similar to: [LLVMdev] Function definition

Hello, I'm not sure what I am trying to do is possible. I'm trying to create two modules, and call a function in one module from another module. First, a reassurance that I'm not trying to do something completely off the wall would be nice as I don't see any tutorials that do this. Second, any help getting this to work would be wonderful. Thanks, Aaron In my code, you'll

Hi Kirill, Don't forget to add X86TargetMachine.obj (add to Additional Dependencies in Linker options, if you are using MSVS) otherwise LLVM will try and use Interpreter instead of JIT. Hope this helps, Rob. > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of kirill havok > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008

kirill havok wrote: > Hi Gordon, > I wrote a small example, but while running I get an error("Tied to > execute an unknown external function"), where I am wrong? > I think the problem is that some_test_func() is a C++ function, so its name is being mangled during compilation. To fix it, I think you want to add a declaration telling the compiler to treat some_test_func()

Hello, can anyone help me calling native functions from LLVM-Bytecode functions run in the JIT? I have a program which creates an LLVM execution engine and adds modules and functions to it on the fly. I need to call some native functions of my program from bytecode functions which causes some troubles as it appears not to be documented. My test scenario works like the following: I have

Are you able make calls to well known external functions such as printf? As far as I known, this capability is well tested on x86 / Linux. I am wondering if there is some name mangling issue? Evan On Jun 7, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Jan Rehders wrote: > Hello, > > can anyone help me calling native functions from LLVM-Bytecode > functions run in the JIT? > > I have a program

Hi Gordon, I wrote a small example, but while running I get an error("Tied to execute an unknown external function"), where I am wrong? Thanks in advance. Kirill. int some_test_func( int ){ std::cout << "!!!!" << std::endl; return 8848; } int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]){ Module *M = new Module("test"); ExistingModuleProvider* MP = new

Hi, all, I managed to insert the assertion in my bytecode, but the result is not really what I expected :( Let me do a quick recap: I am trying to instrument the bytecode with some assertions, and to do this, I want to insert the abort() function into the bytecode. The problem is that LLVM is creating a new abort() function, instead of using the one that already exists in libc. Let me

I've tripped over this behaviour as well. I ended up working around the problem by creating a new context every time I wanted to link modules together. Which led to me accidently generating one module using two different contexts. Which isn't an error that is detected by module verification. It only causes issues for comparisons like Type equality that compare pointers, and those types of

Hi, I stumbled upon a strange thing regarding types and module linking, which I don't quite get, so maybe someone around here can enlighten me. Consider the following code, which will create 2 modules m1 and m2, and a named structured type %T = { i32 }; m1 contains only a function definition f(%T), m2 contains a function declaration f(%T) and a function definition h(%T), where h will call f

There wouldn't happen to be an index telling one which libraries define which symbols, would there? For example, if I'm told alvm.o: In function `llvm::Function::Create(llvm::FunctionType const*, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, llvm::Module*)':

Hi, I am trying to generate LLVM code that calls a "native" function in the parent program (the program hosting the JIT). I think that I have figured out how to do this, but I get the following assertion failure when the LLVM code is executed: ../llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCJITInfo.cpp:206: failed assertion `ResultPtr >= -(1 << 23) && ResultPtr < (1 << 23)

I have a pointer to a function that I need to invoke without going through llvm::Module::getOrInsertFunction. This example does not work: static int add(int x, int y); llvm::Value *one, *two; llvm::Constant* addfn = llvm::ConstantInt::get(JB->getIntPtrTy(DataLayout), (intptr_t)add); llvm::Type* args[] = { Int32Ty, Int32Ty }; llvm::FunctionType* ftype = llvm::FunctionType::get(Int32Ty,

Hello, everyone I am new to LLVM, now I got a problem I want to add a function call before sleep(int a, int b) code below #include <stdio.h> int sleep(int a, int b) { return a+b; } int main(int argc, char **argv) { sleep(1,2); } after use opt -load ../llvm-2.8/Release+Asserts/lib/bishe_insert.so -bishe_insert <1.bc> 2.bc I want get the code #include <stdio.h>

I have a module having the blockaddress instruction. When I link it into another module and delete the original, blockaddress disappears and is replaced by inttoptr (i32 1 to i8*). Please compile and run the attached program to see the demo of this problem. Right after linking modules, blockaddress still exists: @switch.bbs = internal global [3 x i8*] [i8* blockaddress(@my_func,

Victor Campos wrote: > Guys, > > I would like to instrument the bytecode that LLVM produces with > assertions. I have written the instrumentation code manually, but I do > not know how to halt the program in case the assertion is false. I took > a look into the bytecode that LLVM produces for a program like: > > #include <stdlib.h> > int main() { >

Gregory Junker <gjunker at dayark.com> writes: > Such as printf, etc., from IR created using the API (IRBuilder). > > Google hasn't provided much help, and I can't find anything relevant in > the docs (the docs talk about how to do varargs in LLVM ASM, but not how > to call an external vararg function that exists in a library that gets > linked to the LLVM

Hi, I created a global char array, char buffer[1024]. I want to call a function to append the string information to the buffer repeatedly. For example, I need to implement the following code, where length, a, b, c, are global variables. int length = 0; length += sprintf(buffer+length, "str%d", a); length += sprintf(buffer+length, "str%c", b); length += sprintf(buffer+length,

Hi Hendrick, All of the directories under llvm/lib correspond directly to the libraries that are built, so you should be able to just grep for the symbol definitions and add the corresponding library. Use llvm-config to discover transitive dependencies if possible. On Jun 6, 2008, at 12:20, Hendrik Boom wrote: > There wouldn't happen to be an index telling one which libraries >

Hello, I am trying to run this test program via JIT on my Mac (10.7.1) where I have compiled the latest LLVM code for 32-bit and it is not working properly. Running the same code against LLVM 2.9 works fine. I also tried recompiling my same checkout of LLVM as 64-bit and re-compiled my test program and that works fine, for some reason the 32-bit version is yielding unexpected behavior. I believe

I get a crash when I try to link multiple modules registered in their individual contexts. Documentation for Linker::LinkModules doesn't mention anything about contexts, and the first link succeeds. But the second link crashes. Is this not the right way to merge such modules? If not, then what is the right way? In any case, documentation for Linker::LinkModules should say if contexts are