similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM 2.1 Code Feeze - 9/12/2007

LLVMers, The LLVM 2.2 release code freeze and branch creation is less than 1 month away. All major changes should be commited to svn at least 1 week before the code freeze. As a reminder, here is the complete release schedule (which can also be found on the main page in the right sidebar): Jan 16, 2008: Branch creation/Code Freeze (9PM PST). Jan 18, 2008: First round of pre-release testing

LLVMers, The LLVM 2.2 code freeze and branch creation is less than 2 weeks away. All major changes should be commited to svn by the middle of next week. As a reminder, here is the complete release schedule (which can also be found on the main page in the right sidebar): Jan 16, 2008: Branch creation/Code Freeze (9PM PST). Jan 18, 2008: First round of pre-release testing begins. Jan 28, 2008:

LLVMers, The LLVM 2.2 code freeze and branch creation is less than 1 week away. At this point, I'm encouraging everyone to think "stability". Please do not check in major changes and please carefully watch all the nightly tester results when commiting any changes at all. As a reminder, here is the complete release schedule (which can also be found on the main page in the right

I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the submitted patches (mine or others) were applied. So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya M. Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 9:00 PM Subject:

Just a reminder, please complete your testing by May 21st! Thanks, Tanya ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 00:25:41 -0700 From: Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: 2.3 Pre-release available for testing LLVMers, The 2.3 pre-release is available for testing:

This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:40 AM

On May 19, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the > submitted > patches (mine or others) were applied. > So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? > Please provide me with a link to the patch(s) that need to be applied (llvm-commits archive email). I only apply patches that have been sent to me and

LLVMers, Sorry for the delay in this email. The 1.8 release has been pushed out 1 week, so today marks 1 week before I create the 1.8 branch. I'm asking that all platform maintainers and available llvm developers review the nightly tester results. Please XFAIL any dejagnu tests that are currently failing, fix any warnings, and review the results of the full llvm test suite. If a test

LLVMers, The LLVM 2.1 code freeze and branch creation will be tomorrow, September 12th at 9PM PDT. This will be my final reminder until the actual branch creation tomorrow. At this point, please be very careful when checking in changes (especially if they may impact platforms you can not test on). Thanks, Tanya Lattner

LLVMers, The 2.1 code freeze and branch creation is next Wednesday, September 12th at 9PM PDT. At this point in time, any major changes should be checked in. You are free to still commit changes to the tree, but please be extra cautious in what you commit and monitor the testers on platforms you are not able to test on. We would like things to remain as stable as possible up until the code

On 2007-12-18, at 20:03, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > The LLVM 2.2 release code freeze and branch creation is less than 1 > month away. All major changes should be commited to svn at least 1 > week before the code freeze. As a reminder, here is the complete > release schedule (which can also be found on the main page in the > right sidebar): > > Jan 16, 2008: Branch

> This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html > > I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. I don't believe I can apply this patch. There have been several patches applied recently to TOT to allow MSVC 2005 which I think many people are using. Does this patch mean that one

LLVMers, It is now 1 week before I will create the 1.9 release branch. I'm asking that all platform maintainers and available llvm developers review the nightly tester results. Please XFAIL any dejagnu tests that are currently failing, fix any warnings, and review the results of the full llvm test suite. If a test failure is determined to be something that needs to be fixed before the

As I saw from the mailing list the MSVC 2005 patches were made to take into account the new files from the development branch, files which are not in the 2.3 release. So for now the below patch is the only one functional for the release. If I am wrong, please someone correct me. If someone can make a 2005 patch for the release branch, it is ok. Else, I am afraid that this one is for now the

llvm.org is now down. I will notify you when it is back up. This will take several hours. -Tanya On Feb 1, 2013, at 9:05 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > Just a reminder, LLVM.org will be going down in 1 hour. > > Thank you, > Tanya > > On Jan 28, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> To be clear: >>

Just a reminder, LLVM.org will be going down in 1 hour. Thank you, Tanya On Jan 28, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > To be clear: > Friday, February 1, 2013 & Monday, February 4, 2013 > > On Jan 28, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> LLVMers, >> >> llvm.org will be down on 2/1

Just a reminder. You have a little over a week to move information over. Thank you, Tanya On Apr 19, 2011, at 10:35 AM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > LLVMers, > > The LLVM wiki will be removed on May 19th. It would be great if people could move any important content to the LLVM docs before this happens. > > There are three main reasons for removing the wiki: > 1) It is full of

Dear Tanya: > You also have a few CBE failures that I am not seeing. What version > of xcode do you have installed? Xcode 2.4.1 > Can you send me the following files? > SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/2008-01-07-LongDouble.* > SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/PR1386.* OK, I attached those files (llvm-2.2-test-output.tar.gz) Best regards, 2008/1/30, Tanya Lattner <tonic at

Hi Tanya, Please apply these patches to the release branch: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of- Mon-20061106/039776.html http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of- Mon-20061106/039781.html Thanks, Evan On Nov 7, 2006, at 10:39 PM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > > I created the 1.9 release branch last night. As a reminder, please > do not > check

My test results for the LLVM 2.2 prerelease. === Q. Target === * Mac OS X 10.4.11 * 2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo * MacBook % uname -a Darwin macbook.local 8.11.1 Darwin Kernel Version 8.11.1: Wed Oct 10 18:23:28 PDT 2007; root:xnu-792.25.20~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 i386 === Q. How you built the release === * objDir != srcDir * Release build * llvm-gcc-4.2 from source