Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] svn issues"
2007 Jul 25
0
[LLVMdev] svn issues
Hi David,
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 10:38 -0500, David A. Greene wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of errors from svn like this:
>
> svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default'
> svn: REPORT of '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default': Could not read response
> body: Secure connection truncated (https://llvm.org)
What is
2007 Jul 25
3
[LLVMdev] svn issues
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 11:06, Reid Spencer wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 10:38 -0500, David A. Greene wrote:
> > I'm getting a lot of errors from svn like this:
> >
> > svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default'
> > svn: REPORT of '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default': Could not read
> > response
2006 Aug 16
1
Re: 400 Bad Request error from svn
It's nice to see that the OS where CentOS gets its sources from also
experiments the same error!
I have been very busy lately so I haven't had the time to deal with the
problem, probably later this week or early next week. As soon as I find
something Ill let you know. Hopefully you'll do the same if you come
across the solution first.
PS. Forwarding this message to the mailing
2007 Jul 25
0
[LLVMdev] svn issues
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 11:45, David Greene wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 July 2007 11:06, Reid Spencer wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 10:38 -0500, David A. Greene wrote:
> > > I'm getting a lot of errors from svn like this:
> > >
> > > svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default'
> > > svn:
2009 Aug 10
3
[LLVMdev] svn down?
I've been getting this on svn update all day:
svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default'
svn: REPORT of '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default': 403 Forbidden
(http://llvm.org)
Is this related to the server problems that have been going on for a while?
-Dave
2009 Aug 10
0
[LLVMdev] svn down?
On Aug 10, 2009, at 2:59 PM, David Greene wrote:
> I've been getting this on svn update all day:
>
> svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default'
> svn: REPORT of '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default': 403 Forbidden
> (http://llvm.org)
>
> Is this related to the server problems that have been going on for a
> while?
>
svn is
2006 Aug 11
2
Subversion: 400 Bad request error
Here is my problem,
On my network there is a subversion server to which everybody connects
to and checks in/out code and documents. The workstations on the network
are all based on Fedora core 3. And everybody's home directory is on a
nfs share. This nfs share is mounted via the fstab. So no matter to
which box a user logs in, his/her home dir is gonna be the same.
Again, /home is a nfs
2010 Mar 30
3
[LLVMdev] Need help fixing 2.7 release blockers
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 17:45:16 David Greene wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 March 2010 16:09:03 Tanya Lattner wrote:
> > Please take a look at all release blockers:
> > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6586
>
> 5893 is not release-critical according to Doug.
>
> 6640 appears to be a test system problem with a patch available (one of the
> ones you're working on?)
2009 Aug 11
1
[LLVMdev] svn down?
On Monday 10 August 2009 17:42, Tanya Lattner wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2009, at 2:59 PM, David Greene wrote:
> > I've been getting this on svn update all day:
> >
> > svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default'
> > svn: REPORT of '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default': 403 Forbidden
> > (http://llvm.org)
> >
> > Is
2011 Apr 22
3
[LLVMdev] svn server permissions for top-level svn update
Hi,
My svn working copy mirrors the layout of the whole svn repository,
from llvm-project downwards, so I have:
~/svn/llvm-project/
~/svn/llvm-project/llvm/
~/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/ # lots of stuff in here
~/svn/llvm-project/cfe/
~/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/ # and lots of stuff in here
(and likewise for test-suite, llvm-gcc-4.2 and dragonegg)
This is nice because I can do "svn
2007 Jul 25
0
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Re: svn issues]
This just in from Oscar ..
Reid
-------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: Oscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es>
> To: Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com>
> Subject: Re: svn issues
> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:09:17 +0200
>
> Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> writes:
>
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 10:38 -0500,
2007 Jul 25
1
[LLVMdev] svn issues
David,
Did upgrading to a newer version help at all? If so, I'd like to notify
people to stay away from 1.3.1. What's the status?
Reid.
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 12:07 -0500, David Greene wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 July 2007 11:45, David Greene wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 July 2007 11:06, Reid Spencer wrote:
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at
2008 Jul 10
4
Distributed Setup Suggestions
My company is approx 200 users. We have 10 offices each with 5-30 users
each. A few offices work independently, but there has been a lot more
inter-office work lately. I am looking for a way to provide fast local
access to files stored in the same office as the user, but also acceptable
performance for inter-office file transfers.
We are currently using Oracle Drive for a central file server, it
2010 Apr 01
7
Press release: Virtual Communication Clouds :: New feature in Asterisk 1.8
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Puerto Escondido, Mexico, April 1st, 2010:
Digium launches Asterisk VCC (TM) - a new virtual communication platform
for enterprises, the public sector and the home.
===========================================================
Asterisk 1.8 will contain a stunning new technology for all Asterisk users world-
wide - virtual communication clouds or VCC (TM). With this
2017 Jun 25
2
IMPORTANT: LLVM.org server move complete (SVN impact please read)
Adding +Eric Liu <ioeric at google.com> who helps with Phabricator....
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 3:15 PM Davide Italiano via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Anton Korobeynikov
> <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
> > Thanks, fixed.
> >
>
> Also, FWIW, phabricator commit mails are broken. Example:
>
>
2018 Feb 13
1
can't extract diffs from llvm svn any more
It used to be that you could extract the diff for change with a command
like:
svn diff -c 323998 http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk
I now get:
svn: E175013: Access to '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default' forbidden
I uses this to extract upstream patches for release version of llvm
products to add to the packages in FreeBSD. If there's another prefered
option please let me
2012 Nov 17
0
[LLVMdev] Poll: Do you prefer Git or SVN for LLVM development?
Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> writes:
> I'm curious to know if the LLVM community is deeply split when it
> comes to version control. If you have a second, could you please
> vote?
>
> http://poll.pollcode.com/i597kq
The result of this poll has little value in practice. In the past the
project leader stated that the opinions of the most active contributors
2007 Jul 12
2
[LLVMdev] Installing clang
Really happy to hear llvm has the brand-new front-end.
But, unfortunately, I failed to install it.
When I 'svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk clang' in llvm/tools folder, I got this message..
svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default'
svn: REPORT of '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default': 400 Bad Request (http://llvm.org)
Am I missing
2010 Oct 06
1
[LLVMdev] RELEASE_28 SVN tag
Hello all,
According to: http://llvm.org/releases/2.8/docs/GettingStarted.html#checkout
folks
can check out a specific release from Subversion. As of right now,
RELEASE_28 contains folders for each of the release candidates, as opposed
to the final content. Same goes for Clang.
-Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2011 Jul 08
0
[LLVMdev] type-system-rewrite branch near landing
>> ~/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches$ svn up
>> svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response
>> to REPORT request for '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default'
>
> I think that explicitly returns Forbidden just to avoid the strain on
> the server; if you have any write access, you should have write access
> to everything.
Off topic, but