similar to: [LLVMdev] Making test-suite regression detection easier

Hi Christopher, On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 12:58 -0700, Christopher Lamb wrote: > Most of the time I'm working on a non-public LLVM target, but > sometimes I want to contribute fixes or enhancements back to the core > of LLVM or a public target. One thing that I end up having to do each > time this happens is that I've got to run the test-suite with a > vanilla copy of LLVM from

It seems after the change on Zion that the nightly test is broken. When I go to http://llvm.org/nightlytest/, I get a blank page. Any ideas? Reid.

Reid Spencer wrote: > It seems after the change on Zion that the nightly test is broken. When > I go to http://llvm.org/nightlytest/, I get a blank page. Any ideas? > According to the web server error log, there's a syntax error in the PHP script for that page. It looks like Patrick Jenkins made some changes earlier today (aka last last night). This is the error that I get:

At this moment I use "gmake TEST=nightly" command line to run night tester What I must specific and where to disable SPEC run (i don't have it) I known about new NightlyTest.pl option: -noexternals But what I must do for enable it Vladimir

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > At this moment I use > "gmake TEST=nightly" command line to run night tester > > What I must specific and where to disable SPEC run (i don't have it) I think that it's currently a bug that this does not automatically happen. > I known about new NightlyTest.pl option: -noexternals > But what I must do for

Nightly tester 'grawp' is reporting compilation error ? How do I see detailed build log ? Thanks, - Devang

> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > > > At this moment I use > > "gmake TEST=nightly" command line to run night tester > > > > What I must specific and where to disable SPEC run (i don't have it) > > I think that it's currently a bug that this does not automatically happen. > > > I known about new NightlyTest.pl option:

I've noticed that my nightly tester doesn't seem to be reporting the results of running llvm-test, only build warnings and make check. Checking with -verbose shows that it's running the test suite, so I don't quite understand what's going on. Looking at http://llvm.org/nightlytest/ shows that none of the other Linux testers are reporting test suite results either.

Am Montag, den 12.05.2008, 09:08 -0700 schrieb Devang Patel: > On May 12, 2008, at 2:59 AM, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: > > > 2) What is the relative performance of code generated by LLVM > > and gcc respectively? > > See llvm.org/nightlytest Which does not compare GCC vs. LLVM. (I haven't seen this announced as the nightly tester's purpose either.) > Many

Hi, This is a simple question about building ARM cross-compiler. What is the building procedure using LLVM 2.4 and GCC front-end 4.2? I used these commands for LLVM, and it is okay. $ ../configure --prefix=/usr/local -target=arm $ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0 $ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0 install Then these commands were used for GCC front-end but this got couple of errors. $ ../configure

On May 12, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > Am Montag, den 12.05.2008, 09:08 -0700 schrieb Devang Patel: >> On May 12, 2008, at 2:59 AM, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: >> >>> 2) What is the relative performance of code generated by LLVM >>> and gcc respectively? >> >> See llvm.org/nightlytest > > Which does not compare GCC vs. LLVM.

Hi Devang, Unfortunately, there's no way to see the build log unless you're on the machine from which the report was generated. If you can log in to Grawp's machine then it should be in the "WEBDIR". It is most likely mis-compiling because the needed llvm-gcc patch has not been applied after the SETCC patch to LLVM was committed last weekend. Reid. On Fri, 2006-12-29 at

2008/12/28 Keun Soo Yim <yim6 at illinois.edu> > This is a simple question about building ARM cross-compiler. > What is the building procedure using LLVM 2.4 and GCC front-end 4.2? > > I used these commands for LLVM, and it is okay. > > $ ../configure --prefix=/usr/local -target=arm > $ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0 > $ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0 install > > Then

hi all, After having some discussions in the IRC, I am trying here to come up with a proposal for GSoC 2008 for improving the llvm nightly tester[1].Following are the ideas and suggestions that came up in the discussion, if you have any comment or any other suggestion please add them to the list. I have some doubts in some places. 1. Improvements to the perl script which manage actual testing

On Sat, 5 May 2007, David Greene wrote: > There's the llvm-testresults list, but I find it less than fully useful > because it's not immediately obvious from scanning message subjects if > there's been a test failure. It's a lot of messages to wade through and > read to get this information. Right. > What about a Tinderbox-like setup where we could consult a web

On 2007-08-19, at 14:53, Torvald Riegel wrote: > does anyone keep track of performance results? Benchmark info is submitted by the nightly testers. http://llvm.org/nightlytest/ — Gordon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070819/636214ba/attachment.html>

> See llvm.org/nightlytest Many testers run various benchmarks > and produces comparison numbers daily. Can I trust those numbers? For example, right now I'm looking at http://llvm.org/nightlytest/machine.php?machine=230. "CVS checkout time" might be wrong, as LLVM is now in SVN. This column also jitters heavily. However, it's not really important. "Configure

Hi All, Do to popular request, I just set up a new mailing list to capture the nightly tester output from the various testers running 'round the world. The new list is available here: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults If you're running a nightly tester, please update your crontab to send mail to the llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu list (potentially in addition

On Jul 14, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Devang Patel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Daniel Dunbar<daniel at zuster.org> > wrote: >> Since it came up, what is blocking us from putting these tests in the >> llvm-gcc test suite instead of in the LLVM test suite? > > Usually we want to check these tests regularly against llvm backend > changes. The nightly tester

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: >> Do to popular request, I just set up a new mailing list to capture the >> nightly tester output from the various testers running 'round the world. >> The new list is available here: >> http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults >> >> If you're running a nightly tester, please update