Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Problem compiling LLVM under Cygwin/Mingw"
2007 Aug 06
0
[LLVMdev] Problem compiling LLVM under Cygwin/Mingw
In any case, it seems that GCC 3.4.4 may be in hot water even if you
did get it to compile:
http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc
--
Christopher Lamb
On Aug 6, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Alain Frisch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm starting to play with LLVM today and I've trouble compiling it.
> I'm
> working under Windows Vista, with the gcc from Cygwin:
>
>
2007 Dec 29
1
[LLVMdev] svn broken on cygwin
Function.cpp:167: error: call of overloaded `AddInteger(uint32_t&)' is
ambiguous
/home/Seb/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FoldingSet.h:151: note: candidates are: void
llv
m::FoldingSetImpl::NodeID::AddInteger(int)
/home/Seb/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FoldingSet.h:152: note: void
llvm::FoldingSetIm
pl::NodeID::AddInteger(unsigned int)
/home/Seb/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FoldingSet.h:153: note: void
2007 Aug 06
1
[LLVMdev] Problem compiling LLVM under Cygwin/Mingw
Hello, Alain.
> I'm starting to play with LLVM today and I've trouble compiling it.
> I'm
> working under Windows Vista, with the gcc from Cygwin:
Oh, this seems to be killer mix :) GCC (at least native mingw32 port)
has known problems being running on Vista.
> Is LLVM supposed to work with this version of GCC (probably using the
> -mno-cygwin option to get a
2008 Aug 15
3
[LLVMdev] install question
I'm trying to install llvm on my windows development box and hit a
problem
I'm using cygwin
cygwin% gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125)
I downloaded both the top of tree via svn
I ran ./configure
make
make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/llvm/lib/Support'
llvm[1]: Compiling APFloat.cpp for Debug build
llvm[1]: Compiling APInt.cpp
2008 Aug 15
0
[LLVMdev] install question
Rubin, Norman wrote:
> I'm trying to install llvm on my windows development box and hit a
> problem
> I'm using cygwin
> cygwin% gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125)
>
> I downloaded both the top of tree via svn
> I ran ./configure
> make
>
> make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/llvm/lib/Support'
>
2008 Oct 07
2
[LLVMdev] can't build LLVM under Cygwin | released MinGW llvm-2.3 image
I used to be able to build LLVM (from source) under Cygwin for llvm-2.2
and previous releases, but can't continue the trend since the release of
LLVM 2.3.
I have tried a wide variety of gcc compilers (gcc 3.4.4, 4.1.2, 4.2.4
and 4.3.2) on cygwin, they all fail at the same location:
C:\cygwin\home\czhao\ResearchTools\LLVM\2.3\obj2.3>make
make[1]: Entering directory
2013 Mar 18
2
[LLVMdev] Help with LLVM 3.2 linking error
Hello
I'm trying to link my project with llvm 3.2 libraries.
I haven't touched the project for some months. Previously I used to
link to an svn build of llvm 3.1 and
everything worked fine.
I've compiled llvm with ./configure --enable-libcpp --enable-cxx11
Currently I'm only using StringRef, SmallVector and FoldingSet, so I
only link libLLVMSupport and libLLVMCore.
Are they
2008 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] can't build LLVM under Cygwin | released MinGW llvm-2.3 image
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:12:05PM -0400, Chuck Zhao wrote:
> I used to be able to build LLVM (from source) under Cygwin for llvm-2.2
> and previous releases, but can't continue the trend since the release of
> LLVM 2.3.
> I have tried a wide variety of gcc compilers (gcc 3.4.4, 4.1.2, 4.2.4
> and 4.3.2) on cygwin, they all fail at the same location:
>
>
2008 Aug 15
0
[LLVMdev] Check out my Facebook profile
On Aug 14, 2008, at 9:49 PM, Andy Kitchen wrote:
FYI, all posts to llvmdev are moderated until the person posts
something sensible. This is a PITA for me (llvm mailing lists get
dozens of spams a day which require moderation), but is generally very
effective.
