similar to: [LLVMdev] LHS of an expression

Hi Bill, Thanks a lot for your response.But my problem still remains.The thing is i am having a data type std::vector<Value*> as i am checking for the variables in Store Instructions and Malloc Instructions.For store the case is straightforward as discussed earlier.I want the same Value* variable for malloc inst as well. bcos i cannot have a different set for only instructions. can there be

Hi Abhinav, > If i have an IR instruction of the form > %tmp10 = call sbyte* %malloc( uint 4 ) ; <sbyte*> [#uses=1] > %tmp10 = cast sbyte* %tmp10 to int* ; <int*> [#uses=1] > store int* %tmp10, int** %t > > which is nothin but a malloc call how can i get %tmp into maybe a variable > set. > > If i have a store instruction then it is

On 7/23/07, abhi232 at cc.gatech.edu <abhi232 at cc.gatech.edu> wrote: > Hi Bill, > Thanks a lot for your response.But my problem still remains.The thing is i > am having a data type std::vector<Value*> as i am checking for the > variables in Store Instructions and Malloc Instructions.For store the case > is straightforward as discussed earlier.I want the same Value*

Hey all, I compiled the code using both the -c and -S options. I can get the human readable IR but I still cannot run it using lli. The output of the IR looks like this. Can some of the information tell me about why the program is not running. ; ModuleID = 'Hel.c' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32" target endian = little target pointersize = 32 target triple =

On May 22, 2014, at 3:51 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Louis Gerbarg <lgg at apple.com> wrote: > The problem that the above transform is technically illegal because “When indexing into a (optionally packed) structure, only i32 integer constants are allowed (when using a vector of indices they must all be the same

Hi, I want to clone a given function, and add an argument to it. I then want to add a call to that new function. I have a callInstruction CI, which I want to transform to call this new function, and to take a new argument. The code I added was as follows CI->getCalledFunction()->dump(); Function* DirectF = CloneFunction(CI->getCalledFunction());

Hi, I'm using LLVM 2.7 right now, and I found "opt -std-compile-opts" has missed some opportunities for optimization: define void @spa.main() readonly { entry: %tmp = load i32* @dst-ip ; <i32> [#uses=3] %tmp1 = and i32 %tmp, -16777216 ; <i32> [#uses=1] %tmp2 = icmp eq i32 %tmp1, 167772160 ; <i1> [#uses=2]

Hey Duncan, hey everybody else, I just stumbled upon a problem in the latest llvm-gcc trunk which is related to my previous problem with the 64bit ABI and structs: Given the following code: struct float3 { float x, y, z; }; extern "C" void __attribute__((noinline)) test(float3 a, float3* res) { res->y = a.y; } int main(void) { float3 a; float3 res; test(a,

The following piece of IR is a fixed point for opt -std-compile-opts/-O3: --- target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-S128-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f16:16:16-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-f128:128:128-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64" target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" ; Function Attrs: nounwind readonly define i32 @get32Bits(i8*

[+Arnold] > On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:29 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > [+CC Andy] > >> Can anyone familiar with ScalarRevolution tell me whether this is an >> expected behavior or a bug? > > Assuming you're talking about 2*k, this is a bug. ScalarEvolution > should be able to prove that {0,+,4} is <nsw> and

hm.... I think, that is valid in c but next code too doesn't works right: ; ModuleID = 'sample.lz' @.str1 = internal global [6 x i8] c"world\00" ; <[6 x i8]*> [#uses=1] @.str2 = internal global [7 x i8] c"hello \00" ; <[7 x i8]*> [#uses=1] @.str7 = internal global [7 x i8] c"father\00" ; <[7 x i8]*> [#uses=1]

Recently I posted a patch to migrate certain GEPs between basic blocks in cases where doing so would improve the ability of instcombine to merge into more complicated addressing mode (r209049 and r209065). After some build to failures it was rolled back. I now have a patch that no longer causes the regressions I was seeing, but it also no longer can optimize the case I was trying to optimize. As

Hi, though DSA isn't maintained in the current build, I need to use it for analyzing dependencies among functions. Therfore I load the EQTDDataStructures pass and retrieve the mapping from nodes int the callee to the ones in the parent DSGraph with computeNodeMapping. In most cases this works well, but for some function calls I get following error: DSGraph.cpp:1379: static void

On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:08:13PM +0400, Robert Khasanov wrote: > Hi Reid, > > Would you approve your patches r203146 and r202774 to be backported to > 3.4.1? They fix stability issues in x86 asm. > Hi Robert, I was able to merge r203146, but it used a c++11 feature: std::string::back() which I replaced with std::string::at(std::string::size() - 1). r202774 was not merged,

Hi, Iam getting the following error ActionController::MethodNotAllowed Only get, put and delete requests are allowed. Actually, Iam trying to have multiple actions for a form to create new record. The actions for the form are cancel, save, publish and preview. here''s the config/routes.rb file code snippet for the relevant controller - Events map.resources :events, :member =>

Hello all, I am instrumenting the code such that I write the results of some instructions to file. As you can see below, I am writing the results of add instruction to the file. The IR generated for writeToFile is also posted below. My problem is that it is writing to the file in format bytes and it is not human-readable. How do I make it write human readable strings to the file? define i32

Hi owen, Can you please elaborate as to what should I do? Find all the instruction which have r2 in it and replace all of them with r1 and then remove the load instruction? Thanks Abhinav ----- Original Message ----- From: "Owen Anderson" <resistor at mac.com> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 11:22:32 PM

On Jan 11, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> There is no good reason for malloc to be an instruction anymore. >>> I'd >>> be very happy if it got removed. Even if we keep it, malloc/alloca >>> should be extended to optionally take 64-bit sizes. >> >> I'm curious. Do we want to keep the free instruction? > > No,

Hi, I am not exactly sure what causes your error. But if you have a reduced test case we can try looking at it. Thanks, Arushi Hello, i wrote a little pass. It tries to identify every call- / invoke-instruction recursively and calls computeCalleeCallerMapping for each. The sample program just creates a vector of integer and adds an element to it. Do you know what's wrong? Best,

Hi, I need to install Rmagick to get re-sizing working with Paperclip. My dev machine is on Mac OSX Leopard and the server is on Ubuntu Intrepid 8.1 I dint have Macports or wget at first. I was following this article - http://onrails.org/articles/2007/11/03/installing-rmagick-on-leopard-without-macports-or-fink. Ive done this before too. But some dependency always failed. I want to start with a