similar to: [LLVMdev] Function definition

Hello, Jon > What is the correct way to do this? FunctionType constructor takes extra boolean for marking a varargs function. There is some trick: feed your bytecode to llvm2cpp tool and you'll get C++ source, which will construct the module you provided. From this source you can see, how different things can be created via LLVM API. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty

Hello, Ashwin. You wrote Wednesday, May 24, 2006, 11:25:11 AM: AC> "Pass::getClassPassInfo<PassClass>() "Pass class not AC> registered!"" failed: file AC> "/cygdrive/c/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h", line 76 AC> Aborted Same for me. AC> Wihtout the -march specified (using native x86 assembly) it does AC> convert it into

Nicolas, > Thanks for the advise, but I'm actually not trying to compile code from > text. For now I'm just trying to construct the function directly. Think of > it as the vector equivalent of the HowToUseJIT.cpp example. llvm2cpp is your friend then. It's now a separate 'target' in llc. It will generate C++ code, which will construct provided IR. -- With best

Hello, Scott. > Checking the assembly from llc, the first alloca call is to allocate > local vars in _main. Is this just the state of the code at 2.0 when > built with vs.net, or is there something that I've managed to > mis-build locally? _alloca is used to probe the stack, if you asks for locals of size more that 4k. This is pretty ugly, but the names of this functions differs

Hi Anton, Is the patch going to be uploaded to the CVS source? Ashwin On 5/24/06, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > > > On May 24, 2006, at 5:03 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > > > Hello, Ashwin. > > > > You wrote Wednesday, May 24, 2006, 11:25:11 AM: > > > > AC> "Pass::getClassPassInfo<PassClass>() "Pass class

Bill, > When I try to compile on Darwin now, I get this: Could you please provide LLVM bytecode, where bug is reproducible with llc? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

Chuck, > It is dying trying to store a our working vector into one of the LLVM > vectors created on the stack. Despite the align-16 directive on the > alloca instruction, it is not always aligning to a 16-byte boundary. The stack is not necessary 16 bytes aligned on linux/windows. The vector is really sotred aligned relative to %esp, but %esp value is not good. This is known problem

Hello, Aaron. > /usr/src/llvm-gcc4/gcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__eprintf': > /usr/src/llvm-gcc4/gcc/libgcc2.c:1832: internal compiler error: > Segmentation fault > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See <URL:http://llvm.org/bugs> for instructions. You should: 1. Try to emit bytecode with --emit-llvm compiler switch. 1.1

Hello, Daniel. > glibc < 2.4 don't reliably keep stack at 16 bytes through some calls > (qsort, etc), but otherwise, it stays 16 byte aligned. Interesting, but why in this case stuff like 'force_align_arg_pointer' required? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

On May 24, 2006, at 5:03 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Ashwin. > > You wrote Wednesday, May 24, 2006, 11:25:11 AM: > > AC> "Pass::getClassPassInfo<PassClass>() "Pass class not > AC> registered!"" failed: file > AC> "/cygdrive/c/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h", > line 76 > AC> Aborted > Same

> Ah, got it. > Sounds like we might need to introduce CC_X86_Win32_MSVC_ThisCall then?.. No, we should not. It should be properly expanded in frontend. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

> However, figuring out what can and cannot be deleted from the sparc backend > while still compiling is proving rather frustrating. Why are you looking into sparc backend? I believe the talk makes clear which backend should be considered as a start point (at that time). In any case, https://github.com/asl/llvm-openrisc is better "stub" backend, at least it's 'just' 6

Hi Evan, I updated cvs and recompilled llvm. Still getting some unrecognized commas in the compilation of the assembly file after using llc. I guess this is still future work... Ashwin On 5/25/06, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > > The patch is now in. Sorry about the delay! > > Evan > > On May 25, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Ashwin Chandra wrote: > > Hi

Hi Thanks for the info, it led to the source of the error I was having. I was using llvm-gcc binaries (built with mingw I guess) to compile a .c file that is my language runtime, llvm-link'ing that with my frontend's .ll, and using an vcpp-built lli to run the resulting bytecode. This caused the special case in X86RegisterInfo::emitPrologue for "main" to try to align the stack

How can a frontend tell LLVM to put a function argument on stack/register/etc? On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru> wrote: >> Ah, got it. >> Sounds like we might need to introduce CC_X86_Win32_MSVC_ThisCall then?.. > No, we should not. It should be properly expanded in frontend. > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov >

> How can having an MSVC compatible compiler be to the detriment of clang and > llvm? No one is trying to break mingw here, merely add support for something Just to make stuff clear: I just wanted proper naming which will be non-confusing. Right now we have: - isTargetWindows() which really means "msvc-compabile" - isTargetWin32() which means "everything on windows", so

The patch is now in. Sorry about the delay! Evan On May 25, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Ashwin Chandra wrote: > Hi Anton, > Is the patch going to be uploaded to the CVS source? > > Ashwin > > > On 5/24/06, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > > On May 24, 2006, at 5:03 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > > > Hello, Ashwin. > > > > You wrote

I tried to ask for 32 and that didn't seem to help. MallocInst also seemed to ignore the 16 byte directive. For now, I'm just issuing all my loads as unaligned and that's working ok. Thanks, Chuck. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Evan Cheng Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 10:35 AM To: asl at

The alloca hook is in lib\System\Win32\DynamicLibrary.inc all the way at the bottom. You'll see a __MING32__ #ifdef around the definition. You just have to implement those methods and it'll work just fine. Jake On 6/24/07, Scott Graham <scott.llvm at h4ck3r.net> wrote: > > Hi > > Thanks for the info, it led to the source of the error I was having. > > I was using

Hello, Chris. You wrote Friday, June 2, 2006, 9:27:25 PM: CL> I don't see that failure. We'll need more info to reproduce the issue. Got fixed by adding the folowing line in ther early beginning of LowerAllocations.cpp file: static IncludeFile CUFENP((void*)createUnifyFunctionExitNodesPass); -- With best regards, Anton mailto:asl at math.spbu.ru Friday,