similar to: [LLVMdev] Build problems, LLVM 2.0's GCC front-end.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 90 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Build problems, LLVM 2.0's GCC front-end."

2007 Sep 24
0
[LLVMdev] Build problems, LLVM 2.0's GCC front-end.
Chris, > As was mentioned, please configure with --enable-languages=c,c++. > More generally, make sure you follow the instructions in README.LLVM > at the top of the llvm-gcc source tree. I think my objc-unbreak patch for 4.2 should be applied to 4.0 as well. I'll investigate. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State
2008 Feb 15
2
[LLVMdev] Some blogged LLVM experience.
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 09:06 +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > Does ruby compile ruby code to native instructions and execute them? No. Ruby is an interpreted language. The latest version has a VM that it targets -- YARV -- but it still does not compile to native like, say, a JIT would. > Otherwise it probably means that llvm-gcc miscompiled something. This is what I'm guessing at
2008 Feb 15
3
[LLVMdev] Some blogged LLVM experience.
http://snakeratpig.blogspot.com/2008/02/alternative-compiler-suites.html Executive summary: LLVM-GCC was consistently faster and its output consistently faster than plain old GCC when compiling and using Ruby 1.9. Both compilers failed spectacularly on the full regression suite, but GCC lasted longer and did more tests before exploding. If I could find a comprehensive Erlang testing suite,
2008 May 13
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM as a DLL
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 16:30 +1000, kr512 wrote: > Michael T. Richter wrote: > > Apparently the APIs in the LLVM docs missed your > > attention. They're sneaky that way because, you know, > > they just form the bulk of available documentation. > I began my original message saying that I was providing > "constructive criticism". That means I want to
2006 Dec 21
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM capability question.
I'm losing my sanity, so I thought I'd try and generate an LLVM target for the Glasgow Haskell Compiler (GHC). In talking to some of the people in the GHC mailing list some issues have come up that I can't find a ready answer to. (Others came up that I could, so I don't feel quite as stupid or helpless as I could.) 1. Is there any way to hint that a global pointer variable
2005 Apr 04
2
rsync is flaky going to Penang
Hello, We are experiencing flaky behavior from rsync when attempting to rsync directories/files to a server in Penang. Several times the job seems to 'hang' and never completes. Penang then is therefore missing a lot of required cad files. Have any of you experienced the same thing and what did you do to fix the problem? Does anyone know of a better tool to use? We chose
2007 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] OK, how does this work?
Hi Michael, On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 10:24 +0800, Michael T. Richter wrote: > I'm trying to get LLVM1.9 working on my Ubuntu 6.10 system. The LLVM > version in the repositories is 1.7 and I've never managed to get it > successfully working because whoever packaged it thought it would be > fun to rename everything. This means I can't use it to build 1.9 and > I've
2007 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] OK, how does this work?
Hi Michael, On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:13 +0800, Michael T. Richter wrote: > On Tue, 2007-16-01 at 02:50 +0000, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > The build instructions provided tell me to build llvm-gcc first from > > > the source. > > > The source for that tells me to build llvm first from the source. I'm > > > not sure where to go from this point. >
2001 Apr 12
0
FW: 'mksmbpasswd.sh' Usage
Never mind, I figured this one out (I think!). Here is what I ran [System: RedHat 7.0/Samba 2.0.7ssl on P-90] cat /etc/passwd | /usr/bin/mksmbpasswd.sh >> smbpasswd (After backing-up the current 'smbpasswd', of course) This seemed to do the trick, however, all of the accounts where disabled by default. I figured this to be the intended behavior (for security with system
2007 Jan 16
3
[LLVMdev] OK, how does this work?
I'm trying to get LLVM1.9 working on my Ubuntu 6.10 system. The LLVM version in the repositories is 1.7 and I've never managed to get it successfully working because whoever packaged it thought it would be fun to rename everything. This means I can't use it to build 1.9 and I've therefore decided to try bootstrapping a 1.9 build. Yes, I've looked at the docs where it said
2004 Jun 24
3
The "median" function in R does not work properly.
