similar to: [LLVMdev] In-memory compilation/execution

Hello, I'm trying to use LLVM on Windows, using the MinGW toolchain that comes with Cygwin (gcc -mno-cygwin, not the standalone msys package). Has anyone successfully built LLVM from sources with this toolchain? The ./configure scripts automatically detects a Cygwin environment. I've spent some time trying to let it know that it should compile for MinGW. FWIW, here's what I've

Óscar Fuentes wrote: > I'm evaluating CMake (1) primarily as an alternative build system for > Visual Studio users, although it can easily be a replacement for > `configure' and hand-made makefiles too, providing a single build system > for all platforms. CMake is a tool that takes a project description and > configures, generates makefiles, project files for IDEs, etc as

I had that problem too: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5116. To work around the problem, you can: * Switch to the thread-unsafe lazy jit. * Allocate your JIT code within 2GB of your text segment. * Find a way to look up the external function with dlsym or maybe the ExecutionEngine's LazyFunctionCreator instead of addGlobalMapping. * Upgrade to the top of the svn tree. On Mon, Dec 7,

Hi Andy, I added the runStaticConstructorsDestructors and FindFunctionNamed functions. This also required making them virtual in EE.h. I'm not sure about FindFunctionNamed: In addition to searching finalized modules, should it search Added and Loaded modules? If it finds a Function in these, should it compile and finalize it before returning the Function* ? I modified the implementation

Antony Blakey wrote: > SVN head LLVM and Clang built out of the box for me a week ago on > MSYS/MINGW, using the following files: Ok, I tried to do the same. The compilations stops with the following error message (actually, I got to the same point in my attempt to build LLVM with the MinGW compiler shipped with Cygwin): llvm[1]: Compiling MachineLoopInfo.cpp for Debug build

Unless I'm missing something, indeed addGlobalMapping should not work with MCJIT. MCJIT does not consult EEState.getGlobalAddressMap when resolving symbols. Instead it uses RTDyldMemoryManager::getSymbolAddress which checks with DynamicLibrary::SearchForAddressOfSymbol, so Andy's suggestion of DynamicLibrary::addSymbol is better as it should work with both JIT and MCJIT. Another options

Hello, I'm starting to play with LLVM today and I've trouble compiling it. I'm working under Windows Vista, with the gcc from Cygwin: gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125) Is LLVM supposed to work with this version of GCC (probably using the -mno-cygwin option to get a Mingw-like behavior)? The LLVM source tree is from the current SVN trunk. Compilation

I have an external function that was added with ExecutionEngine::addGlobalMapping... and the JIT is burning the wrong address into the emitted function. All of the addresses have 0xffffff8d00000000 added to them. Does this look familiar to anyone? I'm using 2.6 on Solaris10/x64 if it matters. This has been working for about two months and I can't readily figure out what I changed to break

Hi Yaron, Overall this looks great. There are a couple of remaining holes. Specifically, MCJIT inherits implementations of the FindFunctionNamed and runStaticConstructorsDestructors methods from ExecutionEngine which use the old Modules vector, so you'll need to override these in MCJIT. (The implementations are fairly trivial.) Beyond that I just have a couple of questions. First,

Hi Andrew, I used the latest code from trunk. GlobalSymbolTable is being used in MCJIT. I guess it wasn't clear from the proposal that the user program will be modified to indicate that the callback should happen at that point in the code. The objective is to call some of the functions which belong to lli or the ExecutionEngine. Thanks, Sumeeth On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Kaylor,

I had this problem a while back and received this response from Jeffrey. FWIW this is fixed in 2.7 by defaulting to CodeModel::Large and using indirect (far) calls. -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Yasskin [mailto:jyasskin at google.com] Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 11:32 AM To: Howell, Nathan Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] 2.6 JIT using wrong address for

[Repost: The mailing list was down yesterday. Sorry if this is a duplicate] I'm evaluating CMake (1) primarily as an alternative build system for Visual Studio users, although it can easily be a replacement for `configure' and hand-made makefiles too, providing a single build system for all platforms. CMake is a tool that takes a project description and configures, generates makefiles,

Hendrik Boom-2 wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:07:35 +0530, Mahadevan R wrote: > >>> Now to compare it in detail with the much smaller program I've got and >>> maybe I'll figure out what's wrong with my call to >>> ExecutionEngine::create. >> >> That call is perfectly valid, actually. It works for me when linked >> with:

Hello, Alain. > I'm starting to play with LLVM today and I've trouble compiling it. > I'm > working under Windows Vista, with the gcc from Cygwin: Oh, this seems to be killer mix :) GCC (at least native mingw32 port) has known problems being running on Vista. > Is LLVM supposed to work with this version of GCC (probably using the > -mno-cygwin option to get a

Are you using the latest code from trunk? I didn't think the latest code used the address mapping in the ExecutionEngine base class. Of course, if people are depending on this it might be something that should be fixed if it isn't working. -Andy From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:Chuck.Caldarale at unisys.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 10:54 AM To: Kaylor, Andrew; sumeeth kc;

> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Kaylor, Andrew > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [Proposal] Adding callback mechanism to Execution Engines > If the function is in a statically linked module, you need to do something to explicitly expose it. With > the older JIT engine you can use addGlobalMapping as Yaron suggests, but I

Hi everybody. I've just started learning about LLVM and didn't get too far studying the core. I couldn't find the solution to my problem (if it has one) in the mailing list or the source code. The problem is: how can I redefine a function that's been called already by some other function? Suppose I have 3 files, all compiled to bytecode through llvm-gcc (I think it could be clang

Hi, > Jan, how are you doing this? Are you creating an external LLVM > Function > object named "get5", then using EE::addGlobalMapping? If 'get5' > exists in > the address space, why not just let the JIT resolve it (which will > then > create the stub)? Yes. I create a Function with matching signature, calling conventions and external linkage

Hi llvmdev! In our project (Windows, Visual Studio compiler) we've got some frontend which generates LLVM IR. Now I'm observing strange *llvm_shutdown* behavior. If I called it when I was done using the LLVM APIs I saw that destructors of static objects created new ManagedStatic objects, which was never freed. Then I tried to use static global llvm_shutdown_obj to cause destruction

Hi For a research project at my university, I'm working on incorporating JIT in Prolog, which is basically an interpreted virtual machine. The VM uses logical units of functionality called 'predicates' which are composed of bytecode that represents the machine instructions the VM supports. At execution time, the VM infinitately loops over these bytecodes and, using a giant switch