similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm 2.1 announcement draft

Hi All, LLVM 2.1 is done! Download it here: http://llvm.org/releases/ or view the release notes: http://llvm.org/releases/2.1/docs/ ReleaseNotes.html The LLVM 2.1 has many improvements, including three new front-ends, a huge reduction in -O3 compile times, a new (beta) MIPS backend, and many optimizer/code generator changes that allow LLVM to produce better code. In addition to new

OK, so I pulled down the two MinGW32 binaries. I bzip2 -d the two into .tar files, then tar xvf them into my directory of choice. (C:/Prg/llvm-2.1 in this case.) When I run the compiler over hello.c, as per the Getting Started Guide, compilation works for both native and LLVM BC. When I run the native hello.exe, it works. When I try to run lli hello.bc, I get an unsatisfied DLL link error:

On Friday 21 September 2007, Chris Lattner wrote: > In addition to this, I've checked in the first draft of the release > notes into llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.html (http://llvm.org/docs/ > ReleaseNotes.html). The release notes mention llvm-gcc 4.2, but the prerelease only included llvm-gcc 4.0. Is the final release going to include 4.0 or 4.2 or both? Bye, Maarten --------------

>> In addition to this, I've checked in the first draft of the release >> notes into llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.html (http://llvm.org/docs/ >> ReleaseNotes.html). > > The release notes mention llvm-gcc 4.2, but the prerelease only included > llvm-gcc 4.0. Is the final release going to include 4.0 or 4.2 or both? I will be releasing a source tar ball of llvm-gcc4.2, but

Please take a look: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

Hi All, Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take a look and send me any comments or feedback you have: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Thanks! -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Hi All, > > Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take > a look and send me any comments or feedback you have: > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > Trivial changes: * Most of LLVM is now built with "-pedantic", ensuring better portability to more C++ Compilers. Probably

Hello Chris Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:28:44 -0700 (PDT) you wrote: > Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take a > look and send me any comments or feedback you have: > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html I think list of platforms should include "Intel and AMD machines running on Win32 using MinGW libraries (native)". Or something like this. -- With

misspellings: What's new, 1st paragraph: "nightly tester <http://llvm.org/nightlytest/>, llvm-config enhancEments"; 've found nothing wrong except of it :) On 8/8/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take a look > and send me any comments or feedback you

> Please take a look: > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html GCC4.0-based llvm-gcc front-end section: Replace the second "in addition" with something else. "If you can use it, llvm-gcc4 is offers significant new functionality": remove is "In 1.8, it will be removed, replaced with the new SPARC backend." and replaced (no comma) "now have initial

> We will be branching for the 3.3 release one Monday, May 6th at 5PM PDT (Tuesday, May 7th 12:00 midnight GMT). I noticed there is a 3.3 branch in svn, but not in git. Anton, are you still the one managing the git repos? Also, I just added a note to the release info on trunk before noticing we had branched. I was about to port it over, but then noticed that

Hi Everyone, It is getting to be that time again. I've scoured llvm-commits and collected a list of some of the major features we've developed since the last status update (from Feb 21). Please take a look and send me (off list) additions, feedback, corrections, etc. As usual, if I missed something, it's probably because there is such a huge amount of stuff happening,

>> Dear All, I have been trying for days but still cannot break this barrier. May I get your help? I have compiled llvm-2.1 successfully and make install. When I proceed with llvm-gcc-4.2-2.1, however, I keep getting linking error as attached. Some functions with totally different content conflict with each other in linking process. That is a Linux box (Debian, with 2.6.23-1

Thanks all, I've incorporated all the feedback so far: http://llvm.org/ChrisLLVM/projects/llvm-www/releases/1.8/docs/ReleaseNotes.html -Chris On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Bil wrote: > On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take a look >> and send me any comments

Hi All, I am done with my first pass over the release notes, you can see them in mainline here: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html In addition to the inevitable typos and other things that need to be cleaned up, there are several todo's for specific people: 1. All: please let me know if there is something missing that I forgot. 2. Daniel, please update the clang section [DANIEL]. 3.

Hi, I am having some difficulties building llvm on Itanium. My procedure for building LLVM is: cd /liberty/llvm.ia64/llvm-2.1 ./configure make ENABLE_OPTIZED=1 cd /liberty/llvm.ia64/obj /liberty/llvm.ia64/llvm-gcc4.2-2.1.source/configure --prefix=/liberty/llvm.ia64/install --enable-llvm=/liberty/llvm.ia64/llvm-2.1/ --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-shared The build of llvm seems to

Hi, I've figured out a little more. #if defined DBX_DEBUGGING_INFO || XCOFF_DEBUGGING_INFO guards the declaration of type_queue, however, neither is defined on Intanium. In gt-dbxout.h type_queue's uses are unguarded and thus are undefined on Itanium. When I compared llvm-gcc's gt-dbxout.h with FSF gcc's, I found that type_queue was never used in FSF gcc's version. Does

On Jan 10, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Thomas Jablin wrote: > Hi, > > I've figured out a little more. #if defined DBX_DEBUGGING_INFO || > XCOFF_DEBUGGING_INFO guards the declaration of type_queue, however, > neither is defined on Intanium. In gt-dbxout.h type_queue's uses are > unguarded and thus are undefined on Itanium. When I compared llvm- > gcc's > gt-dbxout.h

Hi Akemi, Thank you for granting my request. I just finished translation : http://wiki.centos .org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7/Korean May i change Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 <http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7/Korean> translation part for link to Korean Release note ? I couldn't make my personal homepage, it says "You are not allowed to edit this page" :)

I am pleased to announce that LLVM 10 is now available. Get it here: https://llvm.org/releases/download.html#10.0.0 This release is the result of the LLVM community's work over the past six months (up to to e26a78e7085 on master plus commits up to d32170dbd5b on the release/10.x branch). Some highlights include: - C++ Concepts support in Clang - Clang no longer runs in a separate process