Hi, 1.) The "median" function does not work well. Please refer to the data below (same data is attached as txt-delimited). This is what I try to do in R: median ( dataf [2:9] ) I get warning: "needs numeric data" 2.) BUT if apply the median to a single vector: median ( dataf [,2]] ) then it works: 3.) How come the "median"
2006 Oct 03
1
Samba 3.0.23c memory usage increased ten fold to over 70Mb / smbd process
Hi, I'm running samba 3.0.23c on Solaris 10. The smbd processes on my PDC have increased in size from 7Mb to upto 86 Mb , the majority of which seems to be resident . 3940 root 77M 72M sleep 59 0 0:00:01 0.1% smbd/1 14174 root 77M 73M sleep 59 0 0:00:10 0.1% smbd/1 13551 root 77M 73M sleep 59 0 0:00:18 0.1% smbd/1 19888 root 77M
2003 Jun 29
2
rsync/jscript/cygwin problem
I'm using a javascript program to execute rsync 2.5.6 compiled with cygwin on Windows XP Pro machines. These backup the user's "My Documents" folder to a Linux server running rsync 2.5.6 in daemon mode when the user logs in to XP and certain conditions are met (e.g. user hasn't backed up for a few days, user on the network etc). This works great except every now and then
2007 Jun 26
0
gcc and g++ errors while compiling R on Linux ppc64
I was going through the config.log after installing R successfully on a Linux ppc64 machine. However, I could not install the MCMCpack and looked at the config.log file for gcc and g++ errors.I found some of them and have pasted them below. Please let me know if they can affect the installation of other packages on R. ------------------ configure:7479: checking whether we are using the GNU
2007 Jan 16
2
[LLVMdev] OK, how does this work?
On Tue, 2007-16-01 at 02:50 +0000, Reid Spencer wrote: > > The build instructions provided tell me to build llvm-gcc first from > > the source. > > The source for that tells me to build llvm first from the source. I'm > > not sure where to go from this point. > You should build llvm first, then llvm-gcc. When I build LLVM first, however, I get told that it
2010 Apr 22
2
rpm -U query
CentOS, RHEL, all versions. Suppose I am upgrading a package foo-1.0 to foo-2.0 (assume foo is not relocatable), and both packages have %preun sections in their .spec files. It appears that foo-1.0's %preun is run after foo-2.0 has been installed. So what happens if foo-1.0 needs to run a binary that was provided as part of foo-1.0 during its %preun stage, and a binary of the same name is
2009 Oct 10
1
@2.0, --sysconfdir incorrectly populated with dovecot/*.conf
to document from #irc, in 1.2.x, specifying ./configure ... --sysconfdir=/path/to/dir ... correctly results in dovecot.conf looked for as "/path/to/dir/dovecot.conf". in 2.0, dovecot incorrectly creates a dovecot dir in the sysconfdir, and looks for, /path/to/dir/dovecot/dovecot.conf 2.0's behavior should be made consistent with the correct implementation in 1.2.x, or
2016 Sep 28
0
?==?utf-8?q? samba-tool domain join DC hangs
hi again, now the join finished but ... i have a high CPU load caused by a samba-process. Samba is consuming 100% of one CPU and the replication fails. Is my AD to large???? root at dc2:# samba-tool drs showrepl Default-First-Site-Name\DC2 DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object GUID: e9d31c7e-acb3-4473-823a-39b06ab9fa95 DSA invocationId: 49a80da8-975f-49ef-834b-224b2bbf0805 ==== INBOUND
2013 Dec 20
2
blockcopy for libvirt and version compatibility
I'm currently running: virsh --version 1.0.2 libvirtd --version libvirtd (libvirt) 1.0.2 I have a couple questions. 1. Can I upgrade my libvirt.so version to use with an older libvirtd? In other words, does the versions of libvirt and libvirtd need to be in lock step? 2. I'm able to use virsh blockcopy, but I want to do it programmatically via C. I looked through the API and was not
2016 Sep 28
0
?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? ?= samba-tool domain join DC hang
Hi Denis, yes, the problem initiated after changing the primary group of all my 11034 users. I changed the primary group to different groups. This caused that now every user is member of the LDAP object "Domain users" ldapsearch -LLL -x -h dc1 -x -b "cn=domain users,cn=users,dc=example,dc=net" member | grep ^member: | wc -l 11034 After this action the replication