma: BOERSE INVEST BETEI WKN : 797639 ISIN : CH0012802093 Markt: Frankfurt K=FCrzel : BJ5N.F Preis: 1.90 5-Tag Prognose: 3.00 KAUFEN KAUFEN KAUFEN! BJ5N.F ESGESCHAFT FIN UNTER PARI! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments=

DanKegel wrote: > > > For vineyard compatibility, don't explode if a wineprefix has spaces > in the subdir name. spaces have always been an issue for me causing problems.... I even had to put checks in Wineskin to warn users to temporarily move and rename things to get rid of spaces so Winetricks would work. Does this mean that in all cases spaces should no longer be an issue?

NE and EQ comparisons should be able to commute their operands. But, for ARM at least, this does not seem to be happening. The first sequence below generates CMN (compare negated) but the second does not (complete test attached). These seem to map to ARMcmpNZ. Where would I look to see if that is marked commutative? %nb = sub i32 0, %b %tmp = icmp ne i32 %a, %nb %nb = sub

I have several too and I also see this problem on occasion. Like you say, it is fairly rare and I can't pinpoint a cause or tell if it is a symptom of something else. I think I wrote to tech support about it but never heard anything. I'm wondering how long they will continue to support the phone. -Nate > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerry Geis

Anyone seeing this? /etc/cron.daily/rkhunter: /usr/bin/rkhunter: regel 13967: [: eenzijdige operator werd verwacht, -ne gevonden Translating: line 13967 unary operator expected -ne found Line 13967 is: if [ `${IPCS_CMD} -u 2>/dev/null | awk -F' ' '/segments allocated/ {print $3}'` -ne 0 ]; then rkhunter 1.4.2 release 1.el6 from epel on a CentOS 6.5 Thanks Patrick

> On Apr 29, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 29, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Silviu Baranga <Silviu.Baranga at arm.com <mailto:Silviu.Baranga at arm.com>> wrote: >> >> Note that dividing by an integer constant should be a cheap operation >> compared to FP multiplication and comparison as this would get lowered to a

Hello. I'm not sure what this problem is. Probably one of my libraries. Any clues ?? ---------------cd ../asterisk then make clean ; make install gcc -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g -Iinclude -I../include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O6 -march=i686 -DZAPTEL_OPTIMIZATIONS -DASTERISK_VERSION=\"CVS-01/25/04-16:37:41\"

On Jun 23, 2008, at 5:35 AM, Richard Osborne wrote: > I'm trying to write a backend for a target with no hardware floating > point support. I've added a single i32 register class. I'm wanting all > floating point operations to be lowered to library function calls. For > the most part LLVM seems to get this right. For example > > define double @div(double %a, double

As many of us suffer this problem I would like to share my success with the list. This weekend I made this configuration work ! After this procedure you can access the samba machine, from any client (Win-XP, Win2k, Win2k3, Win9x and WinNT) using \\samba-netbios-name\share-name (using kerberos) or \\samba-ip-address\share-name (using NTLM) Debian Woody 3.0R2 Samba-3.0.4 MIT Kerberos 1.3.4 Windows

Hi, I'm trying expand the Float2Int pass in order to make it able to optimize expressions like f * x > y, where x and y are integers (we'll assume unsigned for simplicity) and f is a floating point constant. The optimization would convert the expression to something like: (a * x)/b > y where a and b are integers guessed by the compiler (currently using continued

Good morning all; Whils't running chkrootkit 0.42 on one of my 4.7-REL boxen it reported : <snip> Checking 'biff'...not infected ]: not found [: -ne: argument expected Checking 'chfn'...not infected ]: not found [: -ne: argument expected <snip> I've been unable to locate any information ref. the " ]: not found " and " [: -ne: argument

I'm trying to write a backend for a target with no hardware floating point support. I've added a single i32 register class. I'm wanting all floating point operations to be lowered to library function calls. For the most part LLVM seems to get this right. For example define double @div(double %a, double %b) { %result = fdiv double %a, %b ret double %result } is expanded to a

hi all i suggest to create a goup in hotmail in order to discuss any problem on line in msn i think it's more practical than e-mail group Protek-on: CaraMail met en oeuvre un nouveau Concept de S?curit? Globale - www.caramail.com

On Jun 25, 2008, at 5:13 AM, Richard Osborne wrote: > Evan Cheng wrote: >> On Jun 23, 2008, at 5:35 AM, Richard Osborne wrote: >> >>> I'm trying to write a backend for a target with no hardware floating >>> point support. I've added a single i32 register class. I'm wanting >>> all >>> floating point operations to be lowered to