similar to: [LLVMdev] Can We Get One? PLEASE?!?

On Dec 12, 2013, at 11:08 PM, C. Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > On 12/13/13 01:58 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: >> That’s a long laundry list of bugs there. It would be great to have them fixed, but the reality of the situation is that they won’t be fixed for weeks or more, if at all. And with Christmas coming up, it makes things even worse. There are a few days before

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Eli Friedman<eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Bill Wendling<isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: >> The core problem, in my opinion, is that people *don't* pay attention >> to the build bot failure messages that come along. > > That's largely because of the number of false positives. > There

On Dec 15, 2013, at 7:10 PM, C. Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > On 12/16/13 09:57 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: >> On Dec 12, 2013, at 11:08 PM, C. Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: >> >>> On 12/13/13 01:58 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: >>>> That’s a long laundry list of bugs there. It would be great to have them fixed, but the

That depends on what you call a false positive. The public buildbot regularly fails because of mailing Frontend tests, and I have had continues failures of some DejaGNU tests for a long time on some builders. Its not a false positive per se, but one starts to ignore the failures because they aren't unexpected. - Daniel On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Bill Wendling<isanbard at

Do these need to go into the 3.0 branch? -bw On Oct 25, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > 2011/10/25 Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>: >> Hi, >> >> Looks like the memory_barrier intrinsic got removed in 3.0 and replaced with fence intrinsics. >> Could someone who understands this change better than me please update the 3.0 release notes? >>

This is a reminder that we will be branching for LLVM 2.9 in one week! 07:00:00 p.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 PST / 03:00:00 a.m. Monday March 7, 2011 GMT What this means for you: Please keep a watch on all of your patches going into mainline. And pay close attention to the buildbots and fix any issues quickly. Also, please try to finish up any last minute feature work. While it won't be the

That’s a long laundry list of bugs there. It would be great to have them fixed, but the reality of the situation is that they won’t be fixed for weeks or more, if at all. And with Christmas coming up, it makes things even worse. There are a few days before Phase III starts to have some progress on them. But if they don’t make it, then we’ll have to release without them. -bw On Dec 12, 2013, at

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Dale Johannesen<dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 15, 2009, at 1:43 PMPDT, Török Edwin wrote: >> On 2009-07-15 23:24, Dale Johannesen wrote: >>> On Jul 15, 2009, at 11:52 AMPDT, Stuart Hastings wrote: > >>> I wonder if we might be able to automate the stabilization somewhat. >>> I'm not at all sure this can be

Rather, use this URL for the darwin binaries: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/ -bw On Nov 25, 2011, at 1:32 AM, Somorjai, Akos wrote: > May I have the darwin binaries as well? > > Best, Akos > > > > On 11/25/11 10:31 AM, "Ákos Somorjai" <asomorjai at graphisoft.com> wrote: > >> Thanks! >> >> Ákos >> >> >>

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:55 PM, David Greene<dag at cray.com> wrote: > On Thursday 16 July 2009 14:04, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> 2009/7/15 Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>: >> > I'm not too keen about seeing buildbots play with trunk ;) >> > >> > How about starting simple, and just auto-tagging builds that work? >> > Could be done

Hello, Is there a chance to get Darwin 32 bit binaries? On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Somorjai, Akos <ASomorjai at graphisoft.com> wrote: > Thanks, downloading at the moment. > > Best, > > Ákos > > > On 11/27/11 3:35 AM, "Bill Wendling" <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > >>Rather, use this URL for the darwin binaries: >> >>  

Hi Bill, Will the 2.9 branch be reflected in the git mirrors? Thanks, Chad On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > This is a reminder that we will be branching for LLVM 2.9 in one week! > 07:00:00 p.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 PST / 03:00:00 a.m. Monday March 7, 2011 > GMT > What this means for you: > Please keep a watch on all of your

On May 5, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Bill Wendling wrote: >> On May 5, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Jeff Cohen wrote: >> >>> Bill wrote: >>>> The LLVM-GCC anonymous mirror should be updated now. Let me know if >>>> this happens again. >>>> >>>> -bw >>> >>> It's still taking over an hour for rsync to

On 12/13/13 01:58 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > That’s a long laundry list of bugs there. It would be great to have them fixed, but the reality of the situation is that they won’t be fixed for weeks or more, if at all. And with Christmas coming up, it makes things even worse. There are a few days before Phase III starts to have some progress on them. But if they don’t make it, then we’ll have to

Thanks, downloading at the moment. Best, Ákos On 11/27/11 3:35 AM, "Bill Wendling" <wendling at apple.com> wrote: >Rather, use this URL for the darwin binaries: > > http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/ > >-bw > >On Nov 25, 2011, at 1:32 AM, Somorjai, Akos wrote: > >> May I have the darwin binaries as well? >> >> Best, Akos >>

FYI: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-October/066389.html Please read and let me know you comments. -bw On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Dmitry Babokin <babokin at gmail.com> wrote: > Looking forward to these changes! Thanks for working on it. > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > I

Good day to you all. Would the person responsible for breaking the build please do fix it? My many pardons for troubling you with this trifling message. -bw

Hi all, Phase 1 testing for the 3.1 release is officially over. We did find a few bugs, which we need your help in fixing: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12568 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12581 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12623 Please spend some time investigating these bugs. If you come up with a fix, great! I'll buy you a beer at the next LLVM dev meeting. :-)

Hi David, Yes. It was the main reason why I decided to do an RC3. :-) -bw On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:41 AM, David Terei wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Is the fix for Bug 9561 included? (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9561) > > Cheers, > David. > > On 26 March 2011 18:38, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The good news:

On Jul 15, 2009, at 7:52 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > 2009/7/15 Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> > > On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:48 PMPDT, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > > That depends on what you call a false positive. The public buildbot > > regularly fails because of mailing Frontend tests, and I have had > > continues failures of some DejaGNU tests for a long time on