similar to: [LLVMdev] Building with Microsoft Visual Studio

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Building with Microsoft Visual Studio"

2007 Sep 20
1
[LLVMdev] Building with Microsoft Visual Studio
Hi Richard, > Unfortunately, I believe the issue is not that Cygwin contains GPL code, it > is that applications which it compiles do. This is explicitly stated at > http://cygwin.com/licensing.html: > If you have serious questions about the licensing of Cygwin/LLVM, you really need to talk to a lawyer. No one on this list can give you advice in that area which will accurately reflect
2007 Sep 20
3
[LLVMdev] Building with Microsoft Visual Studio
I am working on a port of LLVM targeting a proprietary VM. Thus far development has been under Linux and Cygwin. Cygwin licensing would appear to require that LLVM built under Cygwin would have to be released under the GPL, so alternatives are being investigated. Using MS Visual Studio and following the instructions at http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStartedVS.html (Getting Started with the LLVM
2007 Sep 20
0
[LLVMdev] Building with Microsoft Visual Studio
Richard Smith wrote: > I am working on a port of LLVM targeting a proprietary VM. Thus far > development has been under Linux and Cygwin. Cygwin licensing would appear > to require that LLVM built under Cygwin would have to be released under the > GPL, so alternatives are being investigated. > > Using MS Visual Studio and following the instructions at >
2013 Oct 29
2
Problem Building opus-1.0.3 on Microsoft Visual Studio 2012
I am using mvs 2012 but the .sln provided is of msv 2010 so on opening .sln it tries to update libraries which is successful but I am unable to build (compile) it as it gives series of errors. I am pretty new to these things so can anyone tell me if I am doing anything wrong or how to create(.lib and .dll) files so I can use them in my project. Please forgive me if I have asked something foolish.
2013 Oct 29
0
Problem Building opus-1.0.3 on Microsoft Visual Studio 2012
On 2013-10-29 2:39 PM, Akshit Jain wrote: > Thanks a lot for replying. This is the output > >>------ Build started: Project: celt, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------ > 1> fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything. > 1> The system cannot find the file C:\Users\user\Desktop\mUOn\Audio. > 1> #define OPUS_VERSION ""=">
2007 Sep 20
2
[LLVMdev] Building with Microsoft Visual Studio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > I am working on a port of LLVM targeting a proprietary VM. Thus far > development has been under Linux and Cygwin. Cygwin licensing would appear > to require that LLVM built under Cygwin would have to be released under the > GPL, so alternatives are being investigated. I am not a lawyer, but: I think that you are misinterpreting the
2007 Mar 14
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
Jeff Cohen wrote: > Morten Ofstad wrote: >> Jeff Cohen wrote: >> >>> The recent issues concern the head revision, post 1.9. As no one has >>> ever submitted patches to fix 2005 problems with the 1.9 release, it is >>> safe to say they still exist. >>> >> >> For the 1.5 release I submitted patches that made everything compile
2007 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
I just wonder that Visual Studio .NET 2003 is the most compatible one among various MS Visual Studio versions for LLVM. Thank you Seung Jae Lee
2007 Mar 17
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
Can Microsoft Visual Studio be a good tool for making a backend for an architecture? Thanks, Seung ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:44:48 -0700 >From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Andreas Fredriksson wrote: >>
2007 Mar 10
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to work also. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it doesn't due to recent STL issues. Versions prior to 2003 won't work. Seung Jae Lee wrote: > I just wonder that Visual Studio .NET 2003 is the most compatible one among various MS Visual Studio versions for LLVM. > > Thank you >
2011 Jan 10
1
[LLVMdev] Current state of the (new) CBackend & LLVM/clang with Microsoft Visual Studio
Hi. I am interested in using the CBackend of LLVM. I have read about the problems with the current version and that David Greene has started a reimplementation. Can you tell me about its current state? Furthermore, I use Microsoft Visual Studio. The "Getting started with MVC" documents for release 2.8 say "To emphasize, there is no C/C++ front end currently available" but
2012 Dec 28
0
[LLVMdev] JIT crashes Microsoft Visual Studio 2012 when Disassembly Window opens
Microsoft Visual Studio 2012, or 2012 with Update 1, intermittently (90% of the time in my case) crashes when the "Disassembly Window" is opened at the address of JIT code generated by LLVM. This happens when either entering the address into the address bar of the Disassembly Window, or stepping into JIT code that opens the Disassembly Window. Microsoft has acknowledged the crash to
1999 Oct 08
0
FW: Microsoft Visual Dev Studio
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Boucher [mailto:tboucher@abio.com] > Sent: Friday, October 08, 1999 10:57 AM > To: 'samba@samba.org' > Subject: FW: Microsoft Visual Dev Studio > > > > > > Well hello there all, > > > > Thank you all for Samba ! With out it our development > > environment would be much harder to manage.
2007 Mar 10
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 23:40 +0100, Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > > It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to > > work also. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it > > doesn't due to recent STL issues. Versions prior to 2003 won't work. > >
2007 Mar 10
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
No, the problem with StoreSDNode was that an argument as being called Value, which hid the class Value later on in the argument list. This also broke 2003 and was fixed a while ago. _WIN32_WINNT is not supposed to be predefined, so that warning shouldn't be occurring. I have never seen it myself, and a predefined value could be inappropriate. Most of the other changes seem to be about
2007 Mar 12
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
On 3/12/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > Just to make clear, there are no problems building 1.9 with VS 2003, nor > are there any problems as I write this. I'm fairly sure we grabbed the 1.9 tarball off the website, but I could be wrong. > That's what we do. We define it in llvm/lib/System/Win32/Win32.h, which > in included by every file that uses the
2008 Jun 07
5
Microsoft Visual Studio 2005
Hei! I'm new to Linux and Wine. I'm using Linux Fedora 7 and Wine 0.9.58. On my computer there's another operating system ? Windows XP. Now I'm trying to install Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 Professional on Fedora. And I can't do it. When the installation process begins there's an error message - ?A trial edition is already installed on this computer. You must uninstall the
2007 Mar 12
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > On 3/11/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: >> No, the problem with StoreSDNode was that an argument as being called >> Value, >> which hid the class Value later on in the argument list. This also >> broke >> 2003 and was fixed a while ago. > > Ok, I didn't know that. We've been using the 1.9 tarball
2013 Apr 03
3
Installing Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 with Puppet?
Hello, Has anyone here had experience using Puppet (2.7 for now) to install Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 (or even 2012, for that matter) on Windows Server 2008? So far I didn''t find anything on the web, the forge or Github. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop
2007 Mar 10
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
I successfully build llvm from cvs using vs2005 and stlport. I also had a couple of issues, but most were due to outdated project files. I also had to implement code for the alloca instruction. On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > > The recent issues concern the head revision, post 1.9. As no one has > ever submitted patches to fix 2005 problems with the 1.9