similar to: [LLVMdev] RFC: Patch for CFA on Darwin

Bill, > The reason for it: when going to calculate the CFA in LLVM, the > original code was adding an offset of type i32 to a pointer. This is > fine if pointers are 32-bits, but we get an assert if the types are > different. By converting the cfa_offset to a pointer, we get it to be > that size. Please ignore my prev. e-mail. The code breaks at least 32-bit stuff. The arg of

Hi all, Here's a potential patch for LLVM-GCC: Index: llvm-convert.cpp =================================================================== --- llvm-convert.cpp (revision 41260) +++ llvm-convert.cpp (working copy) @@ -4240,11 +4240,12 @@ return false; int cfa_offset = ARG_POINTER_CFA_OFFSET(0); - - Result = Builder.CreateCall(Intrinsic::getDeclaration(TheModule, -

Bill, > The built-in dwarf_cfa doesn't take an argument. It returns a pointer. Ah. Sorry for confusion: gcc's __builtin_draft_cfa doesn't have any argument LLVM's eh_dwarf_cfa intrinsic has extra "offset" argument, which is i32, because we have to propagate some information from GCC to LLVM. > But there's an offset associated with the CFA. So it looks like

Dear R-List, (I am not sure whether this list is the right place for my question...) I have a dataframe df.cfa

Hi Sorry for the rather long message. I am trying to use the cfa command in the lavaan package to run a CFA however I am unsure over a couple of issues. I have @25 dichotomous variables, 300 observations and an EFA on a training dataset suggests a 3 factor model. After defining the model I use the command fit.dat <- cfa(model.1, data=my.dat, std.lv = T, estimator="WLSMV",

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:13:52AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: > > The important thing is that only one unwinder is used. The > _Unwind_Context data structure is different between the darwin and FSF > implementations, so you can't pass it between two different > implementations. Since darwin uses two-level namespace and swapping in > a new libgcc_s.dylib at runtime

On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:28:15AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: >> So, when these test cases are run, is the binary linked against /usr/ >> lib/libgcc_s.10.5.dylib? or against some just built libgcc_s. >> 10.5.dylib? >> or against some just build libgcc_s.dylib? If either of the >> latter, then >> if you

I have friendship data which is strong skewed. So it doesn't make sense to use maximum likelihood methods for fa and cfa. But I couldn't find any function for asymptotically distributed data for doing a factor analysis. Only: apca() but there is no possibility to allow for factor correlations. The same problem is with sem() I couldn't get any solutions for my model because of the

Hello, I am trying to do a multiple groups CFA in lavaan and I get the following error message: Error in cov(data.obs, use = "pairwise") : 'x' is empty I'm not sure what this message is referring to, can anyone help me? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Multiple-Groups-CFA-in-Lavaan-tp3457971p3457971.html Sent from the R help mailing

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:28:15AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: > So, when these test cases are run, is the binary linked against /usr/ > lib/libgcc_s.10.5.dylib? or against some just built libgcc_s.10.5.dylib? > or against some just build libgcc_s.dylib? If either of the latter, then > if you changed the FSF build of libgcc_s for darwin to have the right > magic symbols, then

Dear all, I am trying to learn about R. As a Phd student, I would like to use R for Krippendorff s alpha and later for a series of CFA. Is there any good introduction to these kind of analyses, or could you recommend me some tutorials on youtube, for example? I am new to R, so I need something basic , starting from opening the R environment?. Thank you . Martina Hulesova Odesl?no z m?ho Windows

Hi, I am not sure if R-help is the right forum for my question. If not, please let me know. I have to do some discriminant validity tests with some constructs. I am using the method of doing a CFA constraining the correlation of a pair of the constructs to 1 and comparing the chi-square of this constrained model to the unconstrained model. If the chi-square difference is not significant, then I

I'm using specify.model for the sem package. I can't figure out how to represent the residual errors for the observed variables for a CFA model. (Once I get this working I need to add some further constraints.) Here is what I've tried: model.sa <- specify.model() F1 -> X1,l11, NA F1 -> X2,l21, NA F1 -> X3,l31, NA F1 -> X4,l41, NA F1 -> X5, NA, 0.20

David, I guess I'm a little confused here. Are you asking me to provide a "pencil copy" of an LOA for your review? I don't understand why you need an LOA from us. We need an LOA from you to order circuits that will be billed to us that will be attached to your CFA. It was also my understanding that you had an LOA ready to be given to us, which had already been reviewed by

Hello, Ashwin. You wrote Wednesday, May 24, 2006, 11:25:11 AM: AC> "Pass::getClassPassInfo<PassClass>() "Pass class not AC> registered!"" failed: file AC> "/cygdrive/c/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h", line 76 AC> Aborted Same for me. AC> Wihtout the -march specified (using native x86 assembly) it does AC> convert it into

Hello, > If anybody has an idea of how to fix this (other than using another > version of gcc because I am sick of compiling), I would appreciate. I > can offer backtraces or shell access if anybody is interested, just > ask me what you need. This was fixed couple of months ago. Please consider using current svn top of tree, not 2.3 release. -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov

I *know* there has been a lot going on, and congratulations on getting CentOS 8 out! But(!), I don't see any updates to CO 7.7.1908 in the "updates" directory on the mirrors I typically use. All the files date from Sept. 14th. Is something broken? -- *Matt Phelps* *Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator* (Computation Facility, Smithsonian Astrophysical

I performed a CFA using the lavaan package require('lavaan'); HS.model <- 'external_regulation_soc =~ JOBMOTIVATIE_extsoc1 + JOBMOTIVATIE_extsoc2 + JOBMOTIVATIE_extsoc3 external_regulation_mat =~ JOBMOTIVATIE_extmat1 + JOBMOTIVATIE_extmat2 + JOBMOTIVATIE_extmat3 introjected_regulation =~ JOBMOTIVATIE_introj1 +

Chuck, > It is dying trying to store a our working vector into one of the LLVM > vectors created on the stack. Despite the align-16 directive on the > alloca instruction, it is not always aligning to a 16-byte boundary. The stack is not necessary 16 bytes aligned on linux/windows. The vector is really sotred aligned relative to %esp, but %esp value is not good. This is known problem

This is not your usual "so when is CO 7.8.xxxx coming out?" posts. I'm just curious if the CentOS team is affected by our current world conditions, or is work-from-home modus operandi for the team? (In other words, "when is CO 7.8.xxxx coming out?") -- *Matt Phelps* *Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator* (Computation Facility, Smithsonian