Since Andy had already posted something sensible, he was on the
whitelist. However, he just lost the ability to post to llvmdev
2008 May 25
0
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support
On May 24, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On May 24, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>
>> Let us know if you would like extra eyes on the two PPC failures.
>> Many
>> of us have a lot of experience with C++. :-) Do you know where these
>> allocations are?
>
> I don't mind if people help out, so here's some information:
>
Could
2008 Aug 15
3
[LLVMdev] Check out my Facebook profile
I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and events and I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you need to join Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own profile.
Thanks,
Andy
Here's the link:
http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=612598021&k=63FYZWQ6WVVM5FEIWDV2PT&r&v=2
___________________
This e-mail may contain promotional
2009 Feb 11
6
[LLVMdev] Some enhancements to ImmutableSet and FoldingSet
I needed these for some work I'm doing in clang...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: set.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1925 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090211/82192816/attachment.obj>
2013 Mar 18
0
[LLVMdev] Help with LLVM 3.2 linking error
Nicola Gigante <nicola.gigante at gmail.com> writes:
> The error I get is the following:
> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
> "typeinfo for llvm::FoldingSetImpl", referenced from:
> typeinfo for llvm::FoldingSet<Type> in Program.o
> ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
>
> Looking at the error the question is: is llvm built
2008 May 25
3
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support
On May 25, 2008, at 12:58 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On May 24, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
>> On May 24, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>>
>>> Let us know if you would like extra eyes on the two PPC failures.
>>> Many
>>> of us have a lot of experience with C++. :-) Do you know where these
>>> allocations are?
2013 Mar 18
2
[LLVMdev] Help with LLVM 3.2 linking error
Il giorno 18/mar/2013, alle ore 15:14, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> ha scritto:
> Nicola Gigante <nicola.gigante at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> The error I get is the following:
>> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
>> "typeinfo for llvm::FoldingSetImpl", referenced from:
>> typeinfo for llvm::FoldingSet<Type> in Program.o
2008 May 24
5
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support
On May 24, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> Let us know if you would like extra eyes on the two PPC failures. Many
> of us have a lot of experience with C++. :-) Do you know where these
> allocations are?
I don't mind if people help out, so here's some information:
FAIL: /nfs/llvm/src/llvm/test/Transforms/PredicateSimplifier/
2006-11-04-ReplacingZeros.ll
Failed with
2012 Jan 03
1
[LLVMdev] Current LLVM/CLANG build failure.
I did an update about 1/2 hr ago, and instead of failing to link with
-O4, I'm getting an error elsewhere in the compile.
I think I need to stop chasing the bleeding edge.
pandora 142% svn update
At revision 147455.
pandora 143% uname -a
Darwin pandora.psychiatry.uiowa.edu 10.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version
10.8.0: Tue Jun 7 16:33:36 PDT 2011;
root:xnu-1504.15.3~1/RELEASE_I386 i386
pandora 144%
2008 May 26
0
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support
On May 25, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On May 25, 2008, at 12:58 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>
>> Could you try this (massively hacky) patch out to see if it fixes
>> your
>> problem?
>>
>>
> Alas, it didn't fix the problem:
>
Crumbs.
I think that the analysis I told you before wasn't fully correct. I
think I mentioned something
2008 May 26
2
[LLVMdev] use after free [was: A quick update on FreeBSD support]
On May 26, 2008, at 1:25 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On May 25, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>> On May 25, 2008, at 12:58 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>>
>>> Could you try this (massively hacky) patch out to see if it fixes
>>> your
>>> problem?
>>>
>>>
>> Alas, it didn't fix the problem:
>>
> Crumbs.
>
>
2007 Jul 27
2
[LLVMdev] Couple of changes (2005 and other toolchain related)
Hi,
I upgraded the Visual Studio SLN file to work with 2005 and had to make some
changes.
The first two have to do with the fact that the debug implementation of 2005's
STL does all sort of validation, that's why they didnt show up on 2003.
I'm not set up for patch submission yet, but if somebody has time to review
these changes that'd be greatly appreciated.
Meanwhile